Category Archives: Diane Sawyer

By NewsBusters.org
June 28, 2010
Leave a Comment

As Much on Byrd’s Fiddle Playing as Klan Days; ‘Like Constitution and Bible, Permanent Fixture of the Senate’

The networks Monday night skipped lightly over the late Senator Robert Byrd's segregationist and racist record, devoting as much time to the Democrat's fiddle-playing prowess as his years in the Ku Klux Klan, which CBS's Chip Reid excused as “an effort to help his political career.”

Leading into file video of Byrd playing his fiddle, ABC anchor Diane Sawyer declared “Byrd was a powerhouse and old-fashioned crowd-pleaser on the stump, whipping out his fiddle.” Though Byrd is the only Senator to have voted against both Thurgood Marshall and Clarence Thomas, Cokie Roberts asserted that “as the country changed, Robert Byrd changed with it. He readily endorsed Barack Obama for President.”

After touting how by “writing several volumes of Senate history” Byrd had followed in Caesar's “footsteps,” she concluded: “Like the Constitution and the bible, Robert Byrd will be a permanent fixture of the Senate.”

On CBS, Reid also stressed the fiddle-playing: “Byrd grew up in poverty in the coal fields of West Virginia where he learned to play the fiddle. For decades, he used it to entertain audiences on the campaign trail.” Reid later recalled:

His life was not without mistakes. He joined the Ku Klux Klan as a young man, an effort to help his political career -- a decision that haunted him all his life. He also participated in the historic filibuster against the Civil Rights Act of 1964. He later apologized for both actions and became a strong advocate of civil rights.

Since he's a Democrat, all is forgiven.

The full coverage on the Monday, June 28 World News on ABC:

DIANE SAWYER: An historic passing to note. On the same day Alaska became a state, Robert Byrd of West Virginia was sworn in as a U.S. Senator. Byrd died early today at the age of 92, the longest-serving member of Congress in history. His Senate desk draped in black bunting. Byrd was a powerhouse and old-fashioned crowd pleaser on the stump, whipping out his fiddle. [video of Byrd playing fiddle] Our Cokie Roberts remembers an icon now.

COKIE ROBERTS: Though most politicians tout their humble beginnings, Robert Byrd was the real deal. An orphan raised dirt poor who never went to college, but went to Congress. In early days, he was a member of the Ku Klux Klan and filibustered against civil rights. He later apologized for his Klan membership.

ROBERT BYRD: It was a mistake and one that I have greatly regretted over the years.

ROBERTS: And as the country changed, Robert Byrd changed with it. He readily endorsed Barack Obama for President. And though he had supported the Vietnam war he became a forceful voice against the Iraq war.

BYRD: Why is war being dealt with not as a last resort but as a first resort?

ROBERTS: He never forgot the voters of West Virginia who saw more than $3 billion in federal funds come their way. It was, however, the United States Senate that mattered most to Byrd. He lauded the institution and often lectured it.

BYRD: Caesar showed himself at this time to be also a historian.

ROBERTS: Byrd followed in the Roman's footsteps, writing several volumes of Senate history, reminding his colleagues and the country that the institution is more important than politics or Presidents. That's why he always carried the Constitution, which names Byrd's beloved Congress as the first branch of government.

BYRD: I say we ought to read the Constitution more.

ROBERTS: And, like the Constitution and the bible, Robert Byrd will be a permanent fixture of the Senate.

By NewsBusters.org
June 22, 2010
Leave a Comment

ABC Frets Over Pickle McChrystal Has Put Obama Into: Look ‘Petulant’ or ‘Weak’

ABC, CBS and NBC all led Tuesday night with multiple stories on the “firestorm” over disrespectful coments by General Stanley McChrystal and his aides about President Obama and other administration officials, but ABC's Diane Sawyer and George Stephanopoulos particularly despaired over the position in which McChrystal has put Obama.

Sawyer fretted that Obama “now faces a mind-boggling choice,” before Stephanopoulos kvetched “the President has really been put in a real political box” and “a very painful political position,” forcing him to choose between “looking thin-skinned and petulant” or “looking weak.”

CBS's Katie Couric didn't go that far, but she was disturbed by the burden on Obama: “This controversy is about the last thing the President needed on his plate as he deals with two wars overseas and another against an invasion of oil off the gulf coast.”

Sawyer asked chief political correspondent/Good Morning America co-host Stephanopoulos: “What are you hearing, George?” He worried about Obama's plight:

That a debate has been raging inside the administration since this article hit last night, and that the President has really been put in a real political box. If he fires McChrystal after this, he risks looking thin-skinned and petulant. But if he accepts these words, which some consider insubordination, then he risks looking weak. So it's a very painful political position right now for the President.

Sawyer had led the June 22 World News:

Good evening. There was a giant explosion heard around the world today, and it had nothing to do with weapons. Everything to do with words. General Stanley McChrystal, the commander of U.S. forces in Afghanistan, gave an interview to a magazine. And in it, he and his aides took aim at everyone from the President to the Vice President to Senators and diplomats.

The General has been summoned to the White House by President Obama, who now faces a mind-boggling choice. Does he fire the man central to the war right before a major battle? Jake Tapper takes us inside a stunned and furious White House.

By NewsBusters.org
June 21, 2010
Leave a Comment

ABC and NBC Describe Arizona Law as ‘Anti-Immigration’ and ‘Harsh’

Network anchors can’t resist misconstruing Arizona’s upcoming immigration enforcement law. The latest instances came Friday night when ABC and NBC caught up with news that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton told an interviewer in Ecuador that the Obama administration will sue to block the law.

Diane Sawyer erroneously described the anti-illegal immigration measure as “Arizona's controversial new anti-immigration law” while Lester Holt, filling in on the NBC Nightly News, characterized the law as “harsh,” relaying:

There's been a stir this week over something Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said in Ecuador earlier this month. She suggested the federal government would sue Arizona over its harsh new immigration law designed to identify and deport people here illegally.

Sawyer delivered this short item on ABC’s June 18 World News:

An update on Arizona's controversial new anti-immigration law. A lot of reaction to a statement by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who said the Obama administration will sue that state of Arizona. Sources tell ABC News that the Justice Department is nearly done reviewing the law and barring anything unforeseen, is all but certain to take Arizona to court in the next few weeks.

By NewsBusters.org
June 21, 2010
Leave a Comment

ABC and NBC Describe Arizona Law as ‘Anti-Immigration’ and ‘Harsh’

Network anchors can’t resist misconstruing Arizona’s upcoming immigration enforcement law. The latest instances came Friday night when ABC and NBC caught up with news that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton told an interviewer in Ecuador that the Obama administration will sue to block the law.

Diane Sawyer erroneously described the anti-illegal immigration measure as “Arizona's controversial new anti-immigration law” while Lester Holt, filling in on the NBC Nightly News, characterized the law as “harsh,” relaying:

There's been a stir this week over something Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said in Ecuador earlier this month. She suggested the federal government would sue Arizona over its harsh new immigration law designed to identify and deport people here illegally.

Sawyer delivered this short item on ABC’s June 18 World News:

An update on Arizona's controversial new anti-immigration law. A lot of reaction to a statement by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who said the Obama administration will sue that state of Arizona. Sources tell ABC News that the Justice Department is nearly done reviewing the law and barring anything unforeseen, is all but certain to take Arizona to court in the next few weeks.

By NewsBusters.org
June 21, 2010
Leave a Comment

ABC and NBC Describe Arizona Law as ‘Anti-Immigration’ and ‘Harsh’

Network anchors can’t resist misconstruing Arizona’s upcoming immigration enforcement law. The latest instances came Friday night when ABC and NBC caught up with news that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton told an interviewer in Ecuador that the Obama administration will sue to block the law.

Diane Sawyer erroneously described the anti-illegal immigration measure as “Arizona's controversial new anti-immigration law” while Lester Holt, filling in on the NBC Nightly News, characterized the law as “harsh,” relaying:

There's been a stir this week over something Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said in Ecuador earlier this month. She suggested the federal government would sue Arizona over its harsh new immigration law designed to identify and deport people here illegally.

Sawyer delivered this short item on ABC’s June 18 World News:

An update on Arizona's controversial new anti-immigration law. A lot of reaction to a statement by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who said the Obama administration will sue that state of Arizona. Sources tell ABC News that the Justice Department is nearly done reviewing the law and barring anything unforeseen, is all but certain to take Arizona to court in the next few weeks.

By NewsBusters.org
June 15, 2010
Leave a Comment

Stephanopoulos Enchanted By Obama’s ‘Martial Language’ and ‘Feel of FDR’

President Barack Obama's Oval Office address about the oil leak in the Gulf of Mexico certainly impressed George Stephanopoulos, though that's not a difficult achievement for the favorably pre-disposed Democratic operative turned network political expert. ABC, CBS, Fox and NBC were all back to regular programming two minutes or less after Obama finished, but that was enough time for Stephanopoulos to display his delight. “What struck me tonight,” he informed ABC anchor Diane Sawyer, is:

Oval Office addresses are often used when the nation is at war and tonight the President used martial language. He talked about a “siege,” the “assault on our shores” and his “battle plan” to fix it. And he said we have to “rally together.”

The co-host of ABC's Good Morning America proceeded to relay, presuming the inspirational goal was met, that the White House was “reaching for” the “feel of Franklin Roosevelt during World War II and those fireside chats and the President even said that during World War II they said we couldn't build enough planes and tanks, but we did. We can beat this as well.”

To which, Sawyer chimed in by quoting liberal hero FDR: “Only thing we have to fear is fear itself.”

From immediately following Obama's 8 PM EDT speech on Tuesday night, June 15:

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: What struck me tonight, Diane, is you know those Oval Office addresses are often used when the nation is at war and tonight the President used martial language. He talked about a “siege,” the “assault on our shores” and his “battle plan” to fix it. And he said we have to “rally together.”

And I think what the White House was reaching for tonight is the feel of Franklin Roosevelt during World War II and those fireside chats and the President even said that during World War II they said we couldn't build enough planes and tanks, but we did. We can beat this as well.

DIANE SAWYER: “Only thing we have to fear is fear itself.”

By NewsBusters.org
June 10, 2010
Leave a Comment

ABC Gives Jerry Brown Platform to Declare Whitman Dangerous, ‘Soul of California is at Stake’

ABC anchor Diane Sawyer greeted Meg Whitman’s victory in California’s Republican gubernatorial primary by putting forward Democrat Jerry Brown as the savior protecting the nation against Whitman becoming Governor. “Jerry Brown told us today, he wants the country to know that he sees this as an epic duel in California between the politics of ideas and the power of money,” Sawyer warned from Los Angeles in setting up an interview with Brown aired on Wednesday’s World News. Sawyer later relayed how Brown “believes the soul of California is at stake.”

Condemning Whitman’s spending on ads, Brown charged “it's almost like a ministry of information in a totalitarian country,” before he offered up pablum, unchallenged by Sawyer, about how he’ll solve the Golden State’s $20 billion shortfall by telling “legislators you have to get did of your cars, get rid of your perks.”

Sawyer fondly recalled: “For 40 years we watched him – the son of a political family who studied to be a Jesuit priest, then turned Buddhist seeker. When he became governor, he lived in one room, bed on the floor, and rode around in his own Plymouth.” Now, “he says it's a singular time for a man who believes the soul of California is at stake. He remembers studying Buddhism in Japan.” Brown got the last word in ABC’s infomercial for him: “‘Life and death is a serious matter. Time waits for no man. Do your best.’ And that, I think, could be the spirit of this campaign.”

From the Wednesday, June 9 World News, transcript provided by the MRC’s Brad Wilmouth:

DIANE SAWYER: And, as you know, we are here in California, a state reeling from debt, with no easy solution in sight. And come November, former Democratic Governor Jerry Brown has decided to ride into the race for governor again. For the Republicans, as we said, the head of eBay, the former head of eBay, Meg Whitman, who spent $80 million of her own money and has plenty more to spend. She won a decisive primary victory last night. Well, Jerry Brown told us today, he wants the country to know that he sees this as an epic duel in California between the politics of ideas and the power of money.

SAWYER TO BROWN: You say we're talking about a "billionaire's demolition derby"?

FORMER GOVERNOR JERRY BROWN (D-CA), SPEAKING TO CROWD: A billionaire's demolition derby.

BROWN: Well, the ads. I think each day there are 500, 600 commercials throughout the state. It's almost like a ministry of information in a totalitarian country.

SAWYER: Do you really feel that this is changing us fundamentally in some big brother way?

BROWN: No, what I, I didn't mean, it's not big brother, it's that when you can dominate the airwaves, radio and television, and in the mail, just by buying it, not just for a few weeks, but for months on end, that is unprecedented. It's an unprecedented control of the channels of communication in a free society. And, yes, that is different. And it is ominous.

SAWYER: So far Meg Whitman spent about $80 million of her own money. How much money do you have to spend on ads?

BROWN: Well, I have $22 million in the bank, and I'm saving my pennies so hopefully we'll have more by the time we get to September.

SAWYER: 12.6 percent unemployment rate, $20 billion deficit in California. And California, as we know, drives a lot of the national economy.

BROWN: No, we're in trouble, and the country's in trouble.

SAWYER: But she has said specifically she's going to do it, she's going to give tax breaks to corporations and get them in by the boatloads into California to get the jobs back.

BROWN: She also said she's going to cut all the taxes on the rich. That will increase and exacerbate the gap. We got to cut that budget. We have to do it in a way that will bring the legislators on board.

SAWYER: But how can you cut it to $20 billion deficit? Are there enough cuts in the-

BROWN: You have to start. I'm going to start with the governor's office cutting. I'm going to tell those legislators you have to get did of your cars, get rid of your perks.

MEG WHITMAN, CALIFORNIA REPUBLICAN GUBERNATORIAL NOMINEE, SPEAKING TO CROWD: And I'm ready to give Jerry Brown the toughest election fight he's faced in his 40 years of politics!

SAWYER: Meg Whitman has said – in fact, she said last night, "I'm ready to give Jerry Brown the toughest election fight he's faced in his 40 years of politics."

BROWN: Well, I like the compliment that she notices that I have been around for awhile.

SAWYER: For 40 years we watched him – the son of a political family who studied to be a Jesuit priest, then turned Buddhist seeker. When he became governor, he lived in one room, bed on the floor, and rode around in his own Plymouth.

BROWN: I am frugal. I take care of my money very carefully. And I think people can understand, I'll take care of their money the same way.

SAWYER: And it's hard to believe that if he's elected, Jerry Brown will be the oldest governor in the nation, 72. You're up this morning already, you ran a mile?

BROWN: I've already run, yeah, did some chin-ups. I'm trying to, you know, keep in shape here. I've got a very tough competitor.

SAWYER: But he says it's a singular time for a man who believes the soul of California is at stake. He remembers studying Buddhism in Japan.

BROWN: Someone would intone, "Life and death is a serious matter. Time waits for no man. Do your best." And that, I think, could be the spirit of this campaign.

SAWYER: And, as we said, a critical election for California coming up. We asked Meg Whitman, by the way, for an interview today as well. She declined our request. We hope to speak to her soon.

Evening News Shows Enthuse Over Helen Thomas, a ‘Bona Fide Icon’ and a ‘Trailblazer’

The three evening news shows on Monday treated the announcement of Helen Thomas' retirement as an occasion to gush over the "bona fide icon" and "trailblazer." At the same time, CBS's Evening News, NBC's Nightly News and ABC's World News didn't find much time for outrage over Thomas' attacks on Jews and Israel.

Instead, NBC's Andrea Mitchell played a clip of Thomas ranting to President Bush in a White House Press briefing: "Are you going to get out of Afghanistan? Why are we continuing to kill and die there?" According to Mitchell, this was Thomas simply being "outspoken."

On CBS, correspondent Sharyl Attkisson labeled these sort of comments "confrontational." It was Thomas' suggestion, caught on video, that Jews should "go home" to Poland and "get the hell out of Palestine" that "many" thought "crossed the line from feisty to offensive." She then played a clip of the remarks.

ABC's Dan Harris was the most effusive, lauding, " She is a bona fide icon and she is also nearly 90-years-old." [Audio available here.]

Harris also provided spin for Thomas, citing her age and celebrity: "Some have argued that Thomas deserves a break, given her status as a journalistic giant and a trailblazer for women, and given her age." He added, "After all, many of us have elderly relatives who have lost their verbal filter."

World News host Diane Sawyer contributed to this tone, teasing the segment by cryptically asserting, "Helen Thomas, dean of White House correspondents resigns, amid a debate about age and outrage." Maybe ABC saw the debate as one over "age and outrage," but many Americans felt it concerned anti-Semitic comments.

Mitchell used similar language for her report: "Now an occasional columnist, Thomas was often criticized but still venerated as a trailblazer, the first woman to lead the White House press corps." Speaking of the White House Correspondents Association, She hopefully concluded, "Her colleagues added that they are saddened by Thomas' recent comments, but wish her the best."

Evening News anchor Katie Couric hyped that Thomas had "blazed the trail for women in journalism."

All three programs played the video that brought the longtime journalist's career to the end. But, none featured clips from outraged groups. Where were the interviews with the Anti-Defamation League or other Jewish groups?

Finally, none of the shows highlighted the extreme left-wing bias of Thomas, something that the reporter herself admitted in 2006: "I’m a liberal, I was born a liberal, and I will be a liberal ‘til the day I die." For a compilation of Thomas' most outragous comments, go here.

A transcript of the June 7 Nightly News segment and a partial transcript of the World News piece follow:

7:09

BRIAN WILLIAMS: In Washington today, a sudden end to one of the longest careers in the history of the White House press corps and in the modern era of journalism. Helen Thomas, who will turn 90 this summer, started covering JFK 50 years ago. But something she said 11 days ago about Jews and Israel sparked a storm that led to her departure. The story tonight from NBC's Andrea Mitchell.

ANDREA MITCHELL: Helen Thomas has been giving presidents a hard time for half a century.

BARACK OBAMA: All right. Helen, this is my inaugural moment here. I'm really excited.

MITCHELL: Originally entitled to a front row seat as a legendary wire service reporter-

RICHARD NIXON: Miss Thomas has the first question tonight.

MITCHELL: -President Obama is only the last of 10 presidents to get the full Thomas treatment.

THOMAS: Are you going to get out of Afghanistan? Why are we continuing to kill and die there? What is the real excuse? And don't give us this Bushism.

MITCHELL: Always outspoken about the Middle East.

THOMAS: Your decision to invade Iraq has caused the deaths of thousands of Americans and Iraqis.

MITCHELL: This time she went too far when a blogger at a Jewish heritage event asked her about Israel.

[clip]

THOMAS: Tell them to get the hell out of Palestine.

OFF CAMERA VOICE: : Ooh. Any better comments than that?

THOMAS: Remember, these people are occupied. And it's their land, not German, it's not Poland.

OFF CAMERA VOICE: So where should they go? What should they do?

THOMAS: They go home.

OFF CAMERA VOICE: Where's their home?

THOMAS: Poland, Germany.

OFF CAMERA VOICE: So the Jews should--say Jews go back to Poland and Germany?

THOMAS: And America and everywhere else.

MITCHELL: A firestorm erupted after the blogger, Rabbilive.com, posted this video on YouTube. Today the White House condemned her comments.

ROBERT GIBBS: Those remarks were offensive and reprehensible.

MITCHELL: Now an occasional columnist, Thomas was often criticized but still venerated as a trailblazer, the first woman to lead the White House press corps. President Obama feted her on her 89th birthday last August. Now Thomas has apologized on her Web site, saying she deeply regrets the comments. In a statement tonight, the White House Correspondents Association said Helen Thomas has had a long and distinguished career that is unrivaled, along the way shattering many glass ceilings. Her colleagues added that they are saddened by Thomas' recent comments, but wish her the best. Andrea Mitchell, NBC News, Washington.

World News

6/7/10

6:30 tease

SAWYER: Retiring. Helen Thomas, dean of White House correspondents resigns, amid a debate about age and outrage.

6:45

DIANE SAWYER: And today, the long career of White House reporter Helen Thomas, a familiar face, came to an abrupt end amid criticism and controversy. What happened to the 89-year-old fixture in the front row of the briefings? Here’s Dan Harris.

DAN HARRIS, ABC correspondent: Helen Thomas has covered every president since Kennedy, and was the only reporter ever to have an assigned seat in the White House briefing room. She is a bona fide icon and she is also nearly 90-years-old. Today her seat sat empty after a controversy over these recent comments she made about Israel.

HELEN THOMAS, former "Hearst" columnist: Tell them to get the hell out of Palestine.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: So where should they go?

THOMAS: They should go home.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Where`s the home?

THOMAS: Poland. Germany.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: You told the Jews -- do you think...

HARRIS: Thomas, whose parents were Lebanese immigrants, was harshly criticized. She apologized but the criticism did not relent, and so today her employer, "Hearst," announced her resignation. Some have argued that Thomas deserves a break, given her status as a journalistic giant and a trailblazer for women, and given her age. After all, many of us have elderly relatives who have lost their verbal filter.

Evening News Shows Enthuse Over Helen Thomas, a ‘Bona Fide Icon’ and a ‘Trailblazer’

The three evening news shows on Monday treated the announcement of Helen Thomas' retirement as an occasion to gush over the "bona fide icon" and "trailblazer." At the same time, CBS's Evening News, NBC's Nightly News and ABC's World News didn't find much time for outrage over Thomas' attacks on Jews and Israel.

Instead, NBC's Andrea Mitchell played a clip of Thomas ranting to President Bush in a White House Press briefing: "Are you going to get out of Afghanistan? Why are we continuing to kill and die there?" According to Mitchell, this was Thomas simply being "outspoken."

On CBS, correspondent Sharyl Attkisson labeled these sort of comments "confrontational." It was Thomas' suggestion, caught on video, that Jews should "go home" to Poland and "get the hell out of Palestine" that "many" thought "crossed the line from feisty to offensive." She then played a clip of the remarks.

ABC's Dan Harris was the most effusive, lauding, " She is a bona fide icon and she is also nearly 90-years-old."

Harris also provided spin for Thomas, citing her age and celebrity: "Some have argued that Thomas deserves a break, given her status as a journalistic giant and a trailblazer for women, and given her age." He added, "After all, many of us have elderly relatives who have lost their verbal filter."

World News host Diane Sawyer contributed to this tone, teasing the segment by cryptically asserting, "Helen Thomas, dean of White House correspondents resigns, amid a debate about age and outrage." Maybe ABC saw the debate as one over "age and outrage," but many Americans felt it concerned anti-Semitic comments.

Mitchell used similar language for her report: "Now an occasional columnist, Thomas was often criticized but still venerated as a trailblazer, the first woman to lead the White House press corps." Speaking of the White House Correspondents Association, She hopefully concluded, "Her colleagues added that they are saddened by Thomas' recent comments, but wish her the best."

Evening News anchor Katie Couric hyped that Thomas had "blazed the trail for women in journalism."

All three programs played the video that brought the longtime journalist's career to the end. But, none featured clips from outraged groups. Where were the interviews with the Anti-Defamation League or other Jewish groups?

Finally, none of the shows highlighted the extreme left-wing bias of Thomas, something that the reporter herself admitted in 2006: "I’m a liberal, I was born a liberal, and I will be a liberal ‘til the day I die." For a compilation of Thomas' most outragous comments, go here.

A transcript of the June 7 Nightly News segment and a partial transcript of the World News piece follow:

7:09

BRIAN WILLIAMS: In Washington today, a sudden end to one of the longest careers in the history of the White House press corps and in the modern era of journalism. Helen Thomas, who will turn 90 this summer, started covering JFK 50 years ago. But something she said 11 days ago about Jews and Israel sparked a storm that led to her departure. The story tonight from NBC's Andrea Mitchell.

ANDREA MITCHELL: Helen Thomas has been giving presidents a hard time for half a century.

BARACK OBAMA: All right. Helen, this is my inaugural moment here. I'm really excited.

MITCHELL: Originally entitled to a front row seat as a legendary wire service reporter-

RICHARD NIXON: Miss Thomas has the first question tonight.

MITCHELL: -President Obama is only the last of 10 presidents to get the full Thomas treatment.

THOMAS: Are you going to get out of Afghanistan? Why are we continuing to kill and die there? What is the real excuse? And don't give us this Bushism.

MITCHELL: Always outspoken about the Middle East.

THOMAS: Your decision to invade Iraq has caused the deaths of thousands of Americans and Iraqis.

MITCHELL: This time she went too far when a blogger at a Jewish heritage event asked her about Israel.

[clip]

THOMAS: Tell them to get the hell out of Palestine.

OFF CAMERA VOICE: : Ooh. Any better comments than that?

THOMAS: Remember, these people are occupied. And it's their land, not German, it's not Poland.

OFF CAMERA VOICE: So where should they go? What should they do?

THOMAS: They go home.

OFF CAMERA VOICE: Where's their home?

THOMAS: Poland, Germany.

OFF CAMERA VOICE: So the Jews should--say Jews go back to Poland and Germany?

THOMAS: And America and everywhere else.

MITCHELL: A firestorm erupted after the blogger, Rabbilive.com, posted this video on YouTube. Today the White House condemned her comments.

ROBERT GIBBS: Those remarks were offensive and reprehensible.

MITCHELL: Now an occasional columnist, Thomas was often criticized but still venerated as a trailblazer, the first woman to lead the White House press corps. President Obama feted her on her 89th birthday last August. Now Thomas has apologized on her Web site, saying she deeply regrets the comments. In a statement tonight, the White House Correspondents Association said Helen Thomas has had a long and distinguished career that is unrivaled, along the way shattering many glass ceilings. Her colleagues added that they are saddened by Thomas' recent comments, but wish her the best. Andrea Mitchell, NBC News, Washington.

World News

6/7/10

6:30 tease

SAWYER: Retiring. Helen Thomas, dean of White House correspondents resigns, amid a debate about age and outrage.

6:45

DIANE SAWYER: And today, the long career of White House reporter Helen Thomas, a familiar face, came to an abrupt end amid criticism and controversy. What happened to the 89-year-old fixture in the front row of the briefings? Here’s Dan Harris.

DAN HARRIS, ABC correspondent: Helen Thomas has covered every president since Kennedy, and was the only reporter ever to have an assigned seat in the White House briefing room. She is a bona fide icon and she is also nearly 90-years-old. Today her seat sat empty after a controversy over these recent comments she made about Israel.

HELEN THOMAS, former "Hearst" columnist: Tell them to get the hell out of Palestine.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: So where should they go?

THOMAS: They should go home.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Where`s the home?

THOMAS: Poland. Germany.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: You told the Jews -- do you think...

HARRIS: Thomas, whose parents were Lebanese immigrants, was harshly criticized. She apologized but the criticism did not relent, and so today her employer, "Hearst," announced her resignation. Some have argued that Thomas deserves a break, given her status as a journalistic giant and a trailblazer for women, and given her age. After all, many of us have elderly relatives who have lost their verbal filter.

Evening News Shows Enthuse Over Helen Thomas, a ‘Bona Fide Icon’ and a ‘Trailblazer’

The three evening news shows on Monday treated the announcement of Helen Thomas' retirement as an occasion to gush over the "bona fide icon" and "trailblazer." At the same time, CBS's Evening News, NBC's Nightly News and ABC's World News didn't find much time for outrage over Thomas' attacks on Jews and Israel.

Instead, NBC's Andrea Mitchell played a clip of Thomas ranting to President Bush in a White House Press briefing: "Are you going to get out of Afghanistan? Why are we continuing to kill and die there?" According to Mitchell, this was Thomas simply being "outspoken."

On CBS, correspondent Sharyl Attkisson labeled these sort of comments "confrontational." It was Thomas' suggestion, caught on video, that Jews should "go home" to Poland and "get the hell out of Palestine" that "many" thought "crossed the line from feisty to offensive." She then played a clip of the remarks.

ABC's Dan Harris was the most effusive, lauding, " She is a bona fide icon and she is also nearly 90-years-old."

Harris also provided spin for Thomas, citing her age and celebrity: "Some have argued that Thomas deserves a break, given her status as a journalistic giant and a trailblazer for women, and given her age." He added, "After all, many of us have elderly relatives who have lost their verbal filter."

World News host Diane Sawyer contributed to this tone, teasing the segment by cryptically asserting, "Helen Thomas, dean of White House correspondents resigns, amid a debate about age and outrage." Maybe ABC saw the debate as one over "age and outrage," but many Americans felt it concerned anti-Semitic comments.

Mitchell used similar language for her report: "Now an occasional columnist, Thomas was often criticized but still venerated as a trailblazer, the first woman to lead the White House press corps." Speaking of the White House Correspondents Association, She hopefully concluded, "Her colleagues added that they are saddened by Thomas' recent comments, but wish her the best."

Evening News anchor Katie Couric hyped that Thomas had "blazed the trail for women in journalism."

All three programs played the video that brought the longtime journalist's career to the end. But, none featured clips from outraged groups. Where were the interviews with the Anti-Defamation League or other Jewish groups?

Finally, none of the shows highlighted the extreme left-wing bias of Thomas, something that the reporter herself admitted in 2006: "I’m a liberal, I was born a liberal, and I will be a liberal ‘til the day I die." For a compilation of Thomas' most outragous comments, go here.

A transcript of the June 7 Nightly News segment and a partial transcript of the World News piece follow:

7:09

BRIAN WILLIAMS: In Washington today, a sudden end to one of the longest careers in the history of the White House press corps and in the modern era of journalism. Helen Thomas, who will turn 90 this summer, started covering JFK 50 years ago. But something she said 11 days ago about Jews and Israel sparked a storm that led to her departure. The story tonight from NBC's Andrea Mitchell.

ANDREA MITCHELL: Helen Thomas has been giving presidents a hard time for half a century.

BARACK OBAMA: All right. Helen, this is my inaugural moment here. I'm really excited.

MITCHELL: Originally entitled to a front row seat as a legendary wire service reporter-

RICHARD NIXON: Miss Thomas has the first question tonight.

MITCHELL: -President Obama is only the last of 10 presidents to get the full Thomas treatment.

THOMAS: Are you going to get out of Afghanistan? Why are we continuing to kill and die there? What is the real excuse? And don't give us this Bushism.

MITCHELL: Always outspoken about the Middle East.

THOMAS: Your decision to invade Iraq has caused the deaths of thousands of Americans and Iraqis.

MITCHELL: This time she went too far when a blogger at a Jewish heritage event asked her about Israel.

[clip]

THOMAS: Tell them to get the hell out of Palestine.

OFF CAMERA VOICE: : Ooh. Any better comments than that?

THOMAS: Remember, these people are occupied. And it's their land, not German, it's not Poland.

OFF CAMERA VOICE: So where should they go? What should they do?

THOMAS: They go home.

OFF CAMERA VOICE: Where's their home?

THOMAS: Poland, Germany.

OFF CAMERA VOICE: So the Jews should--say Jews go back to Poland and Germany?

THOMAS: And America and everywhere else.

MITCHELL: A firestorm erupted after the blogger, Rabbilive.com, posted this video on YouTube. Today the White House condemned her comments.

ROBERT GIBBS: Those remarks were offensive and reprehensible.

MITCHELL: Now an occasional columnist, Thomas was often criticized but still venerated as a trailblazer, the first woman to lead the White House press corps. President Obama feted her on her 89th birthday last August. Now Thomas has apologized on her Web site, saying she deeply regrets the comments. In a statement tonight, the White House Correspondents Association said Helen Thomas has had a long and distinguished career that is unrivaled, along the way shattering many glass ceilings. Her colleagues added that they are saddened by Thomas' recent comments, but wish her the best. Andrea Mitchell, NBC News, Washington.

World News

6/7/10

6:30 tease

SAWYER: Retiring. Helen Thomas, dean of White House correspondents resigns, amid a debate about age and outrage.

6:45

DIANE SAWYER: And today, the long career of White House reporter Helen Thomas, a familiar face, came to an abrupt end amid criticism and controversy. What happened to the 89-year-old fixture in the front row of the briefings? Here’s Dan Harris.

DAN HARRIS, ABC correspondent: Helen Thomas has covered every president since Kennedy, and was the only reporter ever to have an assigned seat in the White House briefing room. She is a bona fide icon and she is also nearly 90-years-old. Today her seat sat empty after a controversy over these recent comments she made about Israel.

HELEN THOMAS, former "Hearst" columnist: Tell them to get the hell out of Palestine.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: So where should they go?

THOMAS: They should go home.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Where`s the home?

THOMAS: Poland. Germany.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: You told the Jews -- do you think...

HARRIS: Thomas, whose parents were Lebanese immigrants, was harshly criticized. She apologized but the criticism did not relent, and so today her employer, "Hearst," announced her resignation. Some have argued that Thomas deserves a break, given her status as a journalistic giant and a trailblazer for women, and given her age. After all, many of us have elderly relatives who have lost their verbal filter.

Evening News Shows Enthuse Over Helen Thomas, a ‘Bona Fide Icon’ and a ‘Trailblazer’

The three evening news shows on Monday treated the announcement of Helen Thomas' retirement as an occasion to gush over the "bona fide icon" and "trailblazer." At the same time, CBS's Evening News, NBC's Nightly News and ABC's World News didn't find much time for outrage over Thomas' attacks on Jews and Israel.

Instead, NBC's Andrea Mitchell played a clip of Thomas ranting to President Bush in a White House Press briefing: "Are you going to get out of Afghanistan? Why are we continuing to kill and die there?" According to Mitchell, this was Thomas simply being "outspoken."

On CBS, correspondent Sharyl Attkisson labeled these sort of comments "confrontational." It was Thomas' suggestion, caught on video, that Jews should "go home" to Poland and "get the hell out of Palestine" that "many" thought "crossed the line from feisty to offensive." She then played a clip of the remarks.

ABC's Dan Harris was the most effusive, lauding, " She is a bona fide icon and she is also nearly 90-years-old."

Harris also provided spin for Thomas, citing her age and celebrity: "Some have argued that Thomas deserves a break, given her status as a journalistic giant and a trailblazer for women, and given her age." He added, "After all, many of us have elderly relatives who have lost their verbal filter."

World News host Diane Sawyer contributed to this tone, teasing the segment by cryptically asserting, "Helen Thomas, dean of White House correspondents resigns, amid a debate about age and outrage." Maybe ABC saw the debate as one over "age and outrage," but many Americans felt it concerned anti-Semitic comments.

Mitchell used similar language for her report: "Now an occasional columnist, Thomas was often criticized but still venerated as a trailblazer, the first woman to lead the White House press corps." Speaking of the White House Correspondents Association, She hopefully concluded, "Her colleagues added that they are saddened by Thomas' recent comments, but wish her the best."

Evening News anchor Katie Couric hyped that Thomas had "blazed the trail for women in journalism."

All three programs played the video that brought the longtime journalist's career to the end. But, none featured clips from outraged groups. Where were the interviews with the Anti-Defamation League or other Jewish groups?

Finally, none of the shows highlighted the extreme left-wing bias of Thomas, something that the reporter herself admitted in 2006: "I’m a liberal, I was born a liberal, and I will be a liberal ‘til the day I die." For a compilation of Thomas' most outragous comments, go here.

A transcript of the June 7 Nightly News segment and a partial transcript of the World News piece follow:

7:09

BRIAN WILLIAMS: In Washington today, a sudden end to one of the longest careers in the history of the White House press corps and in the modern era of journalism. Helen Thomas, who will turn 90 this summer, started covering JFK 50 years ago. But something she said 11 days ago about Jews and Israel sparked a storm that led to her departure. The story tonight from NBC's Andrea Mitchell.

ANDREA MITCHELL: Helen Thomas has been giving presidents a hard time for half a century.

BARACK OBAMA: All right. Helen, this is my inaugural moment here. I'm really excited.

MITCHELL: Originally entitled to a front row seat as a legendary wire service reporter-

RICHARD NIXON: Miss Thomas has the first question tonight.

MITCHELL: -President Obama is only the last of 10 presidents to get the full Thomas treatment.

THOMAS: Are you going to get out of Afghanistan? Why are we continuing to kill and die there? What is the real excuse? And don't give us this Bushism.

MITCHELL: Always outspoken about the Middle East.

THOMAS: Your decision to invade Iraq has caused the deaths of thousands of Americans and Iraqis.

MITCHELL: This time she went too far when a blogger at a Jewish heritage event asked her about Israel.

[clip]

THOMAS: Tell them to get the hell out of Palestine.

OFF CAMERA VOICE: : Ooh. Any better comments than that?

THOMAS: Remember, these people are occupied. And it's their land, not German, it's not Poland.

OFF CAMERA VOICE: So where should they go? What should they do?

THOMAS: They go home.

OFF CAMERA VOICE: Where's their home?

THOMAS: Poland, Germany.

OFF CAMERA VOICE: So the Jews should--say Jews go back to Poland and Germany?

THOMAS: And America and everywhere else.

MITCHELL: A firestorm erupted after the blogger, Rabbilive.com, posted this video on YouTube. Today the White House condemned her comments.

ROBERT GIBBS: Those remarks were offensive and reprehensible.

MITCHELL: Now an occasional columnist, Thomas was often criticized but still venerated as a trailblazer, the first woman to lead the White House press corps. President Obama feted her on her 89th birthday last August. Now Thomas has apologized on her Web site, saying she deeply regrets the comments. In a statement tonight, the White House Correspondents Association said Helen Thomas has had a long and distinguished career that is unrivaled, along the way shattering many glass ceilings. Her colleagues added that they are saddened by Thomas' recent comments, but wish her the best. Andrea Mitchell, NBC News, Washington.

World News

6/7/10

6:30 tease

SAWYER: Retiring. Helen Thomas, dean of White House correspondents resigns, amid a debate about age and outrage.

6:45

DIANE SAWYER: And today, the long career of White House reporter Helen Thomas, a familiar face, came to an abrupt end amid criticism and controversy. What happened to the 89-year-old fixture in the front row of the briefings? Here’s Dan Harris.

DAN HARRIS, ABC correspondent: Helen Thomas has covered every president since Kennedy, and was the only reporter ever to have an assigned seat in the White House briefing room. She is a bona fide icon and she is also nearly 90-years-old. Today her seat sat empty after a controversy over these recent comments she made about Israel.

HELEN THOMAS, former "Hearst" columnist: Tell them to get the hell out of Palestine.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: So where should they go?

THOMAS: They should go home.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Where`s the home?

THOMAS: Poland. Germany.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: You told the Jews -- do you think...

HARRIS: Thomas, whose parents were Lebanese immigrants, was harshly criticized. She apologized but the criticism did not relent, and so today her employer, "Hearst," announced her resignation. Some have argued that Thomas deserves a break, given her status as a journalistic giant and a trailblazer for women, and given her age. After all, many of us have elderly relatives who have lost their verbal filter.

Evening News Shows Enthuse Over Helen Thomas, a ‘Bona Fide Icon’ and a ‘Trailblazer’

The three evening news shows on Monday treated the announcement of Helen Thomas' retirement as an occasion to gush over the "bona fide icon" and "trailblazer." At the same time, CBS's Evening News, NBC's Nightly News and ABC's World News didn't find much time for outrage over Thomas' attacks on Jews and Israel.

Instead, NBC's Andrea Mitchell played a clip of Thomas ranting to President Bush in a White House Press briefing: "Are you going to get out of Afghanistan? Why are we continuing to kill and die there?" According to Mitchell, this was Thomas simply being "outspoken."

On CBS, correspondent Sharyl Attkisson labeled these sort of comments "confrontational." It was Thomas' suggestion, caught on video, that Jews should "go home" to Poland and "get the hell out of Palestine" that "many" thought "crossed the line from feisty to offensive." She then played a clip of the remarks.

ABC's Dan Harris was the most effusive, lauding, " She is a bona fide icon and she is also nearly 90-years-old."

Harris also provided spin for Thomas, citing her age and celebrity: "Some have argued that Thomas deserves a break, given her status as a journalistic giant and a trailblazer for women, and given her age." He added, "After all, many of us have elderly relatives who have lost their verbal filter."

World News host Diane Sawyer contributed to this tone, teasing the segment by cryptically asserting, "Helen Thomas, dean of White House correspondents resigns, amid a debate about age and outrage." Maybe ABC saw the debate as one over "age and outrage," but many Americans felt it concerned anti-Semitic comments.

Mitchell used similar language for her report: "Now an occasional columnist, Thomas was often criticized but still venerated as a trailblazer, the first woman to lead the White House press corps." Speaking of the White House Correspondents Association, She hopefully concluded, "Her colleagues added that they are saddened by Thomas' recent comments, but wish her the best."

Evening News anchor Katie Couric hyped that Thomas had "blazed the trail for women in journalism."

All three programs played the video that brought the longtime journalist's career to the end. But, none featured clips from outraged groups. Where were the interviews with the Anti-Defamation League or other Jewish groups?

Finally, none of the shows highlighted the extreme left-wing bias of Thomas, something that the reporter herself admitted in 2006: "I’m a liberal, I was born a liberal, and I will be a liberal ‘til the day I die." For a compilation of Thomas' most outragous comments, go here.

A transcript of the June 7 Nightly News segment and a partial transcript of the World News piece follow:

7:09

BRIAN WILLIAMS: In Washington today, a sudden end to one of the longest careers in the history of the White House press corps and in the modern era of journalism. Helen Thomas, who will turn 90 this summer, started covering JFK 50 years ago. But something she said 11 days ago about Jews and Israel sparked a storm that led to her departure. The story tonight from NBC's Andrea Mitchell.

ANDREA MITCHELL: Helen Thomas has been giving presidents a hard time for half a century.

BARACK OBAMA: All right. Helen, this is my inaugural moment here. I'm really excited.

MITCHELL: Originally entitled to a front row seat as a legendary wire service reporter-

RICHARD NIXON: Miss Thomas has the first question tonight.

MITCHELL: -President Obama is only the last of 10 presidents to get the full Thomas treatment.

THOMAS: Are you going to get out of Afghanistan? Why are we continuing to kill and die there? What is the real excuse? And don't give us this Bushism.

MITCHELL: Always outspoken about the Middle East.

THOMAS: Your decision to invade Iraq has caused the deaths of thousands of Americans and Iraqis.

MITCHELL: This time she went too far when a blogger at a Jewish heritage event asked her about Israel.

[clip]

THOMAS: Tell them to get the hell out of Palestine.

OFF CAMERA VOICE: : Ooh. Any better comments than that?

THOMAS: Remember, these people are occupied. And it's their land, not German, it's not Poland.

OFF CAMERA VOICE: So where should they go? What should they do?

THOMAS: They go home.

OFF CAMERA VOICE: Where's their home?

THOMAS: Poland, Germany.

OFF CAMERA VOICE: So the Jews should--say Jews go back to Poland and Germany?

THOMAS: And America and everywhere else.

MITCHELL: A firestorm erupted after the blogger, Rabbilive.com, posted this video on YouTube. Today the White House condemned her comments.

ROBERT GIBBS: Those remarks were offensive and reprehensible.

MITCHELL: Now an occasional columnist, Thomas was often criticized but still venerated as a trailblazer, the first woman to lead the White House press corps. President Obama feted her on her 89th birthday last August. Now Thomas has apologized on her Web site, saying she deeply regrets the comments. In a statement tonight, the White House Correspondents Association said Helen Thomas has had a long and distinguished career that is unrivaled, along the way shattering many glass ceilings. Her colleagues added that they are saddened by Thomas' recent comments, but wish her the best. Andrea Mitchell, NBC News, Washington.

World News

6/7/10

6:30 tease

SAWYER: Retiring. Helen Thomas, dean of White House correspondents resigns, amid a debate about age and outrage.

6:45

DIANE SAWYER: And today, the long career of White House reporter Helen Thomas, a familiar face, came to an abrupt end amid criticism and controversy. What happened to the 89-year-old fixture in the front row of the briefings? Here’s Dan Harris.

DAN HARRIS, ABC correspondent: Helen Thomas has covered every president since Kennedy, and was the only reporter ever to have an assigned seat in the White House briefing room. She is a bona fide icon and she is also nearly 90-years-old. Today her seat sat empty after a controversy over these recent comments she made about Israel.

HELEN THOMAS, former "Hearst" columnist: Tell them to get the hell out of Palestine.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: So where should they go?

THOMAS: They should go home.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Where`s the home?

THOMAS: Poland. Germany.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: You told the Jews -- do you think...

HARRIS: Thomas, whose parents were Lebanese immigrants, was harshly criticized. She apologized but the criticism did not relent, and so today her employer, "Hearst," announced her resignation. Some have argued that Thomas deserves a break, given her status as a journalistic giant and a trailblazer for women, and given her age. After all, many of us have elderly relatives who have lost their verbal filter.

The Attorney General vs. BP: Little Skepticism on ABC & NBC, While Lefty Talker Blasts Holder As ‘Corporatist’ Phony

The American lawyers who flock to Guantanamo Bay to represent captured terrorists are simply fulfilling their duty to provide representation, it is often argued by those who seem to enjoy mucking up efforts to curtail future terrorism. But once representing the American beverage giant Coca Cola makes Attorney General Eric Holder a “corporatist” who’s going to “do the Devil’s work” and only “pretend” to go tough on BP after the oil spill, lefty talk radio host Mike Malloy (a onetime CNN news writer) argued Wednesday night. (Audio here.)

I guess you know this by now, the, uh, Justice Department under Eric Holder who defended, uh, was it Coca-Cola, against murder charges in, uh, South America? Good old Eric Holder, another corporatist, who, uh, is going to do the Devil’s work now and pretend that he is conducting a criminal investigation into the events that led to the oil gush?

For their part, the big three network evening newscasts reported Holder’s announcement of a “criminal investigation” against BP during their Tuesday night broadcasts, but only CBS’s Chip Reid struck what could be called a skeptical note about the Obama administration’s motives in publicly touting the investigation after a week of criticism about the federal government’s less-than-effective handling of the matter.

“The barrage of attacks on BP may be motivated in part by politics,” Reid assessed on the June 1 Evening News, an attempt to make the company “a villain to distract from a growing chorus of criticism of the President who has visited the Gulf only twice in 43 days.”

On ABC, anchor Diane Sawyer was much milder, asking whether “declaring BP a potential enemy” might “make it harder” for the administration to work with them on a solution. (Ever the Obama sycophant, George Stephanopoulos assured her that threatening BP would actually make things better.) And on NBC, correspondent Anne Thompson offered no second-guessing of the administration, just a couple of sentences matter-of-factly noting Holder’s announcement.

Here’s more of how the network evening newscasts covered Holder on Tuesday, arranged from the least skeptical (NBC) to most skeptical (CBS):

ANNE THOMPSON: This environmental disaster is now the focus of the Justice Department, confirming today both criminal and civil investigations into the oil rig explosion and the crude that now taints Louisiana’s coast.

Mr. ERIC HOLDER: We will prosecute to the fullest extent of the law anyone who has violated the law.

#ABC's World News

DIANE SAWYER: If the administration is now declaring BP a potential enemy here, what does this do to the cleanup? Does it make it harder?

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: Well that’s the question I asked the Attorney General. And he said quite the contrary. Not only does BP have an interest to clean this up for their own reasons, but also that that would be taken to account in any civil or criminal proceeding, but there’s a lot of politics at play here as well, Diane. The White House, the administration believes that BP hasn’t been fully straight in all their press conferences and they don’t want to get saddled with BP’s problems.

# CBS Evening News

CHIP REID: The barrage of attacks on BP may be motivated in part by politics.

JOHN DICKERSON, POLITICAL ANALYST: This administration is doing what every administration under fire does, which is to defend themselves, and then also deflect the blame to someone else. Here they’ve got a ready villain, and that’s BP.

REID: A villain to distract from a growing chorus of criticism of the President who has visited the Gulf only twice in 43 days. Even some supporters of the President including General Colin Powell have criticized his slow response....The relationship between the White House and BP has clearly moved into a new and hostile phase, leaving many people wondering how they`re going to work together to respond to this disaster.

The Attorney General vs. BP: Little Skepticism on ABC & NBC, While Lefty Talker Blasts Holder As ‘Corporatist’ Phony

The American lawyers who flock to Guantanamo Bay to represent captured terrorists are simply fulfilling their duty to provide representation, it is often argued by those who seem to enjoy mucking up efforts to curtail future terrorism. But once representing the American beverage giant Coca Cola makes Attorney General Eric Holder a “corporatist” who’s going to “do the Devil’s work” and only “pretend” to go tough on BP after the oil spill, lefty talk radio host Mike Malloy (a onetime CNN news writer) argued Wednesday night. (Audio here.)

I guess you know this by now, the, uh, Justice Department under Eric Holder who defended, uh, was it Coca-Cola, against murder charges in, uh, South America? Good old Eric Holder, another corporatist, who, uh, is going to do the Devil’s work now and pretend that he is conducting a criminal investigation into the events that led to the oil gush?

For their part, the big three network evening newscasts reported Holder’s announcement of a “criminal investigation” against BP during their Tuesday night broadcasts, but only CBS’s Chip Reid struck what could be called a skeptical note about the Obama administration’s motives in publicly touting the investigation after a week of criticism about the federal government’s less-than-effective handling of the matter.

“The barrage of attacks on BP may be motivated in part by politics,” Reid assessed on the June 1 Evening News, an attempt to make the company “a villain to distract from a growing chorus of criticism of the President who has visited the Gulf only twice in 43 days.”

On ABC, anchor Diane Sawyer was much milder, asking whether “declaring BP a potential enemy” might “make it harder” for the administration to work with them on a solution. (Ever the Obama sycophant, George Stephanopoulos assured her that threatening BP would actually make things better.) And on NBC, correspondent Anne Thompson offered no second-guessing of the administration, just a couple of sentences matter-of-factly noting Holder’s announcement.

Here’s more of how the network evening newscasts covered Holder on Tuesday, arranged from the least skeptical (NBC) to most skeptical (CBS):

ANNE THOMPSON: This environmental disaster is now the focus of the Justice Department, confirming today both criminal and civil investigations into the oil rig explosion and the crude that now taints Louisiana’s coast.

Mr. ERIC HOLDER: We will prosecute to the fullest extent of the law anyone who has violated the law.

#ABC's World News

DIANE SAWYER: If the administration is now declaring BP a potential enemy here, what does this do to the cleanup? Does it make it harder?

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: Well that’s the question I asked the Attorney General. And he said quite the contrary. Not only does BP have an interest to clean this up for their own reasons, but also that that would be taken to account in any civil or criminal proceeding, but there’s a lot of politics at play here as well, Diane. The White House, the administration believes that BP hasn’t been fully straight in all their press conferences and they don’t want to get saddled with BP’s problems.

# CBS Evening News

CHIP REID: The barrage of attacks on BP may be motivated in part by politics.

JOHN DICKERSON, POLITICAL ANALYST: This administration is doing what every administration under fire does, which is to defend themselves, and then also deflect the blame to someone else. Here they’ve got a ready villain, and that’s BP.

REID: A villain to distract from a growing chorus of criticism of the President who has visited the Gulf only twice in 43 days. Even some supporters of the President including General Colin Powell have criticized his slow response....The relationship between the White House and BP has clearly moved into a new and hostile phase, leaving many people wondering how they`re going to work together to respond to this disaster.

ABC Touts Calderon’s ‘Sharp Words’ Swipe at U.S. for Inadequate Gun Laws

With “Sharp Words” forming the on-screen graphic, ABC anchor Diane Sawyer on Thursday night championed the domestic gun control argument espoused by a foreign leader trying to shift the blame for his nation's criminal activity, a remark neither CBS nor NBC found newsworthy:

Mexico's President Felipe Calderon today challenged a joint session of Congress on gun control, asking that they reinstate a ban on assault weapons, which expired in 2004, saying 80 percent of the traceable weapons used in those crimes in Mexico, right across the border, come from the U.S.

Viewers then heard from Calderon: “I admire the American Constitution, but many of these guns are not going to honest American hands. Instead, thousands are ending up in the hands of criminals.”

Without questioning his statistical claim, Sawyer then observed “Democrats gave him a standing ovation” while “Republicans sat silently,” a disparity which illustrated how Calderon's polemics, which ABC decided to highlight, matches a quest of liberal Democrats.

From the Thursday, May 20 ABC World News:

DIANE SAWYER: And Mexico's President Felipe Calderon today challenged a joint session of Congress on gun control, asking that they reinstate a ban on assault weapons, which expired in 2004, saying 80 percent of the traceable weapons used in those crimes in Mexico, right across the border, come from the U.S.

CALDERON: I admire the American Constitution, but many of these guns are not going to honest American hands. Instead, thousands are ending up in the hands of criminals.

SAWYER: Democrats gave him a standing ovation. Republicans sat silently.

Voters Throwing Out Pols Who Work Across Party Lines, Stephanopoulos Frets

After ABC's Jonathan Karl painted Senator Arlen Specter's (D-R-D-PA) troubles as emblematic of how “the national anti-incumbent wave has hit Pennsylvania” (complete with a matching full screen graphic), George Stephanopoulos fretted on World News about how voters say “they want the parties to work together, yet they seem to be most against now the Senators, the incumbents, who did work across party lines.”

He cited the single incumbent who has lost – “Bob Bennett in Utah worked with a Democrat on health care” – then raised Specter, touting how “he's been in both parties,” as if that's something noble, before naming “Blanche Lincoln, down in Arkansas, a centrist Democrat. She's in a lot of trouble tonight.” Here's a possibility: Those upset by pro-big government politicians and insider coziness bailing out their donors are out voting and are not the same people who incessantly yap about “bi-partisanship.”

ABC stumbled into that as anchor Diane Sawyer marveled: “And the driving center of this, is the bailout?” Stephanopoulos confirmed: “The biggest issue by far is the bailouts. That's what's fueling so much voter anger out there.”

(On Sunday's World News, in an interview recorded during a Senate subway ride with Bennett, Karl cued up the outgoing Senator to denounce the Tea Party activists:

Is there a risk though that this movement, the movement which targeted you for defeat, is going to push the Republican Party in such a direction that it's just not going to be electable?)

From the Monday, May 17 ABC World News, starting where Sawyer crediting Stephanopoulos for catching a supposed irony:

DIANE SAWYER: You were telling me an interesting, ironic turn of events – that everybody said that they wanted compromise, they wanted collegiality.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: They want the parties to work together, yet they seem to be most against now the Senators, the incumbents, who did work across party lines. Bob Bennett in Utah worked with a Democrat on health care, loses the primary in the Republican Party. Arlen Specter, the ultimate ID, he's been on both, he's been in both parties. He's worked. He's been an independent. Blanche Lincoln, down in Arkansas, a centrist Democrat. She's in a lot of trouble tonight.

SAWYER: And the driving center of this, is the bailout?

STEPHANOPOULOS: The biggest issue by far is the bailouts. That's what's fueling so much voter anger out there. They see politicians taking care of the powerful, taking care of the insiders. They're saying “what are they doing for us?”

Big Three Nets’ Evening News Dives Deepen

NBCABCCBSchartGraphicFive weeks ago (covered at NewsBusters; at BizzyBlog), the Big Three Networks' combined evening news audiences dropped to below 20 million -- an audience about 5% less than what Matt Drudge in the summer of 2006 headlined as “TV’s Lowest Week.”

Three weeks ago (at NewsBusters; at BizzyBlog), their combined audience came in at 19.61 million, down over 12% from the previous year.

For the week of May 3, the combined total fell further, to the point where they're one more really bad week away from hitting an all-time low -- a low that was "achieved" in mid-June of last year (Source -- Media Bistro, week of May 3, 2010; week of May 4, 2009):

BigThreeNetsRatings050310v050409

The May 3, 2010 combined total audience is less than 2% higher than the 19.06 million of June 15, 2009. The 25-54 demo audience is less than 200,000 above that same week.

Those who properly point out that the audience figures cited here are much larger than seen on cable news networks can take some comfort and solace in the following:

  • Just 10 years ago, the nets' evening news audience was about 12 million larger in a country with a population that was about 9% smaller.
  • At this point, it's likely that many people who continue to watch these shows, other than the brave souls at the Media Research Center who do it so the rest of us don't have to, are lost causes to conservatism. Otherwise, they couldn't bear sitting through what Brian, Diane, and Katie constantly feed them. The fact that their numbers are shrinking may mean that more people are open to sensible conservative arguments.
  • Though it's difficult to gauge, it seems that right and center-right new media outlets are gathering a bit of a head of steam compared to the leftist counterparts.

Anyway, the regularly scheduled summer viewing slump is only a month away. Two words: Faster please.

Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com.

Only CBS IDs Kagan as on Left; Others Tout Her as ‘Powerhouse,’ ‘Accomplished Poker Player, Opera Lover’ Who ‘Loves Softball’

In quite a contrast to the immediate tagging of the Bush and Obama Supreme Court nominees as “conservative” (and that includes Sonya Sotomayor), on Monday night ABC and NBC refrained from applying any ideological description to Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan while CBS snuck in one. CBS's Jan Crawford declared “her career has put her solidly on the left,” but contended “she will have significant conservative support among academics and lawyers” and warned “that support alarms some liberals.”

Amongst the non-ideological superlatives: ABC's Diane Sawyer trumpeted the “historic nomination” of the “five foot three inch powerhouse,” CBS's Crawford insisted “her interests reflect her openness. She loves softball and poker” (poker reflects “openness”?) and NBC's Pete Williams hailed her as an “accomplished poker player, opera lover.”

ABC, CBS and NBC all highlighted Kagan's high school yearbook picture of her in a robe and holding a gavel (ABC's Moran: “Even in high school, check out her yearbook photo here, she had her sights set on the high court”), but none pointed out the explicitly very liberal polemical points she made just a year or two later, nor did CNN's The Situation Room.

As FNC's Shannon Bream pointed out on Special Report, in The Daily Princetonian, Kagan lamented “the success of those she called, quote, 'anonymous but Moral Majority-backed avengers of innocent life.' Kagan also said she looked forward to a time when a, quote, 'more leftist left will once again come to the fore.'”

The MSM didn't have to rely on FNC for Kagan's record. A New York Times story posted Monday afternoon reported Kagan campaigned for left wing Democrat Liz Holtzman and quoted Kagan, also from the Princeton student newspaper, as denouncing then-incoming U.S. Senator Alfonse D'Amato, who beat Holtzman, as “an ultraconservative” as she fretted the supposed demise of “real Democrats — not the closet Republicans that one sees so often these days but men and women committed to liberal principles and motivated by the ideal of an affirmative and compassionate government.”

Comparisons to past nominees:

Flashback to Flashback: Nets Were Quick to Tag Alito and Roberts as 'Ultra' and 'Hardline' 'Conservatives'

Sotomayor Flashback #1 of 3: On First Night She Prompted More 'Conservative' Than 'Liberal' Labels

Sotomayor Flashback #2 of 3: On 2nd Night, CBS Decided Sotomayor No Liberal: 'Can't Be Easily Defined by Political Labels'

Sotomayor Flashback #3 of 3: Cloaked as 'Both Sides,' Nets Pushed 'Abortion Rights' Advocates' Concerns

As close as the networks skated to ideological labeling in their Monday night, May 10 stories:

Terry Moran, on ABC's World News:

....She was a gifted student at public schools in New York, then Princeton undergrad, Oxford post-grad and Harvard law. Even in high school, check out her yearbook photo here, she had her sights set on the high court....

At Harvard she outraged conservatives by leading the fight to keep the schools ban on military recruiters on campus in protest of the Pentagon's don't ask/don't tell policy, but she hired conservatives to teach at liberal Harvard too....

Jan Crawford, who had Kagan as a professor at the University of Chicago law school, on the CBS Evening News:

....In high school, Kagan was a leader, serving as student council president. She left no doubt about her wishes to become a judge....

She clerked on the Supreme Court for liberal giant Thurgood Marshall. She has called him her hero....

The President said he tapped Kagen for her 'keen intellect,' her leadership skills and her ability to build consensus. Her interests reflect her openness. She loves softball and poker. Obama first met Kagan when they were both professors at the University of Chicago law school. As dean at Harvard, she won approval from conservatives by hiring bright young scholars like Jack Goldsmith, a top official in the Bush administration....

Her career has put her solidly on the left. She worked as a lawyer in the Clinton White House, but she will have significant conservative support among academics and lawyers. Michael McConnell was a leading conservative judge.

McCONNELL: Most lawyers of conservative bent as well as moderates or liberals will see this as an outstanding appointment.

That support alarms some liberals who worry she is weak on issues of executive power and the war on terror and hasn't been forceful enough in her positions on the court....

Pete Williams on the NBC Nightly News:

....Judging from her high school yearbook, she had early aspirations to wield a gavel. Classmates say she was a standout in a school of over-achievers....

After Princeton and Harvard law school, she clerked for Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall who called her Shorty. For most of the 1990s, she taught law at the University of Chicago where she met a young Barack Obama, a part time faculty member. She served President Clinton as a lawyer and policy adviser and later became the first woman dean of Harvard law. She diversified the faculty, hiring prominent conservatives. But her tenure included controversy. She enforced a long-standing anti-discrimination policy, blocking military recruiters from the law school because of the Pentagon's ban on gays in the military....
    
Accomplished poker player, opera lover....

From FNC's Special Report with Bret Baier:

SHANNON BREAM: ...Though she lacks a paper trail of legal opinions, as far back as her college days Kagan has left behind other writings, like her senior thesis from Princeton which focused on the socialist movement of the early 20th century. She called its demise, quote, “a sad but also a chastening one for those who, more than half a century after socialism's decline, still wish to change America.”

DOUG KENDALL, CONSTITUTIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY CENTER: I think what she was doing was writing a college thesis about a social movement, and not endorsing or opposing that movement at that point.

BREAM: Indeed the professor who oversaw Kagan's research for that thesis calls her, quote, “the furthest thing from a socialist.” Also while at Princeton, Kagan wrote an opinion piece for the student newspaper saying she, quote, “absorbed liberal principles early,” and went on to lament the success of those she called, quote, “anonymous but moral majority-backed avengers of innocent life.” Kagan also said she looked forward to a time when a, quote, “more leftist left will once again come to the fore.”...

ABC’s Moran Claims Conservatives Backing Kagan, No Peep of Criticism During Special Report

During ABC’s live coverage of President Obama’s nomination of Elena Kagan to the Supreme Court, Diane Sawyer and a quartet of correspondents failed to find a single thing to criticize about the new nominee. Instead, Sawyer touted it as a “history making day” (although why is unclear, since she's the fifth woman to be nominated), and touted Kagan as a feminist “trailblazer” and a “conciliator” between “the conservative and liberal wings of the Court.”

Good Morning America co-anchor George Stephanopoulos agreed Kagan had a “reputation for bringing conservatives and liberals together,” and recounted how he and Kagan worked side-by-side in Bill Clinton’s White House: “She does have a great temperament, very easy-going, a good sense of humor.” Then, as Kagan and President Obama strode to the podium, Sawyer quoted the nominee complimenting herself: “We had a soundbite from her saying she had a reputation for being a very good teacher.”

After the President and Kagan spoke, Capitol Hill correspondent Jonathan Karl noted how Republican Senators Orrin Hatch and Jon Kyl, who had supported Kagan for her current post as Solicitor General, were not going to automatically support her for the Supreme Court. But Nightline co-anchor Terry Moran disputed the notion that Kagan would have a difficult fight, citing the White House as evidence that conservatives were rallying to Kagan: “The White House does think that, despite what Jon is saying, she is strong, she’s got support of conservatives in and out of Washington, and she’ll make it.”

Kagan has already been criticized for taking an extreme liberal position in barring the military from recruiting at Harvard Law School while she was in charge. But neither that flap nor any other criticism of Kagan made it into ABC’s live coverage this morning. Instead, Sawyer noted how Kagan “loves opera,” while Stephanopoulos told viewers that former Justice Thurgood Marshall affectionately called her “Shorty” when she clerked for him in the 1980s.

Here’s a transcript of ABC’s correspondents on air just before and after her official nomination by the President:

DIANE SAWYER: We’re interrupting your programming for a few minutes because this is another history-making day. President Obama is about to introduce Solicitor General Elena Kagan as his nominee to the Supreme Court, his second female nomination to the Court. She is 50 years old, which would make her by five years the youngest person on the Court. She’s also a trailblazer — the first female dean of Harvard Law School, and the first female Solicitor General, which is the post from which the lawyer argues on behalf of the United States. In fact, she’s argued six times before the Supreme Court. And Good Morning America anchor George Stephanopoulos is with me this morning. George, tell us what you know.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: Well, Diane, you mentioned a lot of Elena Kagan’s background. One of the things she hasn’t been is a federal judge, which will come up in her confirmation hearings. But it’s remarkable how embedded she is in President Obama’s world. Like him, she went to Harvard Law School, taught at the University of Chicago’s Law School, where they taught together. She worked for Vice President Biden during Justice Ginsberg’s confirmation hearings. She worked with many of President Obama’s top aides in the Clinton White House, and she even clerked for one of President Obama’s heroes, Justice Thurgood Marshall, and one of his mentors, Judge Abner Mikva. So she is deeply embedded in his world. You can say they are sympatico.

SAWYER: That’s right, but she was not a judge, as you point out, which is  another groundbreaking move — first time that’s happened in about 40 years. And we’re told by the way on Thurgood Marshall, the towering Justice of the Court, called her “Shorty,” because she’s only 5'3" tall. I want to bring in Jake Tapper — he’s right there in the room where the announcement will be made. Jake?

JAKE TAPPER: Good morning, Diane, and good morning, George. Well, the President made his call to Solicitor General Kagan yesterday at roughly 8pm Eastern. Among the decisions — among the reasons for his decision, as you mentioned, the fact that she comes from outside what’s called the judicial monastery. She does come from the experience of an appellate court judge. And all her other would-be colleagues are former appellate court judges. In addition, of course, is that trailblazing career. She has a reputation for tremendous intellect and, when she was at Harvard Law School, she also developed the reputation as something of a consensus builder, somebody who could bring liberals and conservatives together. And though, of course this will be a contentious confirmation process, she does come to the table with that reputation, Diane.

SAWYER: And, how about that, George? She is expected to play a role as somewhat of a conciliator, the bridge across the conservative and liberal wings of the Court. In fact, she loves opera, which Justice Scalia loves. She had Justice Scalia come to Harvard when she was there, for dinner.

STEPHANOPOULOS: And she spars — she did — and she spars with him, when she argues before the Court. She has a very open, good engaging relationship with him. As Jake pointed out, she had a reputation for bringing conservatives and liberals together at Harvard Law School, when she was dean. I actually worked with her in the Clinton White House, and she does have a great temperament, very easy-going, a good sense of humor. And in her policy work, has reached across party lines on several occasions.

SAWYER: She talked once, we had a soundbite from her saying she had a reputation for being a very good teacher, and here she is:

[OBAMA AND KAGAN SPEAK]

SAWYER: Standing in the East Room, an audience of staff, Kagan family members, applauding for the new nominee for the Supreme Court, Elena Kagan, the Solicitor General. And the President cited her appreciation of diverse views, that she understands the stories of peoples’ lives behind the law. And he also heralded the fact that she would be the third woman on the Court, and will make the Court more inclusive, more representative of us as people. George, but that continues the Ivy League sweep of the Court, right?

STEPHANOPOULOS: Not only Ivy League, New York as well. The President has now appointed two Justices in a row from New York City. Of course, one’s a Met’s fan, as he pointed out, and one’s a Yankee’s fan.

What was interesting about Elena Kagan’s remarks there — she fleshed out her own personal story, but didn’t give many clues to her own, what her judicial philosophy might be, and that is going to be something that comes up a lot in the confirmation hearings, because she hasn’t been a judge, she doesn’t have much of a paper trail, no books, just a few law review articles, which could actually be an advantage in the confirmation fight ahead, which is going to stretch through the summer.

SAWYER:  I want to bring in Jonathan Karl on Capitol Hill, because we know there were seven Republicans who voted to confirm her as Solicitor General. Jon, will they be on board again?

JONATHAN KARL: Don’t count on it, Diane. Already, two of the prominent conservatives who voted yes, John Kyl and Orrin Hatch, are out with statements saying don’t expect them to vote yes this time. They’re going to look at this new. And regarding what what George just said about her lack of a record on her judicial philosophy, Orrin Hatch, who voted yes for Solicitor General, said “My conclusion will be based on evidence, not blind faith.” A reference to the fact that she does not have much of a record on those judicial questions.

SAWYER: And we know that Justice Sotomayor took only three months, so any sense of the timing, Jon?

KARL: Well, Democrats on that committee are absolutely committed to having her confirmed by the Senate before the Senate goes on its August recess.

SAWYER: And, for a quick final thought, Terry Moran, who covers the Supreme Court for us. Terry?

TERRY MORAN: Well, Diane, the two factors that really went into this nomination — Elena Kagan’s confirmability, the White House does think that, despite what Jon is saying, she is strong, she’s got support of conservatives in and out of Washington, and she’ll make it. And, likeabilty — one of the things she’s demonstrated at the institutions that she’s been at, at Harvard Law School, in the Clinton administration, at the Solicitor General’s office, is an openness to people of different views, as President Obama said. And, I saw her first argument here, ever, in the Citizens United case, that campaign finance case. She’d never argued before a court before, she was at ease, and also very informal. She, despite the seriousness of the matter, she charmed the Justices a little bit, which I think President Obama hopes she can do if she gets up there.

Bozell Column: Charlie Crist Wasn’t ‘Purged’

Everyone knows that the quickest way to become a popular Republican in the media’s eyes is to denounce the Republicans as too extreme and conservative. The latest example is Florida Gov. Charlie Crist, who became an instant media sensation when he abandoned his dreadfully losing GOP campaign for the U.S. Senate to run as an independent. Chris Matthews pushed the storyline as a “Stalinesque purge” of moderates.

Obama strategist David Axelrod crowed about how great the Democrats looked as a result: “We have a big tent. They have a lean-to now.” This, from the party that hasn’t tolerated a pro-life presidential or vice-presidential nominee since Jimmy Carter tried to straddle the fence in 1976. This, from the liberals who are presently trying to “purge” Sen. Blanche Lincoln in a Democratic primary in Arkansas. This, from the party that successfully purged Sen. Joe Lieberman from its ranks.

Media liberals even blatantly declared the sky was green and the grass was blue by calling Crist a “rising star” of the Republican Party. It’s quite obvious that Crist’s star had left a big crater in the dirt. Still, before Crist announced he was leaving the party, ABC’s George Stephanopoulos warned: “A GOP star set to announce he's abandoning the Party to run as an independent.” That’s because the “rising star” went virtually overnight from 30 points ahead to 30 points behind.

The story writes itself. The key word for conservatives on NBC’s “Today” show was – yep – “intolerant.” Co-host Meredith Vieira asked Crist: “Did you desert the party or is this a case where the party has become so intolerant it no longer has room for a moderate voice?” She put the same question to Republican candidate Marco Rubio: “Is this a case where he has deserted the party or once again has your party become so intolerant that it doesn't have room for moderate voices?”

These journalists are either totally naive or dishonest. Either way, they are creating a false impression. There’s a difference between a “purge” and the popular will.  Stand for election, and then accept the results. Crist pledged to do that just weeks ago, to campaign for Rubio if he lost the primary. But he quit instead, and enabled the media to suggest there’s a “purge,” that conservatives “forced” him out. Just a few days ago, Washington Post columnist Dana Milbank was still suggesting conservatives “forced out” Sen. Arlen Specter, when he also looked dreadful polls in the face and switched parties.

It’s absolutely fascinating to see all the people who throw “quitter” mud at Sarah Palin for resigning her office in Alaska have absolutely no contempt for the cravenness and cowardice of Crist and Specter refusing to stand in a primary election. If you really thought an allegedly “tolerant” Obama-hugging Republican Party was worth fighting for, then why quit the party when your polls go south?

The media spin was much different when Sen. Joe Lieberman chose to remain in his primary election in 2006, and he lost by just four points to Ned Lamont. When he subsequently decided to run as an independent, the media weren’t asking if the Democrats were too “intolerant” for moderates like Lieberman. They treated Lieberman like a selfish traitor.

On ABC, Diane Sawyer scolded, "Senator, I heard you say 'I'm a Democrat.' But you're talking about running as an independent and there are members of the party who've already said, commentators, that this is a selfish decision. How can you run against the party?...You're going to be all alone out there.”

He beat Lamont in the general election, 49 percent to 40.

The media never saw in Lamont’s primary win a dangerous sign of growing extremism on the Democratic side, that crazy socialist bloggers and Iraq protesters were forcing a “purge” of the careerist moderates. They antiseptically called Lamont “antiwar,” and even presented him as a “fiscal conservative” and a “foreign-policy moderate.”

Four years ago, Washington Post columnist E. J. Dionne described Lieberman's problem on National Public Radio: "I think he misread that for a lot of Democrats, the moral issue of this time is where you stand on George Bush." Offering any support or granting any comfort to Bush was seen as immoral, not just politically unwise.

But today, the media are going out of their way to avoid the idea that Crist’s eroding poll numbers have anything to do with the growing political toxicity of Barack Obama – not just among Republicans, but among the independent voters Crist will be seeking. 

By NewsBusters.org
April 29, 2010
Leave a Comment

CBS Ignores, NBC Reports and ABC Frets Over Supreme Court Ruling of Mojave Cross

Given the contentious debate over the proper role of religion in American public life, you'd think an important Supreme Court ruling on the issue would be a big story to the network news. But the Court's April 28 finding regarding a cross on a World War I memorial in the Mojave Desert elicited a yawn from CBS's "Evening News," a 78-word report from NBC's "Nightly News," and a one-sided segment from ABC's "World News with Diane Sawyer" that fretted if the Court "move[d] the bar on the separation of church and state."

The cross in question is part of a memorial built in 1934 in the federal-owned Mojave National Preserve to honor fallen WWI veterans. Lower courts ruled the cross unconstitutional and had it covered with a box, despite efforts taken in recent years by Congress to avoid constitutional questions over it by transferring that portion of the Preserve to private owners.

In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled this was not a clear-cut violation of the separation of church and state.

"The goal of avoiding governmental endorsement does not require eradication of all religious symbols in the public realm," wrote Justice Anthony Kennedy in the majority opinion. Kennedy noted specifically about this cross that it "evokes far more than religion. It evokes thousands of small crosses in foreign fields marking the graves of Americans who fell in battles, battles whose tragedies are compounded if the fallen are forgotten."

ABC's Terry Moran examined the ruling in an April 28 "World News" segment and focused only on the "dismayed" reactions of those opposed to the cross. Neither soundbite in the segment came from anybody who was happy with the ruling.

Frank Buono, the former National Park Service employee who first raised the question about the cross told ABC, "It's a symbol of death and sacrifice only in the extent that it symbolizes the death and sacrifice of Jesus Christ. I mean, this is as religious as it gets."

Barry Lynn of Americans United for Separation of Church and State called the ruling "an example of a bad trend" and accused the Supreme Court of not caring about "religious minorities and non-believers."

Moran pointed out that the Supreme Court "ruling sends the case back down to lower courts," but failed to note that the ruling doesn't allow the cross to be uncovered. He also did not note that the issue of religious symbols on war memorials is still not completely settled.

Kelly Shackleford of the Liberty Institute, an organization that seeks protection of religious freedom, outlined to OneNewsNow the work that still needs to be done to settle the issue.

"We've got to go back down to the district court and still get a ruling taking this box off. And then additionally, the issue is still open as to whether veterans' memorials that have religious imagery should be left alone or whether the ACLU can continue to file these kinds of attacks," he explained.

By NewsBusters.org
April 23, 2010
Leave a Comment

Biden and Bo with TV’s Endearing and Cuddly Moments at the Obama White House

Never missing a chance to highlight events that make Team Obama seem to be loveable characters, ABC and NBC on Thursday night showcased endearing and cuddly moments with Joe Biden and First Dog Bo. You can decide which one is endearing and which one is cuddly.

ABC’s Diane Sawyer took time to marvel at how “we heard on The View today that it was the President who told” Joe Biden “we heard” Biden calling “the health care reform a big you know what deal” when “of course he didn't know that his microphone was so sensitive,” and NBC’s Brian Williams showed video of Bo barking at First Lady Michelle Obama:

If you're a dog owner, then you know there are times when they want your attention and they do not like that you're talking to other people or doing something else. It only means that you are not loving them at that given moment. Well, that's pretty much what happened today with the Obama's dog Bo while the First Lady was talking about her life and her job with some visiting students.

(Later, Williams featured a full story on Google's “earth-friendly lawn care” solution -- goats -- as Anne Thompson gushed “this is one time speed doesn't matter at Google as it opts for an animal footprint instead of a carbon one.”)

Back to Bo, NBC Nightly News viewers saw video of Michelle Obama, with Bo, in front of a group of kids:

The notion of being First Lady of the United States, you know, there have never been anybody in my race who had been here. [To a barking Bo] I know. I know. All right. You're going to have to go. You ready to go? Are you ready to go?

Williams added: “The kids all got to pet Bo. They were there, by the way, as part of take our daughters and sons to work day. We also learned today that daughter Malia's issue is saving the world's tigers and the First Lady, put it gently, that they talk about that issue as a family these days at least once a week.”

From the April 22 World News on ABC:

DIANE SAWYER: Remember when Vice President Biden called the health care reform a big you know what deal? Of course he didn't know that his microphone was so sensitive. We heard on The View today that it was the President who told him, we heard it.

JOE BIDEN, ON THE VIEW: And we gotten off in the limo to go over to another event. And he was laughing like the devil. I said, “what’s so funny? I don’t see anything funny about this.” And he said, well, he said, “Katie, my secretary, told me when you said that to me, everybody could hear it.” I was, “oh, God all mighty.”

Earlier: “Enchanted Matthews Holds Up His Own 'Health Reform Is a BFD' T-Shirt

By NewsBusters.org
April 20, 2010
Leave a Comment

Big Three Nets’ Evening News Ratings Crater to Summer 2009 Levels Two Months Early

down_graph-blogthumbnailTwo weeks ago (noted at NewsBusters; at BizzyBlog), the combined audience for the Big Three Networks' Evening News shows for the week of March 29 fell to just below 20 million.

That audience was about 5% less than what Matt Drudge in the summer of 2006 headlined as "TV's Lowest Week."

The Big Three's combined audience crawled back above 20 million during the week of April 5. But Chris Ariens of Media Bistro noted earlier today that the figures for the week of April 12 were more reflective of "summertime viewing patterns" than what is supposedly peak spring viewing season.

He's right, and the decline from the same week last year is truly precipitous:

Big3EveningNews041210v041309

Ariens notes that the all-time low for evening news viewership (19.06 million overall, 5.49 million in the 25-54 demographic) occurred during the week of June 15, 2009 (he writes today that it was June 23, but that was the date of his related post last year). Last week's results were only 2.9% higher overall, and only 5.8% higher in the 25-54 demo.

The Media Bistro writer tries to blame this result on the general decline in TV use:

Summer viewing patterns are setting in early for the broadcast evening newscasts. The levels of people using television (PUTS) were down last week to the lowest levels since the week of July 13, 2009. As a result, all three shows were down week-to-week.

Okay, but it's springtime, not summer, and Mr. Ariens would have to demonstrate that PUTS is down by double digits from a year ago to be convincing. Notably, he didn't do that, nor did he provide a link.

The following paragraph from a post at Nielsen Wire, although it concerns the fourth quarter of 2009, seems to reach an opposite conclusion about TV viewership in general (bold is mine):

“The rise in simultaneous use of the web and TV gives the viewer a unique on-screen and off-screen relationship with TV programming,” said Nielsen Company media product leader Matt O’Grady. “The initial fear was that Internet and mobile video and entertainment would slowly cannibalize traditional TV viewing, but the steady trend of increased TV viewership alongside expanded simultaneous usage argues something quite different.”

It's hard to believe that the Big 3 Net's problem is that more people are turning off their TVs. It's that people are changing the channel away from Brian, Diane, and Katie. I'll leave it to readers to assess how much of the recent turn-away has to do with something I cited two weeks ago: "... more recent efforts at demonizing Tea Partiers, i.e., ordinary Americans."

And we haven't hit the dog days of summer yet.

Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com.

By NewsBusters.org
April 7, 2010
Leave a Comment

Nets Upset by Confederate Proclamation, But Skip Obama Planning to Cleanse ‘Islamic’ Terminology

Words, just words. But which ones excite journalists and which ones don't? A test case Wednesday night as ABC and NBC, matching the focus of CNN and MSNBC throughout the day, aired segments on controversy over Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell leaving condemnation of slavery out of a proclamation issued last week calling April “Confederate History Month,” but neither had any time for an AP report about how the Obama administration plans to eliminate from the National Security Strategy terms such as “militant Islamic radicalism.”   

FNC's Special Report with Bret Baier managed to cover outrage generated against both actions. Shannon Bream reported the administration may be:

[C]hanging language in the National Security Strategy, a document which was last modified under President George W. Bush in March 2006 and reads, quote: “The struggle against militant Islamic radicalism is the great ideological conflict of the early years of the 21st century.” The Obama White House will not comment on reports that a new version of the NSS could drop language like “Islamic radicalism.” But critics of the possible modification call the idea political correctness run amok...

Diane Sawyer teased at the top of the April 7 World News: “Virginia's Governor wants to celebrate Confederate history and not mention slavery?”

She set up the subsequent full story:

And now, we return to home, where the Governor of Virginia has created an eruption of a debate. He decided to declare this month Confederate History Month, raising an argument about two questions. Should the Confederacy be honored, and what if the proclamation never mentions one of the central reasons the South went to war? Here's Jon Karl.

On the NBC Nightly News, Brian Williams read this short item:

Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell apologized today for issuing a proclamation declaring April Confederate History Month, even though the proclamation contained no mention of slavery. McDonnell said today it was a mistake and apologized to citizens of the commonwealth who were offended or disappointed.

Wednesday's CBS Evening News didn't mention either topic.

By NewsBusters.org
April 5, 2010
Leave a Comment

Special Super-Sized Notable Quotables: Celebrating ObamaCare, Demonizing Its Opponents

This week, the MRC’s regular Notable Quotables newsletter, documenting the latest outrageous quotes from the liberal media from the past two weeks, could not fit in its normal 3-page format, so we created a super-sized special edition, “Celebrating ObamaCare, Demonizing Its Opponents.” It’s chock full of quotes touting the wonders of the liberal health care scheme, and slamming the Tea Party and other opponents as vicious racist thugs. The whole thing is posted at www.MRC.org; here’s a sample:

If You’re Anti-ObamaCare, You Must Be a Bigot

“What are the Tea Partiers really angry about? Health care reform, or the fact that it was an African American President and a woman Speaker of the House who pushed through major change?” — MSNBC’s Chris Matthews at the top of Hardball, March 29.

Tea Partiers = George Wallace’s Racist Legacies

“The angry faces at Tea Party rallies are eerily familiar. They resemble faces of protesters lining the street at the University of Alabama in 1956 as Autherine Lucy, the school’s first black student, bravely tried to walk to class. Those same jeering faces could be seen gathered around the Arkansas National Guard troopers who blocked nine black children from entering Little Rock’s Central High School in 1957. ‘They moved closer and closer,’ recalled Elizabeth Eckford, one of the Little Rock Nine. ‘Somebody started yelling, “Lynch her! Lynch her!”’...Today’s Tea Party adherents are George Wallace legacies....The mobs of yesteryear were on the wrong side of history. Tea Party supporters and their right-wing fellow travelers are on the wrong side now. It shows up in their faces.” — The Washington Post’s Colbert I. King in a March 27 column.

Peaceful Tea Party Rally = Kristallnacht, 2010

“There’s nothing entertaining about watching goons hurl venomous slurs at congressmen like the civil rights hero John Lewis and the openly gay Barney Frank....How curious that a mob fond of likening President Obama to Hitler knows so little about history that it doesn’t recognize its own small-scale mimicry of Kristallnacht.” — New York Times columnist Frank Rich, March 28.

ObamaCare Opponents = Violent Thugs

“Opponents of the bill have been out today, and some of them pulled out all the stops. Protesters roaming Washington, some of them increasingly emotional, yelling slurs and epithets.” — ABC’s Diane Sawyer on World News, March 21.

“A year-long debate that’s been rancorous and mean from the start turned even nastier yesterday. Demonstrators protesting the bill poured into the halls of Congress shouting ‘Kill the bill!’ and ‘Made in the USSR.’ And as tempers rose, they hurled racial epithets, even at civil rights icon John Lewis of Georgia, and sexual slurs at Massachusetts Democrat Barney Frank. Other legislators said the protesters spit on them, and one lawmaker said it was like a page out of a time machine.” — Bob Schieffer leading off CBS’s Face the Nation, March 21.

Bottom Line on ObamaCare: We’re All Winners

“The uninsured are clearly the biggest beneficiaries of the legislation, which would extend the health care safety net for the lowest-income Americans....And yet, just about everyone might benefit from tighter insurance regulations....There is no question that the legislation should benefit consumers in various ways.” — New York Times reporter Tara Siegel Bernard in a front-page assessment of the new health care bill, March 22.

Seems Like a Lot More than a Kiss

“I am surprised that the numbers in the Washington Post poll weren’t better. I mean, since this thing passed last weekend, we’ve been seeing the longest wet kiss in political history given to the Obama administration by the liberal media elite, and every day it goes by, it’s sloppier.” — Governor Haley Barbour (R-MS) commenting on an ABC News/Washington Post poll showing 46% approving of ObamaCare vs. 50% opposed, ABC’s This Week, March 28.

By NewsBusters.org
April 3, 2010
Leave a Comment

Sawyer Champions ‘Super-Cop’ Regulator as ‘Gladiator’ Against Health Insurance Industry

ABC anchor Diane Sawyer, who in February demanded to know who will “keep insurance companies from jacking up premiums while making huge profits?”, on Friday found her champion in the Superintendent of Maine’s Bureau of Insurance, hailing Mila Kofman as a “super-cop” and a “gladiator” for rejecting a rate hike requested by Anthem Blue Cross.

Kofman proclaimed “we are the super-cops on the street. I take that responsibility as an insurance regulator very seriously,” a self-promotional description Sawyer adopted in her introduction, touting “a woman in Maine who is acting as a super-cop, and telling the insurance companies ‘no.’”

Reporter Bill Weir recounted how Kofman turned down an 18 percent increase in premiums for individual policies, allowing “11 percent. Enough for Anthem to cover their rising costs, but not enough to make a profit. She says they're doing just fine.” Presuming nefarious motives by insurance companies, Weir asserted the new health care law “depends on state regulators to keep them honest every day.”

Not until the very end of his one-sided story, which trumpeted how Kofman is “fighting” for Mainer’s “lifeline” and featured a liberal “consumer” advocate, did Weir get around to how the law in Maine forces “insure companies to cover anybody who applies, regardless of their health, but they don't have a mandate that everybody buys in. So there's not enough young people to carry the costs of those who need care.”  

The damage from regulations are even worse than that. As noted in a March 6 Maine Sunday Telegram article, the law mandates the same rates, regardless of risk, and has driven out of Maine all but two comapnies willing to sell policies to individuals:

A 1993 Maine law made it almost impossible for insurance companies to turn down customers or drop them because they are sick. And it said that all customers also must be charged roughly the same rates, regardless of risk.

Gradually, nearly all of the smaller insurance companies stopped selling coverage in Maine and focused on other markets. Today, one other private insurer, MEGA Life and Health Insurance Co., offers individual insurance...

And some individual policy holders are getting a lot of expensive care. Four percent of Anthem's individual subscribers account for 80 percent of the dollars paid out in claims, according to company officials.

The rising costs, and the fact that healthy people have to pay the same premiums as sick people, has led many to simply stop paying premiums. The number of Anthem's individual subscribers has dropped from 30,000 to about 20,000 in the past decade.

And, because there is now a higher proportion of sick people in the policy pool, premiums have to go up faster than costs, said Daniel Corcoran, president of Anthem in Maine.

Kofman, an associate research professor at Georgetown's Health Policy Institute, is a vetean of the Clinton administration where she spent four years, 1997-2001, at the Department of Labor working on state and federal health care initiatives. From her official bio:

In 2000, she was appointed Special Assistant to the Senior Health Care Advisor to the President at the White House to work on legislative and regulatory initiatives -- the Patient’s Bill of Rights, long-term care insurance, nursing home reform, and ERISA reform. In 2000, she was honored with the Labor Secretary’s Exceptional Achievement Award.

Sawyer’s recent targeting of health insurance companies:

February 23: “Sawyer Pleads: Who Will 'Keep Insurance Companies from Jacking Up Premiums While Making Huge Profits?'”

February 24: “ABC Pushes Obama's Insurance Demonization

March 9: “ABC and CBS Pass Along Sympathetic Anecdotes from Left-Wing Anti-Insurance Protest.”

The story on the Friday, April 2 World News on ABC:

DIANE SAWYER: There is a showdown taking place back here tonight between insurance companies trying to raise premiums on hard-hit policy holders, and some state officials who are determined to stop them. Bill Weir introduces us to a woman in Maine who is acting as a super-cop, and telling the insurance companies “no.”

BILL WEIR: [audio cut out] Maine, one of 29 states with the power to control the price of health insurance. But very few of those state regulators actually use their power.

ROBERT HUNTER, DIRECTOR OF INSURANCE, CONSUMER FEDERATION OF AMERICA: Historically, it's been 50 percent that came from the insurance companies and 50 percent go back to the insurance companies, so they're not going to be too tough on it.

WEIR: But Mila Kofman is different. With no ties to insurance, she was a professor who specialized in consumer protection.

MILA KOFMAN, SUPERINDENT OF INSURANCE, MAINE: We are the super-cops on the street. I take that responsibility as an insurance regulator very seriously.

WEIR: Her biggest battle is with Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield, which made a $33 million profit in Maine last year, but lost $2.3 million covering individuals who don't get coverage at work. The company asked to raise the premiums on those people by more than 18 percent. They want to raise it even more this year. But after running their numbers, Kofman said no. Limited the increase to just under 11 percent. Enough for Anthem to cover their rising costs, but not enough to make a profit. She says they're doing just fine. So, Anthem sued. And when a Portland judge brings his verdict next week, a lot of people will be watching, because while President Obama's new law requires insurance companies to publicly defend their price hikes, it depends on state regulators to keep them honest every day.

HUNTER: They’re going to have to really beef up both their laws and staffs so that they have the horses to actually regulate well.

KOFMAN: You have to give companies an opportunity to succeed in the private market, and you have to protect consumers who rely on that private market. For some, it's their lifeline to getting medical care.

WEIR: And she'll keep fighting for that lifeline. She just was sworn in for a new term today. As for Anthem of Maine, they sent us a long statement pointing to the laws in Maine, Diane. Since the mid-90s, they forced insure companies to cover anybody who applies, regardless of their health but they don't have a mandate that everybody buys in. So there's not enough young people to carry the costs of those who need care. But the system is so broken up there, about 40 percent of the families affected by these rate increases have a $30,000 deductible.

SAWYER: Already?

WEIR: Already. So they don't really even see anything that doesn't come out of their own pockets unless it’s catastrophic.

SAWYER: Thanks, Bill. She doesn't look like a gladiator, but everybody is watching her and the results of this case.

Online version: “Maine Regulator Gets Tough in Health Care Battleground; Mila Kofman of Maine Sees Herself as 'Super Cop' Policing the Price of Health Insurance”

By NewsBusters.org
April 2, 2010
Leave a Comment

Couric and Sawyer’s Ratings Plummet as Williams’ Rise

The folks at ABC and CBS News are certainly not humming Helen Reddy's "I Am Woman" this morning given the plummeting ratings of their respective evening anchors Diane Sawyer and Katie Couric.

Adding insult to injury, Brian Williams' numbers continue to climb.

So reported the New York Times Friday in a piece destined to raise some liberal media eyebrows:

[T]he ratings report for the first quarter of the year [showed] that [ABC's] evening newscast, “World News,” had sunk to the lowest numbers the program has had in a first quarter since the People Meter was introduced by Nielsen in 1987.

The same situation prevailed at CBS, where the “Evening News” also hit a new low for the months of January through March.

The beneficiary was NBC, where “Nightly News” scored its best first-quarter numbers since 2005.

Over all, the numbers were: 9.92 million viewers for NBC; 8.27 million for ABC and 6.45 million for CBS.

Ouch. 

Is this an industry problem? 

Not really. The number of viewers still watching the three shows together — more than 24 million in the first quarter — continue to dwarf any news program on cable.

But “World News” has had a falloff since Diane Sawyer took over for Charles Gibson. The show is down about 3 percent — 215,000 — from a year ago.

And, Couric's numbers have continued to fall since the excitement over her September 2006 debut as "CBS Evening News" anchor waned.

Yet, the Times piece chose to ignore the possibility that she was a bad hire at the time, especially given her lofty salary.

Was Couric really the best replacement for Bob Schieffer in 2006, or did CBS News just want to hire a woman regardless of her qualifications?

Is the same reverse sexism now being displayed at ABC News which after promoting Sawyer to "World News" anchor has recently announced that Christiane Amanpour will be the new host of Sunday's "This Week?"

To be sure, it's way too soon to call Sawyer a failure in her new roll. But Couric's numbers are dismal, and if Williams continues to attract new viewers as the ratings of "World" and "Evening" News decline, one has to wonder which network will blink first.

Ironically, if either Couric or Sawyer were to eventually be replaced by a man, you can be sure liberal media members across the country will blame sexism.

All together now, "I am woman, hear me roar. In numbers too big to ignore."

By NewsBusters.org
March 30, 2010
Leave a Comment

No Time for a Real Threat as ABC and CBS Skip Arrest of Man Targeting GOP’s Cantor

NBC on Monday night squeezed in a few seconds for the arrest of “a Philadelphia man for threatening the life of the number two Republican in the House of Representatives, Eric Cantor of Virginia.”

Yet after the networks led last week with less-immediate threats against Democrats, they weren’t so interested in a real case of a death threat against a Republican as neither CBS nor ABC aired a word about the arrest and NBC’s Brian Williams gave it short-shrift after leading last Wednesday with Democrats as the victims: “It's getting ugly as anger over health care reform erupts into some over-the-top rhetoric, including threats now against members of Congress.”

The next night, Williams still portrayed opponents as the only ones with miscreants amongst their ranks: “While the White House continues to celebrate its largest-ever legislative victory, opponents of health care reform have reacted to the final vote with anger, a few of them with threats of violence.”

CBS last week started with “threats of violence against Democrats who voted for health care reform” as Nancy Cordes relayed how “Democrats complain Sarah Palin is also using violent words and imagery.” On Monday, the CBS Evening News devoted a full story to fretting over a “loophole” which insurance companies may use to delay providing coverage to kids with pre-existing conditions and Katie Couric spent half a minute on how the New York Yankees are “the best-paid team in all of sports,” with the NBA “the highest-paid league” followed by cricket’s Indian Premier League.

Though Cantor’s district is beyond metro DC, ABC’s Washington, DC affiliate, WJLA-DT, led its 6 PM news Monday night with the arrest of  Norman Leboone, but a half hour later World News didn’t mention it as Diane Sawyer began with “homegrown hate, extremists from a Midwestern, Christian militia under arrest.” Five days earlier, a dire Sawyer warned “opposition to health care turns menacing,” asserting “angry opponents of the [health] bill unleashed threatening phone calls, scathing words, even bricks thrown through windows.”

Wednesday night, March 24: “Nets Lead with ‘Ugly’ and ‘Menacing’ ObamaCare Opponents Fueled by Palin’s ‘Violent Words and Imagery.’”

Thursday night, March 25: “Nets Not So Excited About Violence and Threats Aimed at ObamaCare Opponents.”

The short item from Williams on the Monday, March 29 NBC Nightly News:

The FBI said today they've arrested a Philadelphia man for threatening the life of the number two Republican in the House of Representatives, Eric Cantor of Virginia. 38-year-old Norman Leboone made a profanity-laced video that called Cantor evil and then some. He's being held without bail pending a psychiatric evaluation. The arrest is not related to a bullet hole found in Cantor's district office which police now say was caused instead by random gun fire.

By NewsBusters.org
March 26, 2010
Leave a Comment

‘Immigration Reform’ Rally Gets Major Diss from TV Networks

Left-wing protests for "immigration reform" (amnesty) used to be a huge TV-news story. MRC's 2006 special report Election in the Streets counted 309 stories in little more than two months. So it's a little surprising that Sunday's "pro-immigrant" protest received just a few seconds of attention.

It's better measured with a word count than a story count. ABC, CBS, and NBC combined gave it 239 words (or less than 80 words per network). NBC had 34 words, ABC 84, and CBS 141 (half a story).

This is 239 words more than the 2010 March for Life. Obviously, the timing was terrible, with the final vote on health "reform" scheduled. But you would think it would draw more than this. Perhaps the plugged-in Democrats like Stephanopoulos got a signal that focus on this issue wasn't helpful when voters are already angry with Democrats about health care. 

The president made a "surprise" video announcement for the rally, but none of the networks had any interest in video or verbiage from it. It's here. Obama touted how he marched with the lefties in Illinois in 2006. He touted the memory of Ted Kennedy: "Teddy's commitment to the cause never wavered, and neither has mine." 

NBC's 34 words came on Monday's Today. News anchor Natalie Morales skimmed over it: "In the midst of the health care battle, advocate for immigration reform rallied on the National Mall. President Obama told them he is still committed to working with Congress on the issue this year."

ABC was second with two brief stories totaling 84 words, one on Sunday's World News, and one on Monday's Good Morning America. This was the Sunday brief:

DIANE SAWYER: And there was a preview in Washington today of another major battle looming on the horizon, immigration reform. Tens of thousands of people marched to call attention to giving illegal immigrants a path to legal status, and in frustration that the Obama administration has not acted yet.

This was Monday's:

JUJU CHANG: Well, as the health care bill eked through Capitol Hill, thousands of marchers descended on the National Mall for another debate, immigration reform. President Obama sent a videotaped message vowing to work on the issue this year.

CBS offered the lengthiest coverage at half a story on Sunday night by reporter Bill Plante:

BILL PLANTE: ...Thousands of immigration white supporters rallied on the National Mall today urging President Obama to make good on his campaign pledge and urging Congress to reform the nation`s immigration laws.

JANET PARKER (Immigration Reform Activist): We believe that we`re getting their attention even if they`re voting on something else today.

LIZ TREBOLSI (Immigration Reform Activist): I'm here because it`s always a good time to fix a bad immigration system.

BILL PLANTE: But that would be another uphill fight and political observers don`t believe it`s in the cards.

LARRY SABATO: I hear them talking about immigration reform, I don`t believe it. I hear them talking about cap and trade, energy, I don`t believe it. There are just so many things that a Congress can produce in an election year.

BILL PLANTE: The public's biggest concerns, by far, are jobs and the economy and that's what the Obama White House will be talking about from now until November.

The latest media poll on immigration (at least at Pollingreport.com) is a CNN poll from last October. One question asked "Would you like to see the number of illegal immigrants currently in this country increased, decreased, or remain the same?" Only three percent said increased, and 22 percent picked "remain the same." Seventy-three percent picked "decreased."

They asked "Do you think the U.S. Census should or should not ask everyone living in this country whether they are legal residents of the United States?" That’s 88 percent yes, and 12 percent no.

There was this bizarre question suggesting that Americans are racially profiling Latinos they don’t know: "Suppose you were in your neighborhood and you saw a Latino man or woman who you did not know. Would you be most likely to assume that they were born in this country, that they immigrated to this country legally, or that they were an illegal immigrant?" Perhaps sensitive to the harsh implication, 68 percent picked the first two.

I’d tell the pollster "I don’t make assumptions like that about people I do not know."

By NewsBusters.org
March 23, 2010
Leave a Comment

Sawyer Claims Everyone Will Be Covered & Shows Kennedy’s Grave, CBS Displays Obama’s Signature: ‘What History Looks Like’

Getting carried away with her enthusiasm, Diane Sawyer opened ABC's World News on Tuesday night by proclaiming: “As of today, it is the law of the land that every man, woman and child in America will have health care coverage.” CBS's Harry Smith, however, filling in for Katie Couric, led by reporting the bill President Obama signed “will ensure that 94 percent of Americans have health insurance, the closest the nation has ever come to universal coverage.”

Later, Smith displayed Obama's signature as he trumpeted: “This is what history looks like, as it came from the hand of President Obama today with 22 different pen strokes comprising his signature.” (See screen shot after the jump)

Sawyer couldn't resist reminding viewers of the “Kennedy Legacy” (the on-screen tag) as she highlighted a photo of his son's grave side note: “You heard the President pay tribute to Senator Ted Kennedy, who devoted his career to health care reform. But there was another quiet tribute at the Senator's grave. A note left by his son, Congressman Patrick Kennedy. It said simply: 'Dad -- the unfinished business is done.'”

Late December: “ABC's Sawyer Touts Robert Byrd's Dedication to 'Health Care Champion' Kennedy

Sawyer led the Tuesday, March 23 World News on ABC:

Good evening. As of today, it is the law of the land that every man, woman and child in America will have health care coverage. And at the White House, the President signed the bill and marked this day in history, while Republican opponents marshaled forces, hoping to undo the law...

Smith began the CBS Evening News:

It took just a few strokes of a few pens to make health care reform a reality. President Obama today signed into law a bill that will ensure that 94 percent of Americans have health insurance, the closest the nation has ever come to universal coverage. But moments later, the attorneys general of 14 states -- all but one of them Republicans -- filed suit against the federal government claiming the law is unconstitutional...

Late in the newscast, as noted above, he took a few seconds to show Obama's signature:

This is what history looks like, as it came from the hand of President Obama today with 22 different pen strokes comprising his signature.

By NewsBusters.org
March 22, 2010
Leave a Comment

To ‘Indefatigable’ Pelosi, Sawyer Wonders What Her Dad and Mom ‘Would Have Said About this Moment?’

ABC anchor Diane Sawyer shared the glow of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's health policy victory, showing her, in an “ABC News exclusive” interview, a Washington Post with the headline of “Democrats Claim Health Votes” as she wondered: “What do you think your dad and your mom would have said about this moment?” Sawyer followed up: “Did your dad have a phrase, a sentence that meant the most to you when he'd say it to you, or your mom?” Pelosi's answer, “make sure you have the votes,” cracked up Sawyer, who chuckled: “No so sentimental.”

Sawyer framed her sit-down by trumpeting Pelosi's power, teasing at the top of World News: “Our exclusive interview with the woman now called the most powerful Speaker in one hundred years.”

Setting up the interview excerpts, Sawyer heralded how “she's said to have done it with an epic blend of persuasion, muscle,” describing Pelosi as the “indefatigable,, unwavering almost 70-year-old Speaker, mother of five, grandmother of seven.” After fretting about how “there was such vitriol around the Capitol and also inside the room last night,” Sawyer told Pelosi: “The Economist said that you are arguably the most powerful woman in American history. A Brown university professor has said you are certainly the most powerful Speaker in one hundred years.”

And, in a question best filed under “oh, now you get around to it,” Sawyer raised how Medicare costs far more than predicted:

As you know, there's great anxiety in the country about the potential cost of this bill. We went back and looked and in 1967, the projected cost by 1990 of Medicare was $12 billion. What really happened is it was $107 billion, which is more than eight times what they projected it would cost. What guarantee is there to the American people that this won't similarly balloon out of control?

Pelosi promised “we're addressing some of the ballooning controls of Medicare and taking those down.” Huh?

Last year, upon passage of a “stimulus” bill, CBS's Katie Couric giggled along with Pelosi, acting like a teenage girl gossiping about a friend's boyfriend in wondering about President Obama: “Can you tell us anything he said to you, like 'get cracking'?” NewsBusters post, with video.

Back in January of 2007 when Pelosi was sworn in as Speaker, then-ABC anchor Charles Gibson opened World News by trumpeting how, video of Speaker Nancy Pelosi on the House floor holding a baby while she talked to colleagues, demonstrated “the ultimate in multitasking: Taking care of the children and the country.” NewsBusters post. Video.

Sawyer, setting up the interview excerpt aired on the Monday, March 22 World News on ABC:

All agree she gets credit for locking up this vote, one of the biggest since Medicare in the 1960s. And she's said to have done it with an epic blend of persuasion, muscle and will even when half the town said it couldn't be done.

Last night, they cheered her in the chamber and lining up in front of her office. Their indefatigable,, unwavering almost 70-year-old Speaker, mother of five, grandmother of seven. She is powerful and polarizing. Republicans say they'll run against her in the November elections, but politics is in her DNA. Her father, a Congressman and Mayor of Baltimore, there in a wheelchair when she was sworn in to Congress. He did not live to see her become the first female Speaker. We talked to her in the room where the President called her last night to thank her.

Sawyer's “questions” to Pelosi:

- So this was the room where President Obama called you. The two of you talked in here last night. What did you say to each other?

- As you know, there was such vitriol around the Capitol and also inside the room last night. We heard people saying this is Nancy Pelosi's one party rule. [Boehner: “Shame on this body. Shame on each and every one of you.”] We heard the Minority Leader Boehner say shame on you. Shame on you. [Pelosi: “You know, some people will do anything for the insurance companies.”] You think that's the Minority Leader's motive? [Pelosi: “Yes, I do.”] His entire motive?

- As you know, there's great anxiety in the country about the potential cost of this bill. We went back and looked and in 1967, the projected cost by 1990 of Medicare was $12 billion. What really happened is it was $107 billion, which is more than eight times what they projected it would cost. What guarantee is there to the American people that this won't similarly balloon out of control?

- But they didn't think Medicare would balloon out of control and it did.

- When the Republicans say they can run against you in November and this will be their ticket to win?

- The Economist said that you are arguably the most powerful woman in American history. A Brown university professor has said you are certainly the most powerful Speaker in one hundred years. [Pelosi: “That sounds good. I don't take it personally, except I take it as a compliment for all women.”]

- [Showing Washington Post with “Democrats Claim Health Votes” headline] What do you think your dad and your mom would have said about this moment? [Pelosi: “Well, my brother called me. He was just so thrilled that what mommy and daddy would think about this. Of course, I believe they do know.”]

- Did your dad have a phrase, a sentence that meant the most to you when he'd say it to you, or your mom? [Pelosi: “Well, the only thing that comes to my mind right now is 'make sure you have the votes.'”]

- Not so sentimental!

Interview excerpts will run on Monday's Nightline and Tuesday's Good Morning America.

By NewsBusters.org
March 22, 2010
Leave a Comment

To ‘Indefatigable’ Pelosi, Sawyer Wonders What Her Dad and Mom ‘Would Have Said About this Moment?’

ABC anchor Diane Sawyer shared the glow of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's health policy victory, showing her, in an “ABC News exclusive” interview, a Washington Post with the headline of “Democrats Claim Health Votes” as she wondered: “What do you think your dad and your mom would have said about this moment?” Sawyer followed up: “Did your dad have a phrase, a sentence that meant the most to you when he'd say it to you, or your mom?” Pelosi's answer, “make sure you have the votes,” cracked up Sawyer, who chuckled: “No so sentimental.”

Sawyer framed her sit-down by trumpeting Pelosi's power, teasing at the top of World News: “Our exclusive interview with the woman now called the most powerful Speaker in one hundred years.”

Setting up the interview excerpts, Sawyer heralded how “she's said to have done it with an epic blend of persuasion, muscle,” describing Pelosi as the “indefatigable,, unwavering almost 70-year-old Speaker, mother of five, grandmother of seven.” After fretting about how “there was such vitriol around the Capitol and also inside the room last night,” Sawyer told Pelosi: “The Economist said that you are arguably the most powerful woman in American history. A Brown university professor has said you are certainly the most powerful Speaker in one hundred years.”

And, in a question best filed under “oh, now you get around to it,” Sawyer raised how Medicare costs far more than predicted:

As you know, there's great anxiety in the country about the potential cost of this bill. We went back and looked and in 1967, the projected cost by 1990 of Medicare was $12 billion. What really happened is it was $107 billion, which is more than eight times what they projected it would cost. What guarantee is there to the American people that this won't similarly balloon out of control?

Pelosi promised “we're addressing some of the ballooning controls of Medicare and taking those down.” Huh?

Last year, upon passage of a “stimulus” bill, CBS's Katie Couric giggled along with Pelosi, acting like a teenage girl gossiping about a friend's boyfriend in wondering about President Obama: “Can you tell us anything he said to you, like 'get cracking'?” NewsBusters post, with video.

Back in January of 2007 when Pelosi was sworn in as Speaker, then-ABC anchor Charles Gibson opened World News by trumpeting how, video of Speaker Nancy Pelosi on the House floor holding a baby while she talked to colleagues, demonstrated “the ultimate in multitasking: Taking care of the children and the country.” NewsBusters post. Video.

Sawyer, setting up the interview excerpt aired on the Monday, March 22 World News on ABC:

All agree she gets credit for locking up this vote, one of the biggest since Medicare in the 1960s. And she's said to have done it with an epic blend of persuasion, muscle and will even when half the town said it couldn't be done.

Last night, they cheered her in the chamber and lining up in front of her office. Their indefatigable,, unwavering almost 70-year-old Speaker, mother of five, grandmother of seven. She is powerful and polarizing. Republicans say they'll run against her in the November elections, but politics is in her DNA. Her father, a Congressman and Mayor of Baltimore, there in a wheelchair when she was sworn in to Congress. He did not live to see her become the first female Speaker. We talked to her in the room where the President called her last night to thank her.

Sawyer's “questions” to Pelosi:

- So this was the room where President Obama called you. The two of you talked in here last night. What did you say to each other?

- As you know, there was such vitriol around the Capitol and also inside the room last night. We heard people saying this is Nancy Pelosi's one party rule. [Boehner: “Shame on this body. Shame on each and every one of you.”] We heard the Minority Leader Boehner say shame on you. Shame on you. [Pelosi: “You know, some people will do anything for the insurance companies.”] You think that's the Minority Leader's motive? [Pelosi: “Yes, I do.”] His entire motive?

- As you know, there's great anxiety in the country about the potential cost of this bill. We went back and looked and in 1967, the projected cost by 1990 of Medicare was $12 billion. What really happened is it was $107 billion, which is more than eight times what they projected it would cost. What guarantee is there to the American people that this won't similarly balloon out of control?

- But they didn't think Medicare would balloon out of control and it did.

- When the Republicans say they can run against you in November and this will be their ticket to win?

- The Economist said that you are arguably the most powerful woman in American history. A Brown university professor has said you are certainly the most powerful Speaker in one hundred years. [Pelosi: “That sounds good. I don't take it personally, except I take it as a compliment for all women.”]

- [Showing Washington Post with “Democrats Claim Health Votes” headline] What do you think your dad and your mom would have said about this moment? [Pelosi: “Well, my brother called me. He was just so thrilled that what mommy and daddy would think about this. Of course, I believe they do know.”]

- Did your dad have a phrase, a sentence that meant the most to you when he'd say it to you, or your mom? [Pelosi: “Well, the only thing that comes to my mind right now is 'make sure you have the votes.'”]

- Not so sentimental!

Interview excerpts will run on Monday's Nightline and Tuesday's Good Morning America.

By NewsBusters.org
March 22, 2010
Leave a Comment

To ‘Indefatigable’ Pelosi, Sawyer Wonders What Her Dad and Mom ‘Would Have Said About this Moment?’

ABC anchor Diane Sawyer shared the glow of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's health policy victory, showing her, in an “ABC News exclusive” interview, a Washington Post with the headline of “Democrats Claim Health Votes” as she wondered: “What do you think your dad and your mom would have said about this moment?” Sawyer followed up: “Did your dad have a phrase, a sentence that meant the most to you when he'd say it to you, or your mom?” Pelosi's answer, “make sure you have the votes,” cracked up Sawyer, who chuckled: “No so sentimental.”

Sawyer framed her sit-down by trumpeting Pelosi's power, teasing at the top of World News: “Our exclusive interview with the woman now called the most powerful Speaker in one hundred years.”

Setting up the interview excerpts, Sawyer heralded how “she's said to have done it with an epic blend of persuasion, muscle,” describing Pelosi as the “indefatigable,, unwavering almost 70-year-old Speaker, mother of five, grandmother of seven.” After fretting about how “there was such vitriol around the Capitol and also inside the room last night,” Sawyer told Pelosi: “The Economist said that you are arguably the most powerful woman in American history. A Brown university professor has said you are certainly the most powerful Speaker in one hundred years.”

And, in a question best filed under “oh, now you get around to it,” Sawyer raised how Medicare costs far more than predicted:

As you know, there's great anxiety in the country about the potential cost of this bill. We went back and looked and in 1967, the projected cost by 1990 of Medicare was $12 billion. What really happened is it was $107 billion, which is more than eight times what they projected it would cost. What guarantee is there to the American people that this won't similarly balloon out of control?

Pelosi promised “we're addressing some of the ballooning controls of Medicare and taking those down.” Huh?

Last year, upon passage of a “stimulus” bill, CBS's Katie Couric giggled along with Pelosi, acting like a teenage girl gossiping about a friend's boyfriend in wondering about President Obama: “Can you tell us anything he said to you, like 'get cracking'?” NewsBusters post, with video.

Back in January of 2007 when Pelosi was sworn in as Speaker, then-ABC anchor Charles Gibson opened World News by trumpeting how, video of Speaker Nancy Pelosi on the House floor holding a baby while she talked to colleagues, demonstrated “the ultimate in multitasking: Taking care of the children and the country.” NewsBusters post. Video.

Sawyer, setting up the interview excerpt aired on the Monday, March 22 World News on ABC:

All agree she gets credit for locking up this vote, one of the biggest since Medicare in the 1960s. And she's said to have done it with an epic blend of persuasion, muscle and will even when half the town said it couldn't be done.

Last night, they cheered her in the chamber and lining up in front of her office. Their indefatigable,, unwavering almost 70-year-old Speaker, mother of five, grandmother of seven. She is powerful and polarizing. Republicans say they'll run against her in the November elections, but politics is in her DNA. Her father, a Congressman and Mayor of Baltimore, there in a wheelchair when she was sworn in to Congress. He did not live to see her become the first female Speaker. We talked to her in the room where the President called her last night to thank her.

Sawyer's “questions” to Pelosi:

- So this was the room where President Obama called you. The two of you talked in here last night. What did you say to each other?

- As you know, there was such vitriol around the Capitol and also inside the room last night. We heard people saying this is Nancy Pelosi's one party rule. [Boehner: “Shame on this body. Shame on each and every one of you.”] We heard the Minority Leader Boehner say shame on you. Shame on you. [Pelosi: “You know, some people will do anything for the insurance companies.”] You think that's the Minority Leader's motive? [Pelosi: “Yes, I do.”] His entire motive?

- As you know, there's great anxiety in the country about the potential cost of this bill. We went back and looked and in 1967, the projected cost by 1990 of Medicare was $12 billion. What really happened is it was $107 billion, which is more than eight times what they projected it would cost. What guarantee is there to the American people that this won't similarly balloon out of control?

- But they didn't think Medicare would balloon out of control and it did.

- When the Republicans say they can run against you in November and this will be their ticket to win?

- The Economist said that you are arguably the most powerful woman in American history. A Brown university professor has said you are certainly the most powerful Speaker in one hundred years. [Pelosi: “That sounds good. I don't take it personally, except I take it as a compliment for all women.”]

- [Showing Washington Post with “Democrats Claim Health Votes” headline] What do you think your dad and your mom would have said about this moment? [Pelosi: “Well, my brother called me. He was just so thrilled that what mommy and daddy would think about this. Of course, I believe they do know.”]

- Did your dad have a phrase, a sentence that meant the most to you when he'd say it to you, or your mom? [Pelosi: “Well, the only thing that comes to my mind right now is 'make sure you have the votes.'”]

- Not so sentimental!

Interview excerpts will run on Monday's Nightline and Tuesday's Good Morning America.

By NewsBusters.org
March 22, 2010
Leave a Comment

ABC’s Harris Focuses on Evangelical Christians as a Force for Good in Nonreligious Cambodia

Less than two weeks after linking draconian anti-gay sentiment in Uganda to a group of American evangelical Christians who visited the African nation, on Sunday’s World News, ABC correspondent Dan Harris filed a report focusing on the positive work of American evangelicals in Cambodia who are helping children escape from being sold into prostitution by their own parents. And, although he did not mention by name the existence of former communist leader Pol Pot’s Khmer Rouge regime, Harris recounted the theory of some Christians that the destruction of religion in the 1970s is one of several factors that helped erode morality in the country. Harris: "Why is this so easy here? Poverty is part of the answer, but some Christians say it's also because Cambodia endured a genocide in the 1970s, during which children were forced to spy on and even execute their parents, and the educated and religious communities were nearly wiped out. Pastor Don Brewster believes, as a result, Cambodia now suffers from a moral vacuum."

Diane Sawyer, anchoring on Sunday because of the impending House vote on ObamaCare, introduced the report: "It says in the Bible that faith without deeds is dead. And it's a notion taken to heart by a group of American evangelicals who are fighting child sex trafficking in Cambodia, a country that has been a magnet for pedophiles. Weekend anchor Dan Harris traveled to Cambodia to witness the rescue."

As the ABC correspondent introduced his report that recounted the efforts of American Christians to rescue Cambodian children, Harris highlighted one American Christian from California:

DAN HARRIS: This is the village of Sfi Pat, the epicenter of the child sex trade, where Clay Butler, a 27-year-old evangelical Christian from California, now runs a community center based out of a former brothel.

CLAY BUTLER: I think the most exciting part of Christianity is living it out. This stuff is not fun at all. But there is a deep fulfillment in laying your life down for somebody else.

Below is a complete transcript of the report from the Sunday, March 21, World News on ABC:

DIANE SAWYER: It says in the Bible that faith without deeds is dead. And it's a notion taken to heart by a group of American evangelicals who are fighting child sex trafficking in Cambodia, a country that has been a magnet for pedophiles. Weekend anchor Dan Harris traveled to Cambodia to witness the rescue.

DAN HARRIS: Look at these children and try to wrap your mind around the fact that on any given night, most of them will be sold for sex with strangers by their own parents. But, I mean, if we look at this group of kids right here-

CLAY BUTLER, EVANGELICAL CHRISTIAN: Yeah.

HARRIS: Some, some very, very, very, very high percentage of these kids have been trafficked at some point?

BUTLER: I know kids in that group that are being trafficked.

HARRIS: This is the village of Sfi Pat, the epicenter of the child sex trade, where Clay Butler, a 27-year-old evangelical Christian from California, now runs a community center based out of a former brothel.

BUTLER: I think the most exciting part of Christianity is living it out. This stuff is not fun at all. But there is a deep fulfillment in laying your life down for somebody else.

HARRIS: Other American Christians here in Cambodia are practicing an even more daring version of their faith. They go into the brothels to gather video evidence and then work with police to bust suspected sex tourists. They rescue child sex slaves like this girl named Bella. A few years ago, she was being sold for sex. Did they force you to have sex every day?

BELLA: Yeah.

HARRIS: Every day?

BELLA: Every day.

HARRIS: Bella was sold into slavery by her own mother. As we learned, it can be astonishingly easy to buy a child from his or her family here. We meet this 15-year-old girl selling water on the street, and in broad daylight, her mother says she's willing to make a deal. Can I get a sense of how much that would be? Are we talking $200 or $300 a month?

UNIDENTIFIED MAN TRANSLATING FOR UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: It's up to you.

HARRIS: Up to me. Has her daughter been with any men before me?

UNIDENTIFIED MAN TRANSLATING FOR UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: No, no, no, no, no. If you don’t trust, you can take her to the hospital.

HARRIS: If I don’t trust, I can take her to the hospital?

UNIDENTIFIED MAN: For a medical examination.

HARRIS: Why is this so easy here? Poverty is part of the answer, but some Christians say it’s also because Cambodia endured a genocide in the 1970s, during which children were forced to spy on and even execute their parents, and the educated and religious communities were nearly wiped out. Pastor Don Brewster believes, as a result, Cambodia now suffers from a moral vacuum.

DON BREWSTER, AGAPE INTERNATIONAL MISSIONS: These families will take a loan to buy a TV, which they know they can never pay. They can't feed themselves, let alone pay for a TV, but they know, "Hey, I’ve got my ace in the hole, I can sell my daughter."

HARRIS: Pastor Brewster runs a shelter here, where Bella now lives and is finally getting help.

BELLA: Because I can study and I can get love and I can have- (STARTS TO CRY)

HARRIS: Dan Harris, ABC News, Cambodia.

SAWYER: And Dan will have more reporting next week on all of this.

By NewsBusters.org
March 21, 2010
Leave a Comment

ABC’s Sawyer: ‘Protesters Roaming’ DC, ‘Increasingly Emotional, Yelling Slurs and Epithets’

As if anti-ObamaCare protesters are unruly street gangs, ABC’s Diane Sawyer, anchoring Sunday’s World News on what she touted as “a night for the history books” and a “seismic night,” impugned the opponents as a bunch of out of control marauders, citing “protesters roaming Washington, some of them increasingly emotional, yelling slurs and epithets.”

Elevating the same day-old despicable actions of a few on which ABC also focused on Saturday’s World News, ABC on Sunday devoted a full story to the topic. David Kerley reported that, “surrounded by angry protesters at the Capitol, someone yelled the N-word at” Congressman John Lewis” and “a few steps below, Representative Emanuel Cleaver was spat on,”while “as openly gay Representative Barney Frank walked the halls, a homophobic slur.”

Kerley began with the Democrats’ exploitation of the Lewis incident. Over video of Nancy Pelosi and Steny Hoyer walking side-by-side with Lewis as they joined hands, Kerley hailed “a remarkable scene, a remarkable statement. The Speaker and Democratic leader walking hand in hand to go vote today, with Representative John Lewis, who yesterday was reminded of old battles from his civil rights days.” Over black and white video, Kerley reminded viewers of how Lewis “was beaten by police as he led protesters across the Selma, Alabama, bridge” and so “it was hard to forget the history, as Lewis made that strikingly symbolic walk today.”

After reciting the benefits of the legislation, Sawyer turned to Dr. Tim Johnson, a long-time advocate of nationalization well to the left of what the House was about to pass. He cited “experts” who say “it's no accident that every other developed country in the world has universal coverage, and every other developed country in the world has lower per capita health care costs than we do.”

Sawyer asked: “In six months, an insurance company cannot drop you if you get sick. How big is that?” Johnson insisted: “That's huge because, both financially and medically, that provision can quite literally kill people.”

Sunday morning: “CBS: ‘Mean from the Start’ Health Debate ‘Turned Even Nastier Yesterday’ with ‘Racial Epithets’ and ‘Sexual Slurs’”

Saturday night: “ABC: Anti-ObamaCare Protest ‘Turned Very Ugly’ with ‘Racial and Homophobic Slurs’”

The coverage on the Sunday, March 21 World News on ABC, transcripts provided by the MRC’s Brad Wilmouth:

DIANE SAWYER: Opponents of the bill have been out today, and some of them pulled out all the stops. Protesters roaming Washington, some of them increasingly emotional, yelling slurs and epithets. David Kerley tracked them.

DAVID KERLEY: A remarkable scene, a remarkable statement. The Speaker and Democratic leader walking hand in hand to go vote today, with Representative John Lewis, who yesterday was reminded of old battles from his civil rights days.

CLIP OF PROTESTERS: Kill the bill! Kill the bill!

KERLEY: Surrounded by angry protesters at the Capitol, someone yelled the N-word at Lewis. And a few steps below, Representative Emanuel Cleaver was spat on. Watch as Cleaver berates the protesters, saying, "You spit on me, you spit on me." Cleaver declined to press charges. And inside, as openly gay Representative Barney Frank walked the halls, a homophobic slur.

VOICE HEARD AMONG PROTESTERS: Barney Frank is a-

REP. BARNEY FRANK (D-MA): I think the Republicans are making a great mistake in thinking that they can benefit politically from these kind of thug tactics.

KERLEY: Actually, Republicans today were trying to distance themselves.

MICHAEL STEELE, RNC CHAIRMAN, ON NBC'S MEET THE PRESS: This is certainly not a reflection of the movement or the Republican party when you have some idiots out there saying very stupid things.

KERLEY: Several protesters refused to believe the incidents even took place. Others say they should not taint their movement.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE PROTESTER: That actually takes away from what we're trying to do here. I don't condone it.

REVEREND LEONARD N. SMITH, MOUNT ZION BAPTIST CHURCH: They may call you the N-word again, but stand up for what's right!

KERLEY: John Lewis was among those in church this morning, with thoughts of 1965, when he was beaten by police as he led protesters across the Selma, Alabama, bridge. And thoughts of yesterday, walking the steps on Capitol Hill.

REP. JOHN LEWIS (D-GA): Well, it reminded me of another period in our history. I don't want to make much of it. I want to keep the emphasis on what we must do today.

KERLEY: But it was hard to forget the history, as Lewis made that strikingly symbolic walk today. Lewis is in the House behind me right now with the other members debating the health care reform bill, and all those protesters have been moved. They swarmed these steps last night, but they've all been moved south of the House, where the House members may still be able to hear them. Nobody was arrested yesterday with all those incidents, Diane, but today, two of the health care reform protesters were arrested.

SAWYER; All right, David, and thank you.

....

DIANE SAWYER: And we think no one knows more about American health care and health care around the world than our senior medial editor, Dr. Tim Johnson, who is joining us on this big night. Tim, the biggest change you see for health in America, as a physician?

TIM JOHNSON: Well, as a physician, it has to be the fact that some 30 million Americans will now get insurance who don't have it. That's a key item medically because people with insurance tend to go in earlier for preventive care, they tend to go in earlier when they have symptoms, when diseases can be treated more cheaply and more effectively. We take care of these people without insurance now, but we do it at a later stage when it tends to cost more. So many experts think that this will also make a big difference financially in helping down the line to control costs. People will go in, have things taken care of in a preventive fashion, or earlier.

They say – these experts – it's no accident that every other developed country in the world has universal coverage, and every other developed country in the world has lower per capita health care costs than we do. They think there's a connection between having insurance and controlling costs.

SAWYER: And a quick question about those who do have insurance now. That provision we just mentioned: In six months, an insurance company cannot drop you if you get sick. How big is that?

JOHNSON: That's huge because, both financially and medically, that provision can quite literally kill people. It costs them a fortune for serious chronic disease, and it often leads to premature death because they don't get necessary treatment. So I think that's a huge factor.

SAWYER: All right, Dr. Timothy Johnson, great to talk to you tonight.

By NewsBusters.org
March 17, 2010
Leave a Comment

Competitors See FNC’s Baier as ‘Contentious’ with Obama While ABC Devotes Full Story to Obama’s NCAA Picks

CBS and NBC, which have delivered very friendly interviews with President Barack Obama (link below the jump to examples), on Wednesday night characterized Bret Baier's sit-down with Obama for the Fox News Channel as “contentious,” while ABC decided to devote nearly two minutes of World News (1:50) to Obama's college basketball tournament choices.

Anchor Diane Sawyer teased at the start of the March 17 newscast, “Top picks: Stream of consciousness as the Fan-in-Chief completes his college basketball bracket.”

On the NBC Nightly News, Kelly O'Donnell referred to the “contentious interview with Fox News.” Chip Reid, on the CBS Evening News, added a modifier as he saw “a very contentious interview.”

The ABC story on Obama's basketball picks consisted of highlights from corporate cousin ESPN's session with Obama as he filled out a big bracket chart, and World News included Obama's spelling challenge. “Should be an R in there,” ESPN's Andy Katz corrected Obama upon spotting how the President had misspelled “Syracuse” as “Sycacuse.”

(Click on screen shot for a larger jpg image of Obama's misspelling.)

For five examples from last year of CBS and NBC journalists working to advance Obama's cause, check out the “Let Us Fluff Your Pillow Award for Obsequious Obama Interviews” in the MRC's “Best Notable Quotables of 2009: The 22nd Annual Awards for the Year's Worst Reporting.”

—Brent Baker is Vice President for Research and Publications at the Media Research Center. Click here to follow him on Twitter.

 

By NewsBusters.org
March 15, 2010
Leave a Comment

ABC Links American Christians to Anti-Gay Death Penalty in Uganda, Ignores Rick Warren’s Condemnation

On ABC last Wednesday, both World News and Nightline featured a report filed by correspondent Dan Harris in which he linked the activities of some American evangelical Christian pastors with anti-gay hatred and attempts by Uganda’s parliament at passing death penalty legislation to punish homosexuals in the African nation. Each of the reports focused on the extreme views of American pastor Scott Lively and Ugandan pastor Martin Ssempa, without including the views of more mainstream American evangelical leaders.

On World News, anchor Diane Sawyer teased: "Gay terror: Have some American evangelical ministers helped threaten the lives of homosexuals in Africa?" She later plugged the report again: "And still ahead on World News, a death threat for gays. It happened after American evangelicals delivered a potent message."

In the version of the report that ran on Nightline, Harris made a point of mentioning Pastor Rick Warren as being a "one-time friend" of Pastor  Ssempa. And, though Harris’s reference to Pastor Warren as a "one-time friend" perhaps implies a falling out between the two men, the ABC correspondent could have more directly informed viewers that Pastor Warren released a statement last October declaring that he had not associated with Pastor Ssempa since 2007.

Furthermore, last December, Pastor Warren released a video message for Christians in Uganda in which he attacked the proposed anti-gay law as legislation "I completely oppose and I vigorously condemn," as he went on to declare, "The potential law before your parliament is unjust, it’s extreme, and it’s un-Christian toward homosexuals, requiring death penalty even in some cases."

As Harris featured clips of one of the American evangelical pastors – who pushes the bizarre theory that Adolf Hitler and other German Nazi leaders were homosexuals – in the World News version of the story Harris made no distinction between this pastor’s views on homosexuals and other evangelical Christians who are more mainstream, while in the Nightline version of the story Harris only briefly alluded to him being extreme compared to other evangelicals as the ABC correspondent recounted to viewers that "At home, these views may be marginalized or even mocked."

And, while the World News version of the report dates the conference that included American evangelical speakers as having taken place "last March," the Nightline version of the report did not specify the date, thus giving a greater impression that some of the hysterical anti-gay protesters shown might have been stirred up immediately after a more recent presence of the American pastors. Substitute host Martin Bashir introduced the report by informing viewers that "a group of American evangelicals traveled to a far away land – a place where homosexuality is already a crime – to speak out against it," adding that "Since that seminar, anti-gay fervor has continued to ferment. Now, if a controversial bill passes, your homosexuality may cost you your life."

Harris left the impression that the anti-gay protests and anger shown were part of an immediate "aftermath" of the conference:

DAN HARRIS: We went to Uganda to investigate what has happened in the aftermath of that conference. This:

UNIDENTIFIED MALE PROTESTER SHOUTING: Homosexuality has been prohibited here in Uganda! We don't want it!

HARRIS: An extraordinary wave of homophobia, which even includes a bill that would put some gays and lesbians to death.

Harris then linked the featured anti-gay Ugandan Pastor Ssempa to Pastor Warren, and even left the impression that the American pastors who took part in the March 2009 seminar had actually helped co-host the conference rather than just appearing as featured speakers as he recounted that Pastor Ssempa "helped host" the conference "with" the American pastors. Harris: "The bill is supported by one of the country's most popular pastors, Martin Ssempa, who helped host that conference with the American evangelicals, and is a one-time friend of the American megachurch pastor Rick Warren."

After clips of Pastor Ssempa were shown in which he expressed his anti-gay views, the ABC correspondent relayed that American Christians have been blamed for some of the events in Uganda. Harris: "Critics say this extreme anti-gay fervor is in part the result of a concerted campaign by American Christians to export our culture wars to Africa, a campaign that reached a crescendo at that conference we told you about."

While Harris eventually informed viewers that the three American pastors who took part in the conference last year had voiced their opposition to the proposed law, the ABC correspondent never gave other more mainstream American evangelical leaders the chance to weigh in on whether they would dissent from some of the extreme rhetoric allegedly featured at the seminar event of March 2009.

The World News version of the report did not mention Pastor Warren, showed an abridged account of the extreme views of the pastors featured, and informed the audience that the American pastors at the conference had voiced opposition to the death penalty proposal in Uganda, but also did not include the views of mainstream American evangelical Christians at all. Harris concluded the report: "In the meantime, gay Ugandans, including those whose anguished faces we see, and those we cannot, say they cannot believe American Christians traveled all this way here to make their already harrowing existence so much more terrifying. Dan Harris, ABC News, Kampala, Uganda."

Below are complete transcripts of the relevant reports from the Wednesday March 10, Nightline and the same day’s World News on ABC:

#From the March 10 Nightline:

MARTIN BASHIR: A group of American evangelicals traveled to a far away land – a place where homosexuality is already a crime – to speak out against it. Since that seminar, anti-gay fervor has continued to ferment. Now, if a controversial bill passes, your homosexuality may cost you your life, as Dan Harris reports for our series "Faith Matters."

PASTOR SCOTT LIVELY: The gay movement is an evil institution that's goal, the goal of the gay movement is to defeat the marriage-based society.

DAN HARRIS: This is the American evangelical Scott Lively speaking at an event called the "Seminar on Exposing the Homosexual Agenda," half a world away in the African country of Uganda.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE PROTESTER IN UGANDA: We say no to homosexuals, we don't allow homosexuals!

HARRIS: We went to Uganda to investigate what has happened in the aftermath of that conference. This:

UNIDENTIFIED MALE PROTESTER IN UGANDA: Homosexuality has been prohibited here in Uganda! We don't want it!

HARRIS: An extraordinary wave of homophobia, which even includes a bill that would put some gays and lesbians to death. The bill is supported by one of the country's most popular pastors, Martin Ssempa, who helped host that conference with the American evangelicals-

PASTOR MARTIN SSEMPA, MAKERERE COMMUNITY CHURCH: Africa is united against sodomy!

HARRIS: -and is a one-time friend of the American mega church pastor Rick Warren.

SSEMPA: I'm going to give evidence on what homosexuals do.

HARRIS: We found Ssempa whipping up support for the bill by showing his followers extraordinarily graphic gay pornography.

SSEMPA: This is the-

(AUDIENCE EXPESSES NEGATIVE REACTION TO SLIDE SHOW)

SSEMPA: In Africa, sodomy is an abomination and taboo and an evil!

HARRIS: Does all this fit in your mind with the spirit of Christianity, which is to help the oppressed?

SSEMPA: Very much. Very, very much. We need to know what are they doing in their bedroom? And you cannot make comments out of ignorance. The problem is, the absence of shock. You know, you look at the same thing – Dan, you're not shocked.

HARRIS: You could play porn between men and women and shock people, too, but it's not done very frequently.

SSEMPA CLIP #1: Sir, anal activity, anything having to do with eating of poop, heterosexuals do not eat poop.

SSEMPA CLIP #2: In same way, if you have sex with a dog, sex with a cow, that's evil.

SSEMPA, IN FRONT OF AUDIENCE: They start off by touching each other's genitals and smelling each other.

HARRIS: Critics say this extreme anti-gay fervor is in part the result of a concerted campaign by American Christians to export our culture wars to Africa, a campaign that reached a crescendo at that conference we told you about.

LIVELY: Even though probably the majority of homosexuals are not oriented toward young people, there’s a significant number of them are.

LIVELY CLIP #2: And that they, when they see a child that's from a broken home, it's like they have a flashing neon sign over their head.

HARRIS: The star attractions at the event? Three American Christians, including Scott Lively.

LIVELY: I'm not going to sit back and let them attempt to overthrow Christian civilization. That's really what it comes down to.

HARRIS: Lively is the author of a book called "The Pink Swastika," in which he argues that Nazism was actually a gay movement.

LIVELY: A large number of Hitler's inner circle were homosexual and Hitler himself was a homosexual.

HARRIS: The vast majority of Holocaust scholars would violently disagree with you.

LIVELY: Oh, I don't think so. I don't think that-

HARRIS: That the Nazi movement was largely a homosexual movement.

LIVELY: Well, the book, it's 400 pages of documentation.

HARRIS: At home, these views may be marginalized or even mocked, but the hundreds of Ugandan teachers, cops and politicians at the conference took them quite seriously. Months later, a bill was introduced called the "Anti-Homosexuality Bill of 2009," which calls for death by hanging for gay and lesbian serial offenders, and also prison time for anyone, including parents, who fail to hand over someone they know is gay or lesbian to the police.

HARRIS: This bill says if you get married while gay or lesbian to another gay or lesbian, you're going to prison for the rest of your life. Do you agree with that?

SSEMPA: I agree with that in my country.

HARRIS: You do?

SSEMPA: In my country.

HARRIS: You think that's a fair punishment? Life in prison to get married?

SSEMPA: Sir, I think that what we do not understand here is, A, in Africa, sodomy is an abomination. It's an abomination to our culture, to our God, and when you do bring sodomy, you practice sodomy, you bring a curse on the nation.

HARRIS: There's a common theory that the people who have the biggest problems with gays and lesbians have themselves struggled with homosexual urges.

SSEMPA: No, no, no, no, no, no, no.

HARRIS: Have you ever?

SSEMPA: That means everybody who fights terrorism is themselves a terrorist. (LAUGHS)

HARRIS: Are you comparing homosexuality to terrorism?

SSEMPA: It is sexual terrorism.

HARRIS: Do you ever worry that you're whipping up hatred in a way that could end up being violent?

SSEMPA: I don't worry about whipping up hatred. Actually, what I worry is that people, like you, who seem to hear what I'm saying, but they don't seem to understand. I worry that networks of televisions are controlled by homosexuals.

UNIDENTIFIED MAN ON STAGE: No to sodomy.

CLIP OF AUDIENCE: No to sodomy!

HARRIS: Even though backers of the bill now insist they only want to execute homosexual pedophiles, governments all over the world are up in arms. President Obama denounced the bill as odious, and the American evangelicals who spoke at that event in Uganda are now rushing to distance themselves from the bill. They claim they had no idea it was coming and deny any responsibility for it. You said before that you had no idea that your time in Uganda would be followed by such a draconian tough law. But you did say on your Web site, I believe, either you said or you quoted somebody as saying-

LIVELY: A nuclear bomb.

HARRIS: Yes, that it was like a nuclear bomb.

LIVELY: Well, and it was, and I'm proud of that. And I hope the nuclear bomb spreads across the whole world against the gay movement, against this attempt to overthrow family-based society and replace it with sexual anarchy. That doesn't mean I hate homosexuals. It doesn't mean that I want anybody to be thrown in jail.

HARRIS: But Uganda is a country where local newspapers out purported "homos" and where those who dare to come out of the closet are so scared they have to hold news conferences wearing masks. Did you ever think at any point that perhaps, given the history of this country, that you might be saying things that would have an unpleasant outcome?

LIVELY: Do you think that these people did not already have an opinion against homosexuality, a strong opinion? It's incredibly racist. It's the colonial mindset all over again.

HARRIS: An argument echoed by the main proponents of the bill in Uganda.

SSEMPA: It's offensive to me. It's offensive to me that every time a black man does something good, you have to say that a white man told us to do it. That's really offensive to me.

HARRIS: But the outrage in the West may mean that the bill gets either watered down or killed. The Ugandan parliament will be holding hearings on it later this month. As for Scott Lively, he says if they drop the death penalty, he will actually endorse the bill.

LIVELY: These are good Christians, better Christians in Uganda than there are here in this country. They care about each other. And the reason that this law is in place, the reason that they, I think that they're pushing so hard on this is that they don't want to see happen to their country what's happened over here.

HARRIS: For Nightline this is Dan Harris in Kampala, Uganda.

BASHIR: One extreme in this ongoing and sensitive debate. Our thanks to Dan Harris.

#From the March 10 World News :

DIANE SAWYER, IN OPENING TEASER: Gay terror: Have some American evangelical ministers helped threaten the lives of homosexuals in Africa?

...

SAWYER, BEFORE COMMERCIAL BREAK: And still ahead on World News, a death threat for gays. It happened after American evangelicals delivered a potent message.

...

SAWYER: And now we dig more deeply into a flashpoint issue. We heard that some evangelical Christians from this country traveled to Uganda to preach an anti-gay message there. And now, gays in that country are looking at the possibility of a law that could invoke the death penalty. Is there a connection? Dan Harris traveled to Uganda.

DAN HARRIS: To be gay in Uganda already meant living in constant fear. It's a place where newspapers out purported "homos," and gay activists are forced to hold news conferences wearing masks. Then into this tinderbox walked American evangelical Scott Lively.

PASTOR SCOTT LIVELY: The gay movement is an evil institution that's goal, the goal of the gay movement is to defeat the marriage-based society.

DAN HARRIS: Lively is one of several American Christians who spoke last March at a three-day event called the "Seminar on Exposing the Homosexual Agenda," warning Ugandans that gays target their children.

LIVELY: When they see a child that's from a broken home, it's like they have a flashing neon sign over their head.

HARRIS: We went to Uganda to investigate what has happened in the aftermath, an extraordinary wave of homophobia.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE PROTESTER IN UGANDA: Homosexuality, here in Uganda, we don't want it!

HARRIS: The Ugandan parliament is now considering an anti-homosexuality bill, which calls for death by hanging for some gays and lesbians and prison for anyone, including parents, who doesn't hand gays over to police.

PASTOR MARTIN SSEMPA: In Africa, sodomy is an abomination!

HARRIS: We found one of the bill's main backers, the American-educated Pastor Martin Ssempa, whipping up support by showing gay pornography. Does all this fit in your mind with the spirit of Christianity, which is to help the oppressed?

SSEMPA: Very much. Very, very much. We need to know what are they doing in their bedroom?

HARRIS: You could play porn between men and women and shock people, too.

HARRIS: His response to that is so graphic, we won't broadcast it here. A few gay Ugandans were brave enough to go on camera to tell us that the American Christians have made their lives much more dangerous.

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE UGANDAN: Sometimes I come back home and just sob, I cry.

HARRIS: Even though Scott Lively and at least one of his fellow American Christians met with members of the Ugandan parliament while they were here last year, they now say they had nothing to do with, and do not support, the bill that would put gays to death. You said before that you had no idea that your time in Uganda would be followed by such a draconian, tough law, but you did say on your Web site, I believe, either you said or you quoted somebody saying-

LIVELY: A nuclear bomb.

HARRIS: Yes, that it was like a nuclear bomb.

LIVELY: And it was, and I'm proud of that, and I hope the nuclear bomb spreads across the whole world against the gay movement, against this attempt to overthrow family-based society and replace it with sexual anarchy. That doesn't mean I hate homosexuals. That doesn't mean that I want anybody to be thrown in jail.

HARRIS: He says it's racist to think a handful of Americans could convince so many Ugandans to consider such a tough bill. Martin Ssempa agrees.

SSEMPA: It's offensive to me. It's offensive to me that every time a black man does something good, you have to say that a white man told us to do it.

HARRIS: There's a common theory that the people who have the biggest problems with gays and lesbians have themselves struggled with homosexual urges.

SSEMPA: No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no.

HARRIS: Have you ever?

SSEMPA: That means everybody who fights terrorism is themselves a terrorist. (LAUGHS)

HARRIS: Are you comparing homosexuality to terrorism?

SSEMPA: It is sexual terrorism.

HARRIS: In the meantime, gay Ugandans, including those whose anguished faces we see, and those we cannot, say they cannot believe American Christians traveled all this way here to make their already harrowing existence so much more terrifying. Dan Harris, ABC News, Kampala, Uganda.

By NewsBusters.org
March 15, 2010
Leave a Comment

ABC Links American Christians to Anti-Gay Death Penalty in Uganda, Ignores Rick Warren’s Condemnation

On ABC last Wednesday, both World News and Nightline featured a report filed by correspondent Dan Harris in which he linked the activities of some American evangelical Christian pastors with anti-gay hatred and attempts by Uganda’s parliament at passing death penalty legislation to punish homosexuals in the African nation. Each of the reports focused on the extreme views of American pastor Scott Lively and Ugandan pastor Martin Ssempa, without including the views of more mainstream American evangelical leaders.

On World News, anchor Diane Sawyer teased: "Gay terror: Have some American evangelical ministers helped threaten the lives of homosexuals in Africa?" She later plugged the report again: "And still ahead on World News, a death threat for gays. It happened after American evangelicals delivered a potent message."

In the version of the report that ran on Nightline, Harris made a point of mentioning Pastor Rick Warren as being a "one-time friend" of Pastor  Ssempa. And, though Harris’s reference to Pastor Warren as a "one-time friend" perhaps implies a falling out between the two men, the ABC correspondent could have more directly informed viewers that Pastor Warren released a statement last October declaring that he had not associated with Pastor Ssempa since 2007.

Furthermore, last December, Pastor Warren released a video message for Christians in Uganda in which he attacked the proposed anti-gay law as legislation "I completely oppose and I vigorously condemn," as he went on to declare, "The potential law before your parliament is unjust, it’s extreme, and it’s un-Christian toward homosexuals, requiring death penalty even in some cases."

As Harris featured clips of one of the American evangelical pastors – who pushes the bizarre theory that Adolf Hitler and other German Nazi leaders were homosexuals – in the World News version of the story Harris made no distinction between this pastor’s views on homosexuals and other evangelical Christians who are more mainstream, while in the Nightline version of the story Harris only briefly alluded to him being extreme compared to other evangelicals as the ABC correspondent recounted to viewers that "At home, these views may be marginalized or even mocked."

And, while the World News version of the report dates the conference that included American evangelical speakers as having taken place "last March," the Nightline version of the report did not specify the date, thus giving a greater impression that some of the hysterical anti-gay protesters shown might have been stirred up immediately after a more recent presence of the American pastors. Substitute host Martin Bashir introduced the report by informing viewers that "a group of American evangelicals traveled to a far away land – a place where homosexuality is already a crime – to speak out against it," adding that "Since that seminar, anti-gay fervor has continued to ferment. Now, if a controversial bill passes, your homosexuality may cost you your life."

Harris left the impression that the anti-gay protests and anger shown were part of an immediate "aftermath" of the conference:

DAN HARRIS: We went to Uganda to investigate what has happened in the aftermath of that conference. This:

UNIDENTIFIED MALE PROTESTER SHOUTING: Homosexuality has been prohibited here in Uganda! We don't want it!

HARRIS: An extraordinary wave of homophobia, which even includes a bill that would put some gays and lesbians to death.

Harris then linked the featured anti-gay Ugandan Pastor Ssempa to Pastor Warren, and even left the impression that the American pastors who took part in the March 2009 seminar had actually helped co-host the conference rather than just appearing as featured speakers as he recounted that Pastor Ssempa "helped host" the conference "with" the American pastors. Harris: "The bill is supported by one of the country's most popular pastors, Martin Ssempa, who helped host that conference with the American evangelicals, and is a one-time friend of the American megachurch pastor Rick Warren."

After clips of Pastor Ssempa were shown in which he expressed his anti-gay views, the ABC correspondent relayed that American Christians have been blamed for some of the events in Uganda. Harris: "Critics say this extreme anti-gay fervor is in part the result of a concerted campaign by American Christians to export our culture wars to Africa, a campaign that reached a crescendo at that conference we told you about."

While Harris eventually informed viewers that the three American pastors who took part in the conference last year had voiced their opposition to the proposed law, the ABC correspondent never gave other more mainstream American evangelical leaders the chance to weigh in on whether they would dissent from some of the extreme rhetoric allegedly featured at the seminar event of March 2009.

The World News version of the report did not mention Pastor Warren, showed an abridged account of the extreme views of the pastors featured, and informed the audience that the American pastors at the conference had voiced opposition to the death penalty proposal in Uganda, but also did not include the views of mainstream American evangelical Christians at all. Harris concluded the report: "In the meantime, gay Ugandans, including those whose anguished faces we see, and those we cannot, say they cannot believe American Christians traveled all this way here to make their already harrowing existence so much more terrifying. Dan Harris, ABC News, Kampala, Uganda."

Below are complete transcripts of the relevant reports from the Wednesday March 10, Nightline and the same day’s World News on ABC:

#From the March 10 Nightline:

MARTIN BASHIR: A group of American evangelicals traveled to a far away land – a place where homosexuality is already a crime – to speak out against it. Since that seminar, anti-gay fervor has continued to ferment. Now, if a controversial bill passes, your homosexuality may cost you your life, as Dan Harris reports for our series "Faith Matters."

PASTOR SCOTT LIVELY: The gay movement is an evil institution that's goal, the goal of the gay movement is to defeat the marriage-based society.

DAN HARRIS: This is the American evangelical Scott Lively speaking at an event called the "Seminar on Exposing the Homosexual Agenda," half a world away in the African country of Uganda.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE PROTESTER IN UGANDA: We say no to homosexuals, we don't allow homosexuals!

HARRIS: We went to Uganda to investigate what has happened in the aftermath of that conference. This:

UNIDENTIFIED MALE PROTESTER IN UGANDA: Homosexuality has been prohibited here in Uganda! We don't want it!

HARRIS: An extraordinary wave of homophobia, which even includes a bill that would put some gays and lesbians to death. The bill is supported by one of the country's most popular pastors, Martin Ssempa, who helped host that conference with the American evangelicals-

PASTOR MARTIN SSEMPA, MAKERERE COMMUNITY CHURCH: Africa is united against sodomy!

HARRIS: -and is a one-time friend of the American mega church pastor Rick Warren.

SSEMPA: I'm going to give evidence on what homosexuals do.

HARRIS: We found Ssempa whipping up support for the bill by showing his followers extraordinarily graphic gay pornography.

SSEMPA: This is the-

(AUDIENCE EXPESSES NEGATIVE REACTION TO SLIDE SHOW)

SSEMPA: In Africa, sodomy is an abomination and taboo and an evil!

HARRIS: Does all this fit in your mind with the spirit of Christianity, which is to help the oppressed?

SSEMPA: Very much. Very, very much. We need to know what are they doing in their bedroom? And you cannot make comments out of ignorance. The problem is, the absence of shock. You know, you look at the same thing – Dan, you're not shocked.

HARRIS: You could play porn between men and women and shock people, too, but it's not done very frequently.

SSEMPA CLIP #1: Sir, anal activity, anything having to do with eating of poop, heterosexuals do not eat poop.

SSEMPA CLIP #2: In same way, if you have sex with a dog, sex with a cow, that's evil.

SSEMPA, IN FRONT OF AUDIENCE: They start off by touching each other's genitals and smelling each other.

HARRIS: Critics say this extreme anti-gay fervor is in part the result of a concerted campaign by American Christians to export our culture wars to Africa, a campaign that reached a crescendo at that conference we told you about.

LIVELY: Even though probably the majority of homosexuals are not oriented toward young people, there’s a significant number of them are.

LIVELY CLIP #2: And that they, when they see a child that's from a broken home, it's like they have a flashing neon sign over their head.

HARRIS: The star attractions at the event? Three American Christians, including Scott Lively.

LIVELY: I'm not going to sit back and let them attempt to overthrow Christian civilization. That's really what it comes down to.

HARRIS: Lively is the author of a book called "The Pink Swastika," in which he argues that Nazism was actually a gay movement.

LIVELY: A large number of Hitler's inner circle were homosexual and Hitler himself was a homosexual.

HARRIS: The vast majority of Holocaust scholars would violently disagree with you.

LIVELY: Oh, I don't think so. I don't think that-

HARRIS: That the Nazi movement was largely a homosexual movement.

LIVELY: Well, the book, it's 400 pages of documentation.

HARRIS: At home, these views may be marginalized or even mocked, but the hundreds of Ugandan teachers, cops and politicians at the conference took them quite seriously. Months later, a bill was introduced called the "Anti-Homosexuality Bill of 2009," which calls for death by hanging for gay and lesbian serial offenders, and also prison time for anyone, including parents, who fail to hand over someone they know is gay or lesbian to the police.

HARRIS: This bill says if you get married while gay or lesbian to another gay or lesbian, you're going to prison for the rest of your life. Do you agree with that?

SSEMPA: I agree with that in my country.

HARRIS: You do?

SSEMPA: In my country.

HARRIS: You think that's a fair punishment? Life in prison to get married?

SSEMPA: Sir, I think that what we do not understand here is, A, in Africa, sodomy is an abomination. It's an abomination to our culture, to our God, and when you do bring sodomy, you practice sodomy, you bring a curse on the nation.

HARRIS: There's a common theory that the people who have the biggest problems with gays and lesbians have themselves struggled with homosexual urges.

SSEMPA: No, no, no, no, no, no, no.

HARRIS: Have you ever?

SSEMPA: That means everybody who fights terrorism is themselves a terrorist. (LAUGHS)

HARRIS: Are you comparing homosexuality to terrorism?

SSEMPA: It is sexual terrorism.

HARRIS: Do you ever worry that you're whipping up hatred in a way that could end up being violent?

SSEMPA: I don't worry about whipping up hatred. Actually, what I worry is that people, like you, who seem to hear what I'm saying, but they don't seem to understand. I worry that networks of televisions are controlled by homosexuals.

UNIDENTIFIED MAN ON STAGE: No to sodomy.

CLIP OF AUDIENCE: No to sodomy!

HARRIS: Even though backers of the bill now insist they only want to execute homosexual pedophiles, governments all over the world are up in arms. President Obama denounced the bill as odious, and the American evangelicals who spoke at that event in Uganda are now rushing to distance themselves from the bill. They claim they had no idea it was coming and deny any responsibility for it. You said before that you had no idea that your time in Uganda would be followed by such a draconian tough law. But you did say on your Web site, I believe, either you said or you quoted somebody as saying-

LIVELY: A nuclear bomb.

HARRIS: Yes, that it was like a nuclear bomb.

LIVELY: Well, and it was, and I'm proud of that. And I hope the nuclear bomb spreads across the whole world against the gay movement, against this attempt to overthrow family-based society and replace it with sexual anarchy. That doesn't mean I hate homosexuals. It doesn't mean that I want anybody to be thrown in jail.

HARRIS: But Uganda is a country where local newspapers out purported "homos" and where those who dare to come out of the closet are so scared they have to hold news conferences wearing masks. Did you ever think at any point that perhaps, given the history of this country, that you might be saying things that would have an unpleasant outcome?

LIVELY: Do you think that these people did not already have an opinion against homosexuality, a strong opinion? It's incredibly racist. It's the colonial mindset all over again.

HARRIS: An argument echoed by the main proponents of the bill in Uganda.

SSEMPA: It's offensive to me. It's offensive to me that every time a black man does something good, you have to say that a white man told us to do it. That's really offensive to me.

HARRIS: But the outrage in the West may mean that the bill gets either watered down or killed. The Ugandan parliament will be holding hearings on it later this month. As for Scott Lively, he says if they drop the death penalty, he will actually endorse the bill.

LIVELY: These are good Christians, better Christians in Uganda than there are here in this country. They care about each other. And the reason that this law is in place, the reason that they, I think that they're pushing so hard on this is that they don't want to see happen to their country what's happened over here.

HARRIS: For Nightline this is Dan Harris in Kampala, Uganda.

BASHIR: One extreme in this ongoing and sensitive debate. Our thanks to Dan Harris.

#From the March 10 World News :

DIANE SAWYER, IN OPENING TEASER: Gay terror: Have some American evangelical ministers helped threaten the lives of homosexuals in Africa?

...

SAWYER, BEFORE COMMERCIAL BREAK: And still ahead on World News, a death threat for gays. It happened after American evangelicals delivered a potent message.

...

SAWYER: And now we dig more deeply into a flashpoint issue. We heard that some evangelical Christians from this country traveled to Uganda to preach an anti-gay message there. And now, gays in that country are looking at the possibility of a law that could invoke the death penalty. Is there a connection? Dan Harris traveled to Uganda.

DAN HARRIS: To be gay in Uganda already meant living in constant fear. It's a place where newspapers out purported "homos," and gay activists are forced to hold news conferences wearing masks. Then into this tinderbox walked American evangelical Scott Lively.

PASTOR SCOTT LIVELY: The gay movement is an evil institution that's goal, the goal of the gay movement is to defeat the marriage-based society.

DAN HARRIS: Lively is one of several American Christians who spoke last March at a three-day event called the "Seminar on Exposing the Homosexual Agenda," warning Ugandans that gays target their children.

LIVELY: When they see a child that's from a broken home, it's like they have a flashing neon sign over their head.

HARRIS: We went to Uganda to investigate what has happened in the aftermath, an extraordinary wave of homophobia.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE PROTESTER IN UGANDA: Homosexuality, here in Uganda, we don't want it!

HARRIS: The Ugandan parliament is now considering an anti-homosexuality bill, which calls for death by hanging for some gays and lesbians and prison for anyone, including parents, who doesn't hand gays over to police.

PASTOR MARTIN SSEMPA: In Africa, sodomy is an abomination!

HARRIS: We found one of the bill's main backers, the American-educated Pastor Martin Ssempa, whipping up support by showing gay pornography. Does all this fit in your mind with the spirit of Christianity, which is to help the oppressed?

SSEMPA: Very much. Very, very much. We need to know what are they doing in their bedroom?

HARRIS: You could play porn between men and women and shock people, too.

HARRIS: His response to that is so graphic, we won't broadcast it here. A few gay Ugandans were brave enough to go on camera to tell us that the American Christians have made their lives much more dangerous.

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE UGANDAN: Sometimes I come back home and just sob, I cry.

HARRIS: Even though Scott Lively and at least one of his fellow American Christians met with members of the Ugandan parliament while they were here last year, they now say they had nothing to do with, and do not support, the bill that would put gays to death. You said before that you had no idea that your time in Uganda would be followed by such a draconian, tough law, but you did say on your Web site, I believe, either you said or you quoted somebody saying-

LIVELY: A nuclear bomb.

HARRIS: Yes, that it was like a nuclear bomb.

LIVELY: And it was, and I'm proud of that, and I hope the nuclear bomb spreads across the whole world against the gay movement, against this attempt to overthrow family-based society and replace it with sexual anarchy. That doesn't mean I hate homosexuals. That doesn't mean that I want anybody to be thrown in jail.

HARRIS: He says it's racist to think a handful of Americans could convince so many Ugandans to consider such a tough bill. Martin Ssempa agrees.

SSEMPA: It's offensive to me. It's offensive to me that every time a black man does something good, you have to say that a white man told us to do it.

HARRIS: There's a common theory that the people who have the biggest problems with gays and lesbians have themselves struggled with homosexual urges.

SSEMPA: No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no.

HARRIS: Have you ever?

SSEMPA: That means everybody who fights terrorism is themselves a terrorist. (LAUGHS)

HARRIS: Are you comparing homosexuality to terrorism?

SSEMPA: It is sexual terrorism.

HARRIS: In the meantime, gay Ugandans, including those whose anguished faces we see, and those we cannot, say they cannot believe American Christians traveled all this way here to make their already harrowing existence so much more terrifying. Dan Harris, ABC News, Kampala, Uganda.

By NewsBusters.org
March 11, 2010
Leave a Comment

ABC Pushes View Whites Should Not Adopt Black Children

On the Wednesday, March 3, World News on ABC, inspired by current efforts to adopt orphans in Haiti, correspondent Ron Claiborne filed a report promoting the view that black children may be harmed psychologically from being adopted and raised by white parents. Claiborne focused on the case of black filmmaker Phil Bertelsen who complains that "he and other black adoptees tell a similar tale, of feeling estranged, cut off from their own racial identity and culture."

Ironically, on the Monday, March 8, The View on ABC, as the group discussed the film The Blind Side which features a white family taking in a black teen, co-host Barbara Walters complained about those who criticize interracial adoption as the more left-leaning Joy Behar and guest co-host and actress Vanessa Williams complained that the film portrayed white parents as being the answer to social problems of troubled black kids.

On the March 3, World News, after recounting that black social workers used to "condemn" interracial adoptions as "cultural genocide," Claiborne passed on that, although that view has softened up, there are still those with concerns:

GLORIA BATISTE ROBERTS, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BLACK SOCIAL WORKERS: Children deserve the right to be with people who look like them, who can understand what they are going through, understand their culture.

CLAIBORNE: At the Spence Chapin Adoption Agency, counselors urge white parents adopting a black child to integrate their lives, even if it means moving to a racially diverse neighborhood.

RITA TADDONIO, SPENCE-CHAPIN ARC: If you look around your table and your guests are all of the same color, then you shouldn't be adopting a child of a different color.

After briefly giving voice to a white couple who adopted two black children whoto defend their point of view, Claiborne again summarized the views of interracial adoption critics: "Not wrong, say some of those who grew up black in a white family, just not easy."

On the March 8 The View, during a discussion of the Academy Awards and the film The Blind Side, starring Sandra Bullock, guest co-host Williams complained: "It brings up a theme for black folks that, okay, here's another white family that has saved the day in terms of another black story that has to have a white person come in and lift them up. And I'm not saying that it's not true and it didn't happen, but it's one of those, do I really want to see the same theme again?"

Walters defended the willingness of couples to reach out to children of different races: "I have to disagree with you. Yes, it is a true story, but I would hope that we would get to the day where the fact that a black family could adopt a white – or that a white family could adopt a homeless black child and it would not be applauded by all the races, I think to say, ‘Oh, it's one more white people helping.’ It was a wonderful story, and it was a story of closeness between two races."

Behar soon jumped in and seemed to agree with Williams. Behar: "But the issue with [The Blind Side] is that it gives the false impression that the problem of poverty and homelessness can be solved by the largesse of some liberal good family ... Liberal meaning, I wasn't referring to liberal as the party. I was referring to liberal as an open-minded and loving gesture. ... But I believe that that does not address the systemic differences in the races, in homelessness, in poverty in the country. And it puts a band-aid on the situation, and it's lauded as a solution to the issue, and it's not."

Below are transcripts of relevant portions of the Wednesday, March 3, World News on ABC, followed by the Monday, March 8, The View, on ABC:

#From the Wednesday, March 3, World News on ABC:

DIANE SAWYER, IN OPENING TEASER: Race and reality: What really happens to a black child adopted by an all-white family?

...

SAWYER, BEFORE COMMERCIAL BREAK: And still ahead on World News, we probe new questions about adoption and race: Should a black child be raised in an all-white family?

...

SAWYER: Tonight, provocative questions about black and white and adoption, raised again by all those adoptions of Haitian children after the earthquake. A lot of people of both races have been asking, are we sure what's really best for the child? Here's Ron Claiborne.

RON CLAIBORNE: They are images of joy, images of happy endings amid so much tragedy. In January, Duke and Lisa Scoppa adopted two Haitian orphans – four-year-old Erickson and six-month-old Therline.

LISA SCOPPA, MOTHER: I just always felt like it would be a really enriching experience for us and for everybody involved, really.

CLAIBORNE: For these children, it is certainly a better life, materially, and a chance to grow up in a loving family. But many black children who were adopted by white parents say there's another side to the story.

PHIL BERTELSEN, DOCUMENTARY FILMMAKER: I didn't feel like I was seen or understood.

CLAIBORNE: Phil Bertelsen was four when he was adopted. He and other black adoptees tell a similar tale, of feeling estranged, cut off from their own racial identity and culture.

BERTELSEN: It creates a lonely feeling.

CLAIBORNE: Bertelsen made a documentary about adoption and race, and the issues of identity that he himself is still grappling with.

BERTELSEN: Ultimately, I am a part of your family. I use my name with pride. But I am also an African-American man in your family. And, you know, you have to see me as that.

MOTHER OF PHIL BERTELSEN: Maybe we were naive, Phillip.

BERTELSEN: I found a moment to say what I had always wanted to say.

CLAIBORNE: Which was?

BERTELSEN: Which was, "See me. This is who I am."

CLAIBORNE: For years, trans-racial adoptions like Phil's were rare after the National Black Social Workers Association condemned them as "cultural genocide." The group has softened its position somewhat.

GLORIA BATISTE ROBERTS, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BLACK SOCIAL

WORKERS: Children deserve the right to be with people who look like them, who can understand what they are going through, understand their culture.

CLAIBORNE: At the Spence Chapin Adoption Agency, counselors urge white parents adopting a black child to integrate their lives, even if it means moving to a racially diverse neighborhood.

RITA TADDONIO, SPENCE-CHAPIN ARC: If you look around your table and your guests are all of the same color, then you shouldn't be adopting a child of a different color.

CLAIBORNE: The Scoppas do not apologize for adopting black children.

DUKE SCOPPA, FATHER: If there are no black families that want to adopt them, and we want to adopt them and make them part of our lives and give them as much love as possible, then I don't know why that's so wrong.

CLAIBORNE: Not wrong, say some of those who grew up black in a white family, just not easy. Ron Claiborne, ABC News, New York.

SAWYER: And let us know what you think. We want to hear what you have to say.

#From the Monday, March 8, The View on ABC:

VANESSA WILLIAMS: And I have to be honest, the one thing about it – I’m sure I have a, I know it’s based on a true story, she won an Academy Award, I’m sure she did a brilliant performance – but it brings up a theme for black folks that, okay, here’s another white family that has saved the day in terms of another black story that has to have a white person come in and lift them up.

JOY BEHAR: Right.

WILLIAMS: And I’m not saying that it’s not true and it didn’t happen, but it’s one of those, do I really want to see the same theme again? You know, Finding Forrester-

BARBARA WALTERS: I’m not sure when you said, I have to disagree with you. Yes, it is a true story, but I would hope that we would get to the day where the fact that a black family could adopt a white – or that a white family could adopt a homeless black child and it would not be applauded by all the races, I think to say, "Oh, it’s one more white people helping." It was a wonderful story, and it was a story of closeness between two races, so I don’t agree with (UNINTELLIGIBLE)

WILLIAMS: I’m just telling you what people have said.

WALTERS: One of the other things that people objected to was that Precious was a bad depiction of black people, and we asked Monique about that because that had been a criticism. And she said it could happen in white and black families.

BEHAR: Lee Daniels, the director, said that it was produced, I believe, in London, with a white cast, so, obviously, but the issue with Blind Sided (The Blind Side) is that it gives the false impression that the problem of poverty and homelessness can be solved by the largesse of some liberal good family which basically does not, does not attack-

ELISABETH HASSELBECK: It wasn’t a liberal family. It was actually a Republican family.

BEHAR: Okay, Republican family.

HASSELBECK: Not that it matters, I’m not going to fact check there.

BEHAR: Liberal meaning, I wasn’t referring to liberal as the party. I was referring to liberal as an open-minded and loving gesture. ... But I believe that that does not address the systemic differences in the races, in homelessness, in poverty in the country. And it puts a band-aid on the situation, and it’s lauded as a solution to the issue, and it’s not.

...

WALTERS: This was not saying this is how, everybody should go out and adopt a homeless white child or a homeless black – it was not a documentary, it was one story of reconciliation and love.

HASSELBECK: And it actually shed light, if you read the book, which, okay, Tim read the book and we’ve been picking his brain about this since this subject has come up many times, and I think that he said he remembers in reading it that it was, it did shed light on the fact that it was the foster system that failed Michael Oher, it was the Memphis school system that failed him. So, in some ways, it actually was a call to action in showing, like, look, these systems which are supposed to help kids like a Michael Oher left to his mother who is dealing with drugs and other children and homelessness, regardless of race, this system is failing kids, and so I think it did shed light on that.

WALTERS: And the other black young people – whatever, they weren’t, they were sort of – were tearing his life apart and picking on him, it wasn’t the whites, it was, anyway, it’s interesting that you had both of these movies that have made-

BEHAR: Stirred up a lot of issues. ... It starts the conversation which we sorely need.

By NewsBusters.org
March 10, 2010
Leave a Comment

ABC and CBS Pass Along Sympathetic Anecdotes from Left-Wing Anti-Insurance Protest

ABC and CBS on Tuesday night picked up on the cause of a small anti-health insurance industry protest in DC organized by left-wing labor groups, but instead of denigrating them as the networks with did with much larger Tea Party and anti-ObamaCare rallies, the two newscasts empathized with their cause, each relaying an anecdote about a victim of the current system. Both ABC’s Jonathan Karl and CBS’s Nancy Cordes did, however, proceed to point out the small profit margin for health insurance companies.

“Taking their cue from President Obama, protesters took their complaints about insurance company premiums and excess profits to the insurance industry and the streets,” ABC anchor Diane Sawyer announced. Karl noted the ideology of the “coalition of liberal groups” and recognized “the attacks are pretty harsh. They're accusing the insurance company CEOs of bribery, money laundering and manslaughter.” But he then showcased “Leslie Boyd, whose son Michael died of colon cancer after he couldn't get insurance or afford a colonoscopy.”

On CBS, Katie Couric set up the story on how “angry protesters targeted the insurance industry.” Cordes found “eleven-year-old Marcelas Owens” who “flew here from Seattle” because “his mother Tiffany lost her job and the health insurance that went with it after a prolonged illness caused her to miss work. She stopped going to the doctor and died at 27 of pulmonary hypertension.” The kid [in the screen capture] delivered a perfect soundbite: “She ended up passing away because she didn't have the equal rights to health care as some people with more money.”

As for Sawyer’s “taking their cue from President Obama, protesters took their complaints about insurance company premiums and excess profits to the insurance industry and the streets” formulation, they were also taking their cue from her. In late February she took to World News to demand to know who will “keep insurance companies from jacking up premiums while making huge profits?” and touted “the growing outrage at insurance companies, the ones that raise premiums on ordinary Americans while racking up big profits.”

Monday night: “NBC Applauds Obama’s ‘Fighting’ Mode as He Catches Up with Sawyer’s Insurance Demonization

The networks weren’t so friendly last year to anti-Obama protesters:

ABC: Obama Critics 'Driven By Refusal to Accept Black President'; NBC Trumpets Carter's Racism Charges

CNN's Situation Room Charges: 'Racial Tinge to Tea Movement'”

Nets Disparage Protests: Getting 'Ugly' and 'Unruly,' Scold Limbaugh But Skip Pelosi

A wrap-up of the coverage from April 15, 2009: “Tea Parties Hit with Hostile & Crude Media Response

The stories on the Tuesday night, March 9 newscasts, transcripts provided by the MRC’s Brad Wilmouth who corrected the closed-captioning against the video:

ABC’s World News:

DIANE SAWYER: And now we go to Washington, the battle over health care reform reaching a heated fever pitch today. Taking their cue from President Obama, protesters took their complaints about insurance company premiums and excess profits to the insurance industry and the streets. And the industry fought right back. Jon Karl watched the confrontation unfold.

JONATHAN KARL: It's now an all out assault on the insurance companies. The first salvo was fired by the President.

PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA: Every year, they raise premiums higher and higher and higher.

KARL: And today, a coalition of liberal groups took to the streets in Washington, marching outside an insurance industry conference at the Ritz-Carlton Hotel.

HOWARD DEAN, FORMER DNC CHAIRMAN: This is a vote about one thing: Are you for the insurance companies or are you for the American people?

KARL: The attacks are pretty harsh. They're accusing the insurance company CEOs of bribery, money laundering and manslaughter. Among the marchers, Leslie Boyd, whose son Michael died of colon cancer after he couldn't get insurance or afford a colonoscopy.

LESLIE BOYD, PROTESTER: I sat with him as he died, and I really thought my heart would stop when his did, and it didn't. And so I do this now.

KARL: But while the protesters and the White House were blaming the insurers, the insurance companies launched an ad campaign blaming others in the health care sector for skyrocketing costs.

CLIP OF TV AD: Health insurance companies' costs are only four percent of all health care spending. Doctors, hospitals, medicines and tests are the biggest slices.

ROBERT ZIRKELBACH, AMERICA'S HEALTH INSURANCE PLANS: There's been almost no focus on the skyrocketing increases in the cost of medical care. You know, our members are seeing increases in hospital costs in some parts of the country by as much as 40 percent. Where's the focus there?

KARL: For all the White House focus on insurance profits, the top insurance companies actually have a relatively low profit margin – about four percent last year – compared to 20 percent for drug companies and 29 percent for biotech firms. And consider this: While the top five insurance companies raked in $14.7 billion in profit last year, that represents just about one half of one percent of total health care costs. But there's one number you can expect the White House to hit over and over again in the coming days – 128 percent. That's the amount that the average American has seen their insurance premiums go up over the last 10 years, Diane, and it's a number that far surpasses inflation.

DIANE: That's a question of the premiums there. Thank you, Jon.       

CBS Evening News:

KATIE COURIC: Now to the battle over health care reform and the push for a House vote by the end of next week. Emotions are running high on both sides of the debate, and, in Washington today, angry protesters targeted the insurance industry. Here's Nancy Cordes.

CLIP OF PROTESTERS: Health care now!

NANCY CORDES: Supporters of health care reform descended not on the Capitol or the White House today-

CLIP OF PROTESTERS: What do we want? Health care!            

CORDES: -but Washington's Ritz-Carlton Hotel where executives from the nation's largest insurance companies were holding an annual conference. Eleven-year-old Marcelas Owens flew here from Seattle.        

MARCELAS OWENS, PROTESTER: No other kid should go through the pain that our family's gone through.

CORDES: His mother Tiffany lost her job and the health insurance that went with it after a prolonged illness caused her to miss work. She stopped going to the doctor and died at 27 of pulmonary hypertension.

OWENS: She ended up passing away because she didn't have the equal rights to health care as some people with more money.

CORDES: Inside the Ritz, attendees were well aware of the anger directed their way.

KAREN DAVIS, THE COMMONWEALTH FUND: We're never going to have a rational system in this country if we continue the way we are now.

CORDES: The protesters were taking a page from the President who has made insurers public enemy number one.

PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA: We can't have a system that works better for the insurance companies than it does for the American people.

CORDES: Now insurers are pushing back.

CLIP OF TV AD: Health insurance companies' costs are only four percent of all health care spending.

CORDES: They point out that the average profit margin for health plans is just over three percent compared to nearly 19 percent for drug companies. They argue it's not their greed that's driving premiums up but sharp increases in the cost of hospital stays, outpatient surgery, emergency room visits and specialty drugs.

KAREN IGNAGNI, AMERICA'S HEALTH INSURANCE PLANS: You know, just this whole notion of "find a villain, aim the rhetoric and go after them," but that doesn't get anybody covered.

CORDES: But for anxious Democrats, health insurers make for an easy target, especially when they jack up rates by 20 or even 40 percent, Katie.

COURIC: Nancy Cordes reporting from Capitol Hill. Nancy, thank you.

By NewsBusters.org
March 9, 2010
Leave a Comment

NBC Applauds Obama’s ‘Fighting’ Mode as He Catches Up with Sawyer’s Insurance Demonization

“During the presidential campaign, candidate Barack Obama often used the phrase ‘fired up’ to do just that to the crowd. Democrats have been openly wondering when he was going to bring that campaign energy and fire to an issue like health care reform,” Brian Williams announced at the top of Monday’s NBC Nightly News,” and “today the President chose an event at a quiet Philadelphia suburb to get loud. He made his case and he rallied the troops and now readies to head into battle yet again on this topic.”

ABC’s Diane Sawyer noted “the President made a direct attack on the health insurance industry, accusing companies of putting profits before patient care” -- which means he was just catching up with Sawyer’s agenda. A couple of weeks ago, Sawyer demanded to know who will “keep insurance companies from jacking up premiums while making huge profits?” and touted “the growing outrage at insurance companies, the ones that raise premiums on ordinary Americans while racking up big profits.”

Jon Karl asserted Obama “hopes to tie into some of that Tea Party anger by focusing on a group that the White House believes is even more unpopular than Congress” as Karl championed a far-left group’s upcoming protest with “wanted” posters “that will highlight the CEOs of the health care companies making the argument that they are the ones to blame.”

NBC reporter Savannah Guthrie began: “Looking to stiffen the spines of wavering Democrats, the President sharpened his attack, lashing out against insurance companies...against Republicans...and Washington itself,” all “music to the ears of the weary Democratic faithful.”

Williams teased his top story: “On our broadcast tonight, fighting words. President Obama comes out swinging on health care. But is it enough to save his plan?”

The lead story on the Monday, March 8 NBC Nightly News:

BRIAN WILLIAMS: Good evening. During the presidential campaign, candidate Barack Obama often used the phrase “fired up” to do just that to the crowd. Democrats have been openly wondering when he was going to bring that campaign energy and fire to an issue like health care reform. Today the President chose an event at a quiet Philadelphia suburb to get loud. He made his case and he rallied the troops and now readies to head into battle yet again on this topic. We begin tonight with White House correspondent Savannah Guthrie. Savannah, good evening.

SAVANNAH GUTHRIE: Good evening, Brian. As you mentioned, the President has been criticized for not taking enough ownership of this issue, for not finding a sales pitch that really resonates. Well today he made an impassioned plea for health care reform. The question is, is it too late to make a difference.

PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA: I do know that it's the right thing to do.

GUTHRIE: His most fiery health care appearance yet in Pennsylvania today. The President ratcheted up the rhetoric.

OBAMA: The need is great, the opportunity’s here, let's seize reform. It's within our grasp.

GUTHRIE: Looking to stiffen the spines of wavering Democrats, the President sharpened his attack, lashing out against insurance companies.

OBAMA: It's no secret they're telling their investors this, we are in the money.

GUTHRIE: Against Republicans.

OBAMA: You had ten years. What happened?

GUTHRIE: And Washington itself.

OBAMA: Every debate, no matter how important it is, with the same question, what does this mean for the next election? What does it mean for your poll numbers? They're obsessed with the sport of politics.

GUTHRIE: The change in tone was unmistakable.

OBAMA: I need you to knock on doors, talk to your neighbors, pick up the phone.

GUTHRIE: As were the old campaign lines.

OBAMA IN ARCHIVE VIDEO: Knock on some doors for me, and make some calls for me.

GUTHRIE: Music to the ears of the weary Democratic faithful.

GOVERNOR ED RENDELL, D-PA: It was a dramatic presentation, the President did terrific. The crowd -- it was like campaign days, it was unbelievable.

GUTHRIE: But Republicans said the President's push was “heavy on snake oil, light on reality.” And once again vowed to make health care the issue Democrats have to run from next fall.

SENATOR JOHN CORNYN, R-TX: Many endangered Democrats who won their races in 2008 or 2006 I think are going to be in a lot of jeopardy.

GUTHRIE: The President's powers of persuasion are about to be tested as never before, as he struggles to convince fence-sitting Democrats to go out on a limb one last time.

DEE DEE MYERS, CLINTON PRESS SECRETARY: He's going to have to personally make the appeal, and he's going to have to make them do it. He's going to say, you have to do this for me, for the good of the party, and for the good of the country. They're not going to want to do it and there are going to be members who lose their seats over this.

GUTHRIE: For the Democrats all the real suspense is in the House of Representatives, whether Democrats have enough votes there is very much an open question tonight, Brian, and of course the President will do all of this again on Wednesday when he goes to St. Louis to try to rally the troops.

From ABC’s World News:

DIANE SAWYER: President Obama launched his final push for health care reform ahead of critical votes in Congress later this month. The President made a direct attack on the health insurance industry, accusing companies of putting profits before patient care.

PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA: Every year they drop more people's coverage when they get sick, right when they need it most. Every year, they raise premiums higher and higher.

SAWYER: Our congressional correspondent Jon Karl joins us from Washington. Jon, is this going to be it the next few days, the President versus the health insurance companies?

JON KARL: Absolutely, Diane. This is going to be the central focus of the President's closing arguments on health care. He hopes to tie into some of that Tea Party anger by focusing on a group that the White House believes is even more unpopular than Congress. And you’re going to see a grassroots version of this as well. Look for posters tomorrow at a protest in Washington that will highlight the CEOs of the health care companies making the argument that they are the ones to blame. This will be a coalition of liberal interest groups...

By NewsBusters.org
March 5, 2010
Leave a Comment

ABC Finally Catches Up with Democratic Scandals; Flashback: 152 Stories on Foley

ABC's World News on Friday night finally caught up with burgeoning Democratic scandals, though hardly showing the same zeal as when the networks incessantly focused on Republican Congressman Mark Foley back in 2006. On Thursday, the MRC's Scott Whitlock documented how this week the ABC evening newscast had “devoted almost six times as much coverage to Senator Jim Bunning and his temporary hold-up of an unemployment bill as the program did for the ongoing revelations that Democratic Charlie Rangel violated House ethics with his trips to the Caribbean [38 seconds].” Anchor Diane Sawyer set up the Friday night story:

And in political Washington tonight, Democrats on Capitol Hill capping a bad week have to be saying thank heaven this is Friday. The latest: Democratic Congressman Eric Massa, from upstate New York, announced he's quitting his seat under a cloud of harassment allegations. What does this mean for the Democratic Party and the future? Here's Jon Karl.

Karl showed House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's promise of the “most ethical Congress in history” and that she would “drain the swamp” as he highlighted Rangel and the announcement Massa, accused of “sexually harassing two male aides,” will resign. Karl recalled:

Democrats rode into power by targeting Republican corruption, and there was lots of it: The Mark Foley sex scandal involving under-age pages and lobbying scandals that landed two Republican Congressmen in jail.

Yet while the allegations against Massa of inappropriate same-sex harassment parallel those against Foley toward subordinates, Massa has barely made a blip on TV: A short item read by NBC Nightly News anchor Brian Williams on Friday night (and a passing reference on Today) while ABC and CBS included him in larger Friday night stories.

Back in 2006, however, the ABC, CBS and NBC evening and morning shows dedicated 152 stories to Foley over two weeks, as documented in the MRC's October 11, 2006 Media Reality Check by Tim Graham: “Foley Feeding Frenzy; Nets Air 150+ Stories: ABC, CBS, NBC Sound Like Perpetual Motion Machine Manufacturing 'Foley Fallout' Against GOP.”

On Friday night, the CBS Evening News also ran a full story on ethics issues with Democrats, as Katie Couric introduced the piece:

To politics now and a Congressman who's giving up his job. Eric Massa from western New York state acknowledged today he acted inappropriately with a male staffer and said he's leaving with quote, 'a profound sense of failure.' Congressional correspondent Nancy Cordes tells us this caps what's been a very bad week for Democrats.

By NewsBusters.org
March 4, 2010
Leave a Comment

ABC Shows Mock Up of Proposed Ronald Reagan $50 Bill

ABC squeezed in a short item Wednesday night on a House resolution to put Ronald Reagan on the $50 bill, a report most notable for the enticing mock-up ABC’s graphics artists created. Anchor Diane Sawyer announced on the March 3 World News:

All right, quick, who is on the $50 bill? If you said Ulysses S. Grant, you’re right. But if some people have their way, that’s going to change soon. There's a move afoot to put Ronald Reagan on the $50, led by 14 Republican Members of Congress who are sponsoring a new bill calling for the change in honor of the 100th anniversary of Reagan's birth next year.

Republican Patrick McHenry of North Carolina (10th Congressional District, west of Charlotte) submitted: “H. R. 4705. To require the Secretary of the Treasury to redesign the face of $50 Federal reserve notes so as to include a likeness of President Ronald Wilson Reagan.”

AP dispatch. PDF image of the bill which lists the 13 co-sponsors.

By NewsBusters.org
March 2, 2010
Leave a Comment

Bozell Column: Our Deficit-Enabling Media

The deficit for last year was 1.4 trillion dollars. The deficit rose as a share of the gross domestic product from 3.1 percent in 2008 to 9.9 percent in 2009, the highest deficit as a share of GDP since 1945. The projected deficit for the fiscal year that ends in September is another $1.3 trillion.

So much for all that fiscal sanity blather from Team Obama in ‘08. How dishonest. Even worse, there’s a good reason to stay pessimistic about deficits as far as the eye can see. It’s called the "news" media.

Legislators who want to get re-elected will clearly want to avoid any spending decision that will create bad national publicity, and our news media, the manufacturers of bad national publicity, will send crying victims down the assembly line at the slightest thought of a social spending cut or freeze.

Exhibit A is Sen. Jim Bunning, a man who is not seeking re-election, which is obvious from his brash, outside-the-Beltway behavior. Bunning pushed the Stop button on the perpetual federal spending machine by holding up a $10 billion package to extend (yet again) unemployment benefits and keep cash flowing to the highway trust fund. Mirabile dictu, he insisted that the Congress should find the money to pay for this – for example, in unspent "stimulus" money – instead of just adding another multi-billion dollar layer to the deficit lasagna.

Break out the smelling salts. The network nightly news crews tried to manufacture instant outrage, earning their reputation as the enablers of incessant and unrestrained deficit-building.

ABC’s Diane Sawyer sent her reporter to expose this mean old man: "One man's stand. A single Senator stops the whole Congress, denying thousands of people unemployment benefits. We confront him to ask why." No spin there. Sawyer framed it as Bunning simply blocking "life support for the unemployed," as if he were standing on someone’s oxygen hose.

ABC reporter Jon Karl and his producer physically blocked Bunning’s elevator while playing victim’s advocate against this alleged victimizer: "We wanted to ask the Senator why he is blocking a vote that would extend unemployment benefits to more than 340,000 Americans, including Brenda Wood, a teacher in Austin, Texas who has been out of work for two years."

Wood lamented her plight: "I've done a lot without and drained my savings, so pretty much my daughter's been helping out, so -- I don't know what I'll do."

Karl added numbers on screen: "Bunning is also blocking money for highway construction. So across the country today, 41 construction projects ground to a halt, thousands of workers furloughed without pay."

On CBS, Katie Couric blamed Bunning for "one of the stranger episodes on Capitol Hill" before reporter Nancy Cordes warned: "Because the bill didn't pass by today, 2,000 federal transportation workers had to be furloughed without pay, 400,000 Americans risk losing their unemployment benefits over the next seven to ten days."

NBC anchor Brian Williams decried how Bunning "had angry words and an obscene gesture for a reporter on Capitol Hill. A sign, perhaps, that public pressure on him is building over his controversial decision to block a short-term spending bill in the U.S. Senate." Reporter Kelly O’Donnell added the same numbers about the transportation furloughs and delayed unemployment checks.

Bunning was right to say if the Congress can’t find any place in the federal budget to trim away a measly $10 billion, they won’t stop spending anywhere. But the media on this story aren’t really on the side of the taxpayers (and debt payers). They’re on the side of Team Obama and the debt builders.

Here’s what Sen. Bunning should have said to Karl and his pushy producer: "If you want to pressure someone who’s savagely causing unemployment, why don’t you go break into your own boss’s offices?" ABC News plans to offer buyouts (and then layoffs) of 400 Americans. Does anyone point a microphone in ABC News president David Westin’s face and ask him why he’s cutting off "life support"?

CBS is laying off about 100 people as they still pay Katie Couric $14 million annually. Why don’t some reporters break into Katie Couric’s next public appearance and ask her why she’s so heartless, not trying to "save or create" a few jobs inside CBS? Would Brian Williams publicly shame her if she brushed that off with a "no comment" or an obscene gesture?

Sen. Bunning isn’t proposing job cuts – or even spending cuts. He’s using a hold, and demanding that legislators of both parties put up or shut up when they declare they’re for "pay as you go" budgeting. When it comes to massive deficits, the media are useless as part of a solution. They are a very loud and propagandistic part of the problem.

By NewsBusters.org
March 2, 2010
Leave a Comment

ABC Berates Bunning’s ‘Politics of No’ for Causing Unemployed to ‘Struggle’ and Lose Homes

For the second straight night, ABC's World News scolded Senator Jim Bunning for daring to block a $10 billion spending bill until it is offset by cuts elsewhere, parading out victims as Diane Sawyer and Jonathan Karl painted him as a nuisance “even fellow Republicans” – that would be a liberal one – oppose. (After the EST broadcast, news broke that Bunning has agreed to some sort of deal.)

Sawyer thundered in teasing her top story: “Tonight on World News, the 'Politics of No.' For the second straight day, one Senator stymies Congress, unemployed Americans struggle and we track that Senator down again.” Sawyer led:

Good evening. Even his fellow Republicans have asked him to stop, but Republican Senator Jim Bunning still has Congress under blockade. For another day, he's kept thousands of unemployed workers from getting their benefits and forced some highway construction projects to stop.

Karl treated the Senator as a child (“Jim Bunning was at it again today”) before he showcased an “unemployed microbiologist in Texas” who, Karl ludicrously relayed -- just two weekdays after unemployment benefits were stopped -- “says no unemployment check will mean she will have to move out of her house” while “Bret Ingersoll of Denver is an unemployed forklift operator, who has already lost his apartment.” So, “today even fellow Republicans were asking Senator Bunning to relent.” That would be Maine's Susan Collins.

After showing video of himself chasing the elderly Bunning while demanding to know “when will those people begin to see help?”, Karl concluded by asserting that “even as Democrats complain about Bunning's behavior, they are thrilled with the political fallout here, happy to be fighting an unpopular Senator over a bill that's got a lot of popular support.”

And Karl and ABC are happy to advance that storyline favorable to the Democrats.

My Monday night NB posting, “Bunning’s Spending Hold Makes Him a Cad to TV Nets, Focus on His Supposed Victims,” recounted ABC's spin (see linked article for CBS and NBC):

....Teasing World News, ABC anchor Diane Sawyer stressed how he’s “denying” people unemployment benefits so ABC decided to “confront” him: “One man's stand. A single Senator stops the whole Congress, denying thousands of people unemployment benefits. We confront him to ask why.” Sawyer framed the story around how Bunning is blocking “life support for the unemployed.”

Reporter Jon Karl concentrated on victims as he played video of himself confronting Bunning by an elevator: “We wanted to ask the Senator why he is blocking a vote that would extend unemployment benefits to more than 340,000 Americas, including Brenda Wood, a teacher in Austin, Texas who has been out of work for two years.” That’s not all: “Bunning is also blocking money for highway construction. So across the country today, 41 construction projects ground to a halt, thousands of workers furloughed without pay.”...

From the top of the Tuesday, March 2 World News on ABC:

DIANE SAWYER: Good evening. Even his fellow Republicans have asked him to stop, but Republican Senator Jim Bunning still has Congress under blockade. For another day, he's kept thousands of unemployed workers from getting their benefits and forced some highway construction projects to stop. Yesterday, you may remember the Senator snapped at our Jon Karl who tracked him down. So Jon got his camera and went back again today.

JON KARL: Jim Bunning was at it again today-

SENATOR JIM BUNNING, ON SENATE FLOOR: It's not a filibuster when you object, and that ought to be brought out clearly.

KARL: -still refusing to extend benefits for hundreds of thousands of unemployed Americans unless Congress comes up with a way to pay for it first. Joung Moon, an unemployed microbiologist in Texas, says no unemployment check will mean she will have to move out of her house.

JOUNG MOON: I don't know what the next step is. So-

KARL: Bret Ingersoll of Denver is an unemployed forklift operator, who has already lost his apartment and is living with friends.

BRET INGERSOLL: Little scared, to tell you the truth. Have you have ever been on the streets? Yeah, it's rough out there. You know what I mean?

KARL: Today, even fellow Republicans were asking Senator Bunning to relent.

SENATOR SUSAN COLLIN, (RINO-ME): I hope that we can act together for the American people.

KARL: Bunning's answer -- still no, unless it's paid for.

BUNNING, ON SENATE FLOOR: I object and let me-

KARL: Yesterday, an angry Senator Bunning refused to answer our questions.

BUNNING TO KARL: Excuse me, this is a Senator-only elevator.

KARL TO BUNNING: Can I come on the elevator?

BUNNING: No.

KARL: Today, we tracked him down again.

KARL, CHASING AFTER BUNNING: How long will this last? When will people expect to see their benefits? How long are you willing to keep this going on?

KARL: Bunning told us he is trying to work out a deal with Democratic leader Harry Reid.

KARL TO BUNNING: Do you think it will be settled today?

BUNNING: Hopefully.

KARL: And are you concerned about how this has played out?

BUNNING: No. No, I'm not concerned, except for the people.

KARL: And when will those people begin to see help?

BUNNING: As soon as possible.

KARL: They're still working on that deal. I am told a deal might be struck by late tonight, but Diane, even as Democrats complain about Bunning's behavior, they are thrilled with the political fallout here, happy to be fighting an unpopular Senator over a bill that's got a lot of popular support.

By NewsBusters.org
March 2, 2010
Leave a Comment

Bunning’s Spending Hold Makes Him a Cad to TV Nets, Focus on His Supposed Victims

A retiring Senator not facing re-election stood up last week for principle, insisting new federal spending be covered by a matching reduction elsewhere, but instead of hailing Senator Jim Bunning as a “maverick” making sure the ruling party adheres to its promise new spending will be “paid for,” television network journalists on Monday night painted him as an ogre, focusing on the presumed victims of delayed spending.

Teasing World News, ABC anchor Diane Sawyer stressed how he’s “denying” people unemployment benefits so ABC decided to “confront” him: “One man's stand. A single Senator stops the whole Congress, denying thousands of people unemployment benefits. We confront him to ask why.” Sawyer framed the story around how Bunning is blocking “life support for the unemployed.”

Reporter Jon Karl concentrated on victims as he played video of himself confronting Bunning by an elevator: “We wanted to ask the Senator why he is blocking a vote that would extend unemployment benefits to more than 340,000 Americas, including Brenda Wood, a teacher in Austin, Texas who has been out of work for two years.” That’s not all: “Bunning is also blocking money for highway construction. So across the country today, 41 construction projects ground to a halt, thousands of workers furloughed without pay.”

On CBS, Katie Couric characterized Bunning’s hold on the $10 billion measure as “one of the stranger episodes on Capitol Hill” before Nancy Cordes lamented: “Because the bill didn't pass by today, 2,000 federal transportation workers had to be furloughed without pay, 400,000 Americans risk losing their unemployment benefits over the next seven to ten days...” NBC’s Kelly O’Donnell echoed: “Tonight, 2,000 Department of Transportation workers are furloughed without pay, highway projects and unemployment benefits for 400,000 are put on hold.”

In contrast, FNC’s Bret Baier offered a friendlier take on Bunning’s stand:

The idea of buying only the things you can actually pay for hasn't been a big seller in Washington for decades. Right now, one Republican Senator is catching all kinds of grief for taking a position that millions of American families have to live by.

Coverage from Monday night, March 1:

ABC’s World News:

DIANE SAWYER: Now, to Washington and a single Senator who has a whole Congress at a standstill. He says the government should stop extra spending now even if it's life support for the unemployed. Jon Karl trailed him. Jon.

JON KARL: Diane, that one Senator is Kentucky Republican Jim Bunning. He is taking a stand that Congress must pay it's bill and he's not backing down. Jim Bunning is a Hall of Fame pitcher known for throwing brush-back pitches and a Senator who isn't afraid to ruffle feathers.

KARL, CHASING BUNNING INTO ELEVATOR: Sir, we just wanted to ask you-

SENATOR BUNNING: Excuse me, this is a Senator-only elevator.

KARL: Can I come on the elevator?

BUNNING: No, you may not.

KARL: We wanted to ask the Senator why he is blocking a vote that would extend unemployment benefits to more than 340,000 Americas, including Brenda Wood, a teacher in Austin, Texas who has been out of work for two years.

BRENDA WOOD: I've done a lot without and drained my savings, so pretty much my daughter's been helping out, so -- I don't know what I'll do.

KARL: Senator Bunning is also blocking money for highway construction. So across the country today, 41 construction projects ground to a halt, thousands of workers furloughed without pay.

KARL TO BUNNING: Can you tell us why you're blocking this vote?

BUNNING, IN ELEVATOR AS DOORS CLOSE: I already did [edit jump] Excuse me!

KARL: Are you concerned about those that are going to lose their benefits?

KARL: Later, Senator Bunning went to the Senate floor to explain he favors the bill but wants to see it paid for with cuts to other programs.

SENATOR JIM BUNNING, ON SENATE FLOOR: If we can't find $10 billion to pay for something that we all support, we will never pay for anything on the floor of this U.S. Senate.

KARL: Bunning suggested using $10 billion in unspent stimulus funds. Democrats said no.

SENATOR HARRY REID: Mr. President, I object.

KARL: Many of Bunning's Republican colleague agree with that him Congress needs to explain how it going to pay for all its spending, but on this one few are as public as Bunning who, by the way, is not running for re-election..

Virtually everyone in Congress supports extending those benefits, including Senator Bunning, and a deal expected to be worked out by next week. But in the meantime, Diane, those who have seen their benefits run out are simply going to have to wait.

CBS Evening News:

KATIE COURIC: In other news, if you're scoring, give Hall of Fame pitcher Jim Bunning a shutout in the U.S. Senate. He blocked an extension of jobless benefits that expire today and stopped renewal of highway programs that kept thousands working. Congressional correspondent Nancy Cordes now on one of the stranger episodes on Capitol Hill.

NANCY CORDES: Workers on the Humpback Bridge in Northern Virginia were told to pack up and head home today. The bridge is among 41 infrastructure projects around the country that ground to a halt due to the wishes of one Senator.

SENATOR BUNNING ON SENATE FLOOR, FEBRUARY 25: And I'm going to object every time because you won't pay for this.

CORDES: Republican Jim Bunning of Kentucky stunned both parties by single-handedly blocking a routine piece of legislation meant to extend certain benefits and subsidies. Because the bill didn't pass by today, 2,000 federal transportation workers had to be furloughed without pay, 400,000 Americans risk losing their unemployment benefits over the next seven to ten days and Medicare fees for doctors were suddenly slashed by 21 percent. Bunning held up the bill because Democrats hadn't come up with a way to pay the $10 billion price tag.

BUNNING: We cannot keep adding to the debt.

SENATOR HARRY REID (D): Where was my friend from Kentucky when we had two wars that were unpaid for during the Bush administration?

CORDES: Under Senate rules, any member can object to moving forward on legislation. Just last month, another Republican, Richard Shelby, employed a similar tactic, but that only held up a few dozen presidential appointments.

SENATOR DICK DURBIN (D): When the victims in the middle of the debate are unemployed people, I don't think that's fair.

CORDES: Republicans contend Democrats are to blame for waiting until the last minute to bring this bill to the floor. Now both parties are trying to work around Senator Bunning to restore all these benefits within the next couple of weeks. Katie?

NBC Nightly News:

BRIAN WILLIAMS: Kentucky Republican Senator Jim Bunning, the former pro baseball star who is not running for re-election, today had angry words and an obscene gesture for a reporter on Capitol Hill. A sign, perhaps, that public pressure on him is building over his controversial decision to block a short-term spending bill in the U.S. Senate. The latest on that tonight from Capitol Hill. NBC's Kelly O'Donnell standing by. Kelly, good evening.

KELLY O'DONNELL: Good evening, Brian. Well Senator Bunning has a reputation for being prickly. And the stands he is taking over the federal deficit means that tonight 2,000 Department of Transportation workers are furloughed without pay, highway projects and unemployment benefits for 400,000 are put on hold. The Kentucky Republican really is a one-man blockade, and he says the Senate has to figure out how to pay for this $10 billion package first, then he'd support it. Now ironically, Bunning had opposed that very requirement.

Democrats, as you can imagine, are outraged, they did not see this coming, so now they're scrambling to try to figure out some way to fix this, perhaps by the end of the week. Brian?

By NewsBusters.org
February 25, 2010
Leave a Comment

At ‘Landmark’ Summit an ‘Exasperated’ Obama Succeeded in Proving GOP ‘Party of No’

“The President often seemed exasperated with Republican arguments,” CBS's Chip Reid empathetically conveyed in reporting on Thursday's health care policy summit before he declared that President Obama had achieved what he needed to accomplish:

Well, he really did, Katie. What he really wanted to do was convince the American people, and more importantly wavering Democrats in Congress, that the Republicans are the party of no. They won't compromise and he now has no choice but to move ahead with Democrats alone.

On ABC, anchor Diane Sawyer led with what she described as “a landmark event today, a televised political duel.” Echoing Reid's assessment of Obama's “exasperation,” Jake Tapper saw “from the Republicans, some old arguments and new frustrations for the President.” George Stephanopoulos decided Obama had “reinforced his bipartisan bonafides, showed that he was reaching out.”

Parting with Reid, however, Stephanopoulos considered it an “honorable draw” since “both sides...gained something” as “Republicans were able to show they had real substantive ideas, there are just differences about how to achieve health care reform in this country.”

Brief excerpts from the ABC and CBS coverage on Thursday, February 25:

ABC's World News:

DIANE SAWYER: Good evening. It was a landmark event today, a televised political duel. Democrats and Republicans sitting face to face for nearly seven hours, debating health care in America. They had been summoned by the President and there was tension, there was anger. But there was genuine engagement. So, will there be action?...

SAWYER: In some sense today's meeting, as you know, was theater, as well, George. So, thumb's up, thumb's down, for whom?

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: I think it was probably an honorable draw. You say theater, it was also political chess, as well. And both sides, I think, gained something. I think the President reinforced his bipartisan bonafides, showed that he was reaching out. I think Republicans were able to show they had real substantive ideas, there are just differences about how to achieve health care reform in this country.

CBS Evening News:

KATIE COURIC: Good evening, everyone. Anyone tuning in to daytime television today saw something unprecedented -- the President and members of Congress holding a summit before live cameras on a major piece of legislation, health care reform. But it was less negotiating than speech making, and as new as this was, you might have gotten the feeling you'd heard it all before. Republicans said let's start from scratch. Democrats said forget it. So where do they go from here?...  

CHIP REID: The President often seemed exasperated with Republican arguments while his fellow Democrats vigorously defended the President's plan and accused Republicans of coddling insurance companies....

COURIC: Chip, did the President, in a way, accomplish what he needed to do today?

REID: Well, he really did, Katie. What he really wanted to do was convince the American people, and more importantly, wavering Democrats in Congress, that the Republicans are the party of no. They won't compromise and he now has no choice but to move ahead with Democrats alone.

By NewsBusters.org
February 25, 2010
Leave a Comment

At ‘Landmark’ Summit an ‘Exasperated’ Obama Succeeded in Proving GOP ‘Party of No’

“The President often seemed exasperated with Republican arguments,” CBS's Chip Reid empathetically conveyed in reporting on Thursday's health care policy summit before he declared that President Obama had achieved what he needed to accomplish:

Well, he really did, Katie. What he really wanted to do was convince the American people, and more importantly wavering Democrats in Congress, that the Republicans are the party of no. They won't compromise and he now has no choice but to move ahead with Democrats alone.

On ABC, anchor Diane Sawyer led with what she described as “a landmark event today, a televised political duel.” Echoing Reid's assessment of Obama's “exasperation,” Jake Tapper saw “from the Republicans, some old arguments and new frustrations for the President.” George Stephanopoulos decided Obama had “reinforced his bipartisan bonafides, showed that he was reaching out.”

Parting with Reid, however, Stephanopoulos considered it an “honorable draw” since “both sides...gained something” as “Republicans were able to show they had real substantive ideas, there are just differences about how to achieve health care reform in this country.”

Brief excerpts from the ABC and CBS coverage on Thursday, February 25:

ABC's World News:

DIANE SAWYER: Good evening. It was a landmark event today, a televised political duel. Democrats and Republicans sitting face to face for nearly seven hours, debating health care in America. They had been summoned by the President and there was tension, there was anger. But there was genuine engagement. So, will there be action?...

SAWYER: In some sense today's meeting, as you know, was theater, as well, George. So, thumb's up, thumb's down, for whom?

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: I think it was probably an honorable draw. You say theater, it was also political chess, as well. And both sides, I think, gained something. I think the President reinforced his bipartisan bonafides, showed that he was reaching out. I think Republicans were able to show they had real substantive ideas, there are just differences about how to achieve health care reform in this country.

CBS Evening News:

KATIE COURIC: Good evening, everyone. Anyone tuning in to daytime television today saw something unprecedented -- the President and members of Congress holding a summit before live cameras on a major piece of legislation, health care reform. But it was less negotiating than speech making, and as new as this was, you might have gotten the feeling you'd heard it all before. Republicans said let's start from scratch. Democrats said forget it. So where do they go from here?...  

CHIP REID: The President often seemed exasperated with Republican arguments while his fellow Democrats vigorously defended the President's plan and accused Republicans of coddling insurance companies....

COURIC: Chip, did the President, in a way, accomplish what he needed to do today?

REID: Well, he really did, Katie. What he really wanted to do was convince the American people, and more importantly, wavering Democrats in Congress, that the Republicans are the party of no. They won't compromise and he now has no choice but to move ahead with Democrats alone.

By NewsBusters.org
February 25, 2010
Leave a Comment

ABC’s Diane Sawyer Touts Rachel Maddow, Hypes Objectivity: ‘No One Knows My Politics’

World News anchor Diane Sawyer touted her objectivity in an interview for the February 28 Parade magazine. The ABC journalist seriously asserted, "I think no one knows my politics." Continuing to hype her journalistic integrity, she proclaimed, "I hope first of all that everyone knows that the facts are what I care about." (H/T to the MRC's Seton Motley.) 

Sawyer also had nice things to say about far-left MSNBC host Rachel Maddow. She enthused, "And I think Rachel Maddow on MSNBC is great television. I love the expression of personality that cable invites." She did throw some praise to the Fox News channel: "I think Roger Ailes, who runs Fox News, is smart as a whip."

Sawyer may think that "no one" knows her politics, but a look at the Media Research Center's 2009 Profile in Bias tells a different story. While at Good Morning America, the journalist recounted stories of dreaming about Bill Clinton and pizza. She also used poetry to compare Hillary Clinton to Jesus Christ and wondered if America was more racist or sexist. A sampling of some of Sawyer's "greatest hits" can be found below. The complete Profile in Bias can be found here.

Drooling Over Dreamy Clintons

"As we know this morning, there is another ground-breaking, crossroads moment. That is for Senator Hillary Clinton, who ran her campaign on her own terms. This woman, as we said, forged into determination and purpose her whole life. As someone said, ‘No thorns, no throne; no gall, no glory; no cross, no crown.’"

— ABC’s Diane Sawyer on Good Morning America, June 4, 2008, quoting a 17th century discourse about Jesus Christ.

"After pepperoni pizza and banana milkshakes once, I dreamed about Bill Clinton."

— Sawyer talking with her Good Morning America co-host Charles Gibson about a study which claimed sleeping Republicans have three times as many nightmares as sleeping Democrats, July 10, 2001.

Are Americans More Sexist or More Racist?

"We have seen new polls this morning about you and Senator Hillary Clinton. Here’s my question: Do you think that residual resistance is greater for race or for gender? Is the nation secretly, I guess, more racist or more sexist?"

— Sawyer to Democratic Senator Barack Obama on Good Morning America, November 13, 2006.

"Ninety percent of Americans say race and gender make absolutely no difference in their vote in the polls. I asked Senator Obama yesterday if he believes it, and he thinks it’s case by case. Let me ask you, do you think that there is secret sexism, secret, secret genderism in this country?"

— Sawyer to New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd on the November 14, 2006 Good Morning America.

By NewsBusters.org
February 25, 2010
Leave a Comment

ABC Pushes Obama’s Insurance Demonization; Couric Asserts Summit ‘Much-Anticipated’

A night after ABC anchor Diane Sawyer demanded to know who will “keep insurance companies from jacking up premiums while making huge profits?”, on Wednesday night she again put ABC into service for the liberal spin machine the night before President Obama’s health summit, teasing: “Big insurance executives forced to answer why they're raising your premiums while raking in big profits.” World News devoted a full story to a hearing held by House Democrats to demonize WellPoint:

We turn to the growing outrage at insurance companies, the ones that raise premiums on ordinary Americans while racking up big profits. Today, executives of the company that insures the most Americans had to answer for big bonuses and lavish retreats while socking clients with a double-digit increase in fees.

ABC viewers were treated to demagogic Democrats railing against the salaries and profits of WellPoint. Then, as if it were a coincidence, Sawyer acknowledged “this anger erupts on the eve of President Obama's health care reform summit tomorrow.” (NBC also ran a story pegged to the House Energy and Commerce Committee hearing, but sans the histrionics.)

Over on CBS, Katie Couric insisted Thursday would bring “that much-anticipated summit at the White House” to “try to save health care reform.” She began with “shades of the Paris peace talks,” ruing “Republicans have been arguing about the shape of the table and the seating arrangement.” Getting to the substance, Couric pleaded: “Does the President have any chance of reaching some kind of compromise with Republicans on health care reform?”

From Wednesday night, February 24:

ABC’s World News:

DIANE SAWYER, IN OPENING TEASER: Tonight on World News, feeling the heat. Big insurance executives forced to answer why they're raising your premiums while raking in big profits.

...

DIANE SAWYER: And now we turn to the growing outrage at insurance companies, the ones that raise premiums on ordinary Americans while racking up big profits. Today, executives of the company that insures the most Americans had to answer for big bonuses and lavish retreats while socking clients with a double-digit increase in fees. And Jon Karl tells us about that highly charged hearing. Jon?

JONATHAN KARL: Julie Hendrickson, a self-employed mother of two, got a letter from WellPoint saying her premium was going up $310 a month.

JULIE HENDRICKSON, WELLPOINT CUSTOMER: In this economically depressed environment, I find the act of raising premium costs to individual policy holders for such high amounts truly unconscionable.

KARL: She's not alone. A study released today shows WellPoint is now pushing double digit premium hikes in at least 11 states. When WellPoint’s CEO appeared, it quickly got personal.

REP. JAN SCHAKOWSKY (D-IL): How much money do you make?

ANGELA BRALY, CEO, WELLPOINT: My salary is $1.1 million. I received stock compensation with a value of $8.5 million, and last year an annual incentive payment of $73,000.

SCHAKOWSKY: Well, of course, it makes sense, then, that you would need a big rate increase.

KARL: The committee also took aim at WellPoint's record profit last year.

REP. BART STUPAK (D-MI): I don't mind you making a profit , but at the end of the year, 2009, a horrible year, you still made two point something billion dollars, and that's not enough?

KARL: Actually, the company’s profits were $4.7 billion, in part because it sold a subsidiary. In each of the last five years,  WellPoint's profits have exceeded $2 billion. The company says its profit margin, about 5 percent, is reasonable.

BRALY: Insurance industry margins are dwarfed by the margins of others in health care.

KARL: WellPoint’s profit margin was far lower than most pharmaceutical companies and biotech firms.

CYNTHIA MILLER, WELLPOINT: We don't like raising our rates that much. We know it's a hardship on these people.

KARL: But an e-mail from WellPoint's chief actuary suggests the company is pushing a rate hike in California to achieve, quote, “target profit of seven percent versus five percent this year.” Documents obtained by the committee also show WellPoint spent $27 million in 2007 and 2008 on company retreats.

SCHAKOWSKY: These retreats hold more sway with your company than the health and wellbeing of your subscribers.

KARL: WellPoint's CEO says she does care about her policy holders.

BRALY: We are on their side. We want to-

SCHAKOWSKY: They don't feel like it.

KARL: The Obama administration also wants to hear from WellPoint. Today, the Health and Human Services Secretary invited the CEOs of all of the top five health insurance companies in the United States to come to Washington, Diane, to talk about those premium hikes.

SAWYER: So the pressure is on. And, Jon, as you know well, this anger erupts on the eve of President Obama's health care reform summit tomorrow. After this year of deadlock and division, Republicans and Democrats will gather together, and some say the future of health care reform in this administration could be at stake. Jake Tapper at the White House, and, Jake, nothing is being left to chance at this meeting...

CBS Evening News:

KATIE COURIC: And looking ahead to tomorrow, that much-anticipated summit at the White House. The President is gathering House and Senate leaders -- Democrats and Republicans -- to try to save health care reform. Nancy Cordes is our congressional correspondent and, Nancy, shades of the Paris peace talks that Republicans have been arguing about the shape of the table and the seating arrangement. What's that all about?

NANCY CORDES: That's right, Katie. They want to avoid giving the President the upper hand so first they said they didn't want him standing at a podium tomorrow where he might lecture them like Professor Obama. And then, when the White House wanted the table that everyone would sit at to look something like this with the President sitting at the center, the Republicans said no, the table should look more like this where everyone would be a bit more equal and the White House said okay.

COURIC: So now that's settled. What about the really big issues? Does the President have any chance of reaching some kind of compromise with Republicans on health care reform?

CORDES: Well, that's looking a lot less likely, Katie. In fact, just a few moments ago I asked the Republican leader Mitch McConnell whether there was any chance for compromise given the fact the President was unlikely to heed his demands that they scrap the entire Democratic bill and start over.

McCONNEL: Unless they're willing to do that, I think it's nearly impossible to imagine a scenario under which we could reach an agreement.

CORDES: So the White House is less focused on this point at winning over the Republicans and it's more focused on winning over wavering Democrats who will all have to hang together, Katie, if they're finally going to pass a health care bill.

By NewsBusters.org
February 24, 2010
Leave a Comment

Sawyer Pleads: Who Will ‘Keep Insurance Companies from Jacking Up Premiums While Making Huge Profits?’

Advancing the Obama administration’s efforts to impugn private insurance companies, ABC anchor Diane Sawyer set up a Tuesday night story on who will “keep insurance companies from jacking up premiums while making huge profits?” Reporter Jonathan Karl explained “the idea from the White House is to keep premiums down by simply limiting how much insurance companies can raise them,” before he relayed the White House spin: “The Obama administration is putting the heat on insurance companies, accusing them of placing profits ahead of health care.”

Karl reported “the top five insurance companies took in $12 billion in profit last year,” as if that’s shameful or excessive, and gave short-shrift to how Republicans would control costs “with a limit on malpractice lawsuits, and increasing competition to allow people to buy insurance policies across state lines.”

He concluded by returning to the Obama team’s claims that their reform regime in itself would lower costs: “As for the White House idea to have that panel control how much insurance premiums can go up, the White House acknowledges that that is only part of the solution – in fact, a temporary fix until health care can go – health care reform can go fully into effect.”

Sawyer introduced the segment by giving publicity to a puny protest: “That California company that wants to raise premiums 39 percent is the target of a legislative hearing today, as more than 100 protesters demonstrate outside.”

(Monday night: “Nets Provide Friendly Reception for Obama’s Plan and Why It’s Needed”)

From ABC’s World News on Tuesday, February 23, as provided by the MRC’s Brad Wilmouth:

DIANE SAWYER: And from health, we turn to health care reform. That California company that wants to raise premiums 39 percent is the target of a legislative hearing today, as more than 100 protesters demonstrate outside. And since the President's big health care summit is this Thursday, we asked Jon Karl to answer the question: Will Republicans or will Democrats keep insurance companies from jacking up premiums while making huge profits? Jon?

JONATHAN KARL: Well, Diane, the idea from the White House is to keep premiums down by simply limiting how much insurance companies can raise them. The Obama administration is putting the heat on insurance companies, accusing them of placing profits ahead of health care.

KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES SECRETARY: These profits are wildly excessive and way over anybody's estimate.

KARL: Under the President's plan, insurance companies would have to justify any future rate increases to a seven-member panel – a panel made up of experts on health care economics, consumer representatives, a doctor and somebody from the insurance industry. If the panel finds a rate hike excessive, the Health and Human Services Secretary would have the power to block it. Will it work? Well, insurance commissioners in 27 states currently have the power to regulate premium hikes, and have shown some success in keeping increases in check. Connecticut, for example, rejected Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield's effort to raise premiums by 24 percent. Instead, they went up 16.5 percent. In Maine, Anthem wanted a hike of 18.5 percent, but had to settle for 11 percent. Lower increases, but still much higher than inflation. And the top five insurance companies took in $12 billion in profit last year.

Republicans, and many health care experts, say you can't do much to keep premiums down unless you deal with the underlying problem – the skyrocketing cost of health care.

SANDY PRAEGER, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF INSURANCE COMMISSIONERS: Price controls on insurance rates are not the cure-all. What we need is meaningful, underlying reforms in the way health care is paid for.

KARL: Republicans say they would keep premiums down by controlling costs with a limit on malpractice lawsuits, and increasing competition to allow people to buy insurance policies across state lines. As for the White House idea to have that panel control how much insurance premiums can go up, the White House acknowledges that that is only part of the solution – in fact, a temporary fix until health care can go – health care reform can go fully into effect.

By NewsBusters.org
February 23, 2010
Leave a Comment

ABC’s Osunsami Highlights High Rate of Abortion Among Black Women

On Monday’s World News on ABC, correspondent Steve Osunsami filed a report that gave rare attention to the high abortion rate among the black population, as he focused billboards in Atlanta put up by black members of the pro-life movement as they try to draw attention to the issue, although he began the report on a negative note by referring to the pro-life bill boards as "causing trouble," and called those who created the signs "anti-abortionists,"instead of using the term "pro-life." Osunsami: "In the heart of black neighborhoods across Atlanta, these are the billboards causing the trouble. The message is simple – that black children are an endangered species because of too many abortions in the black community. The anti-abortionists behind the billboards are black themselves."

After playing a clip of one of the billboard designers who asserted that "we’re trying to raise awareness" of the dire statistics, Osunsami recounted the high numbers of black women who have abortions: "It is true that, of the 35,000 women in Georgia who received abortions in 2008, nearly 21,000 were black women, more than twice the number of white women. Nationally, while black women are one and a half times more likely than white women to become pregnant, the CDC says black women are three times more likely to get an abortion."

After showing a soundbite of a supporter of abortion rights who compared restricting abortion to slavery, Osunsami relayed that "the other side worries that abortion is killing the black community."

A clip of Catherine Davis of Georgia Right to Life was shown: "My people are dying. My people are dying, and nobody cares that my people are dying. And I want people to be, to look at this. Is there any truth to what we are saying?"

The ABC correspondent then referred to the history of blacks back to the 1940s fearing the practice of abortion because it could be used for racial "extermination," though he did not take the opportunity to inform viewers that Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger was known for having such goals.

Nearing the end of the report, Osunsami showed clips of three women who all voiced a negative reaction to the billboards: "The black women we met on the streets of Atlanta feel targeted." He then concluded by referring to the views of both sides: "They say that they hate that these billboards shame black women and black people. The people who put the billboards up say at least everyone’s talking."

Below is a complete transcript of the report from the Monday, February 22, World News on ABC:

DIANE SAWYER: African-American women are front and center in a debate tonight about race and abortion, prompted by dozens of billboards looming over several neighborhoods in Atlanta. Steve Osunsami tells us about a debate stretching back through history.

STEVE OSUNSAMI: In the heart of black neighborhoods across Atlanta, these are the billboards causing the trouble. The message is simple – that black children are an endangered species because of too many abortions in the black community. The anti-abortionists behind the billboards are black themselves.

RYAN BOMBERGER, BILLBOARD DESIGNER: We’re trying to raise awareness in the African-American community to say, "Look, here are the numbers. Here’s what’s happening."

OSUNSAMI: It is true that, of the 35,000 women in Georgia who received abortions in 2008, nearly 21,000 were black women, more than twice the number of white women. Nationally, while black women are one and a half times more likely than white women to become pregnant, the CDC says black women are three times more likely to get an abortion. Loretta Ross says the figures are unfair. For 14 years, she’s run an agency that’s fought to provide black women with abortion services.

LORETTA ROSS, NATIONAL COORDINATOR OF SISTER SONG: To a black woman, when you talk about not being able to control the timing and the spacing of our children, guess what that harkens back to: slavery. Why should we be discriminated against and then have you suggest that, but it’s for the good of the race?

OSUNSAMI: But the other side worries that abortion is killing the black community.

CATHERINE DAVIS, GEORGIA RIGHT TO LIFE: My people are dying. My people are dying, and nobody cares that my people are dying. And I want people to be, to look at this. Is there any truth to what we are saying?

OSUNSAMI: Among African-Americans, this argument that abortion is bad for the race is an old one, but it’s not usually debated so openly. As far back as the 1940s, many black Americans resisted abortion, quietly fearing that abortion was an attempt at black extermination. That changed in the 70s when women’s groups convinced civil rights leaders that they were both fighting a similar cause: the right to control their own bodies. The billboard’s idea that abortion is genocide has made a comeback in some parts of the black community. Fueling this is the growing number of Latinos who have fewer abortions, more children, and are now a larger ethnic minority than black Americans. The black women we met on the streets of Atlanta feel targeted.

UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN #1: It’s offensive to me as a black woman. It’s offensive.

UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN #2: They need to tear it down. They need to put something else up.

UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN #3: I think it’s just a racist thing that they put out.

OSUNSAMI: They say that they hate that these billboards shame black women and black people. The people who put the billboards up say at least everyone’s talking. Steve Osunsami, ABC News, Atlanta.

By NewsBusters.org
February 23, 2010
Leave a Comment

ABC’s Sawyer Celebrates ‘Bipartisanship’ of GOP Senator Scott Brown Voting with Dems

On the Monday, February 22, World News on ABC, host Diane Sawyer seemed to rejoice in the "bipartisanship" of newly elected Republican Senator Scott Brown’s willingness to vote with Democrats on a "job creation bill," as she passed on the "fresh sign" of bipartisanship, and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid’s expression of hope that it is the "beginning of a new day" in the Senate. After correspondent Jake Tapper concluded a report on the ongoing debate over health care reform by noting the unlikelihood that President Obama and Republicans will reach an agreement, Sawyer read the short item on Senator Brown's vote. Sawyer:

And speaking of bipartisanship, one fresh sign of it tonight, newly elected Massachusetts Senator Scott Brown was among a handful of Republicans joining Democrats to clear the way for the passage of the President’s $15 billion job creation bill. And Majority Leader Harry Reid praised Brown, saying, "I hope this is the beginning of a new day, at least in the U.S. Senate."

By NewsBusters.org
February 23, 2010
Leave a Comment

Nets Provide Friendly Reception for Obama’s Plan and Why It’s Needed

President Obama’s health plan announced Monday is little more than the Senate bill with a new tax and federal price control regime, but ABC’s Diane Sawyer touted how “Obama today officially put forward his plan” and CBS’s Katie Couric hailed “a plan of his own,” though she pointed out “it includes no public option.” (In contrast, NBC’s Savannah Guthrie observed: “This new plan of the President's looks a lot like the old plan, just repackaged.”)

All three evening newscasts employed terminology congenial to Obama’s wish to interfere in the marketplace by trumpeting how Obama would “block insurance companies from unreasonable rate increases” while CBS and NBC both advanced Obama’s effort to disparage insurance companies by showcasing sympathetic victims of a health insurance rate hike – pregnant women.

Sawyer delivered a very innocuous summary: “It would give the government new power to control big hikes in insurance premiums, it would give a maximum of nearly $8,500 to a family of four to help them buy insurance and it would prevent insurers from denying coverage to anyone who's already sick or at risk of illness.”

On CBS, Couric segued to “a lot of anger about soaring insurance premiums” and reporter Ben Tracy found a woman “seven months pregnant” upset by a 35 percent hike. She scolded: “You have a right to make money but not at the expense of abusing other people.” NBC’s Guthrie noted “the White House has seized on a California company's decision to jack up rates 39 percent. This Redondo Beach mother was stunned.” Viewers then heard from the woman, near tears: “Do I go without insurance? Does my daughter go without insurance? What are we supposed to do?”

Coverage from Monday night, February 22, collated with help from the MRC’s Brad Wilmouth:

ABC’s World News:

DIANE SAWYER: Now what could be the showdown in health care reform. The televised meeting of Republicans and Democrats is on Thursday and President Obama today officially put forward his plan. It would give the government new power to control big hikes in insurance premiums, it would give a maximum of nearly $8,500 to a family of four to help them buy insurance and it would prevent insurers from denying coverage to anyone who's already sick or at risk of illness.

So we turn now to the White House correspondent Jake Tapper because the President challenged Republicans to meet him with their own concrete plans. What's their reaction today, Jake?

JAKE TAPPER: Well, they're planning to show up on Thursday with a not very bi-partisan spirit. They're going to talk about how their health care approach should be small and incremental and they're going to talk about why the Democratic plan should be scrapped, how the American people do not want it. And that's the plan that President Obama posted on whitehouse.gov today.

SAWYER: But if each side dug in, what does the White House plan to do after Thursday?

TAPPER: Well, they're planning for next week already. The way that they've posted this plan, the way that they have this vehicle ready is to have it passed without Republican support. It's the Senate bill and some fixes to the Senate bill and that's how they're going to have it passed, by putting it through the House and Senate bill and then having this fix pass the Senate through what is called reconciliation rules. That requires only 51 votes, that's very controversial. And then it will go to the House if they have votes.

SAWYER: So they're pushing ahead?

TAPPER: They're absolutely pushing ahead. They have strategy for doing this without Republican votes if Thursday does not result in the legislative kumbaya that there probably will not be.

CBS Evening News:

KATIE COURIC: Good evening, everyone. For a year, President Obama let Congress take the lead in reforming health care, and it fell apart. So today, for the first time, the President put out a plan of his own. The White House says it's the, quote, “opening bid” going into Thursday's health care summit. But Republicans are already rejecting it. The Obama plan would extend coverage to 31 million uninsured Americans, mostly through subsidies. The price tag: $950 billion over 10 years. It includes no public option. Chip Reid is at the White House tonight, and, Chip, I know this plan is $200 billion more than the existing Senate version, and it will not be an easy sell.

CHIP REID: It will not, Katie. Now, the White House claims they're going to pay for that $200 billion mostly with increases in taxes on the wealthy. But it will be a tough sell, and that's not the only bit hurdle in the President's new plan. He's also proposing a brand new federal board called the Health Insurance Rate Authority, and he wants to give the federal government the power to block insurance companies from unreasonable rate increases. Now, there is some politics afoot here. The President would love to go to that big health care summit on Thursday and say, "Republicans, you object to this new federal board? Well, you're defending the insurance companies, I'm protecting the average American."

COURIC: And, Chip, why has the President waited until now to come out with this? I mean, is this a sign of how important health care reform is to him?

REID: Exactly right, Katie. For people who haven't been paying attention, he is still very determined to get this through Congress, and he's going to do everything he can. And with the House and Senate gridlocked, he decided he had to take the lead.

COURIC: All right. Chip Reid, Chip, thanks very much.

They're angry about unemployment, but there is also a lot of anger about soaring insurance premiums. Ben Tracy in Los Angeles has more tonight about insurance sticker shock.

BEN TRACY: In Los Angeles, skyrocketing health care costs have a lot of people feeling sick.

UNIDENTIFIED MAN: Every month, my pocket gets picked.

TRACY: Anthem Blue Cross, California's largest private health insurer, plans to raise rates on 700,000 households in the state. As of May 1, most monthly premiums would jump 25 percent, some as much as 39 percent. Ilene Lisak is seven months pregnant, but she wasn't expecting this letter from Anthem raising her premium from $525 to $708 per month – a 35 percent hike.

ILENE LISAK: You have a right to make money but not at the expense of abusing other people.

TRACY: Nationwide, major insurance companies want to raise premiums by more than 20 percent in Oregon, Maine, and Connecticut, and a whopping 56 percent in Michigan. President Obama wants the government to be able to block large premium increases. Yet insurance companies say they have to charge more because fewer people are paying premiums after losing their jobs, and medical costs keep going up.

BRAD FLUEGEL, WELLPOINT INC.: Hospital costs going up over 11 percent, pharmaceutical costs going up over 13 percent – that's what we really need to be focused on.

TRACY: However, last year, Anthem sent an estimated $525 million in profit to its parent company, Wellpoint. Today, California's insurance regulator announced 732 violations by Anthem, including late payment of claims and misleading consumers.

STEVE POIZNER, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE COMMISSIONER: We want them to, number one, pay all claims on time; number two, pay all claims completely.

LISAK: This is cute, I think.

TRACY: Ilene Lisak just wants to focus on picking out her baby's name.

LISAK: Things that bring you joy, not this. This is not joyful.

TRACY: Not when you can't afford insurance but can't afford to live without it. Ben Tracy, CBS News, Los Angeles.

NBC Nightly News:

BRIAN WILLIAMS: Now, to Washington and politics. We've heard it before, but this really could be a do or die week for the President's plan to overhaul health care. There's a new administration plan on the table, a negotiating session with Republicans scheduled to be televised live. Our White House correspondent, Savannah Guthrie, with us from the White House with more on this tonight. Savannah?
                        
SAVANNAH GUTHRIE: Good evening, Brian. This new plan of the President's looks a lot like the old plan, just repackaged. But senior aides say this is just an opening bid, and they're challenging Republicans to come forward with new ideas other than, dump the bill and start over.

PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA: We've taken up the cause of better health care.

GUTHRIE: The President today unveiled his latest effort to resurrect health care reform from a political near death experience.

VICE PRESIDENT JOSEPH BIDEN: An affordable care act is passed.

GUTHRIE: A version very close to the bill that passed the Senate before Christmas, creating a national insurance marketplace, requiring individuals to buy insurance, but subsidizing those who can't afford it, and banning insurance companies from denying coverage for pre-existing conditions. But the President's plan makes key tweaks. Gone is the so-called “Cornhusker Kickback,” millions in extra Medicaid funding Ben Nelson secured in exchange for his yes vote.

A plan to pay for reform by taxing high-value insurance plans would kick in later, driving the 10-year cost up to $950 billion. And the federal government would have authority to stop insurance companies from excessive premium hikes. The White House has seized on a California company's decision to jack up rates 39 percent. This Redondo Beach mother was stunned.

TATIANA KOROLSHTEYN, ANTHEM BLUE CROSS CUSTOMER: Do I go without insurance? Does my daughter go without insurance? What are we supposed to do?

GUTHRIE: The President has summoned Republican and Democratic lawmakers to a televised negotiation session on Thursday. But if a bipartisan breakthrough doesn't come, Democrats appear poised to use special Senate rules to push the bill through.

ROBERT GIBBS: I do think the President believes there ought to be an up or down vote on health care.

GUTHRIE: Today Republicans said simply, start over.

MITCH MCCONNELL, SENATE MINORITY LEADER: Americans want the administration to scrap its massive government scheme in favor of an incremental approach to health care reform.

GUTHRIE: Well, Republicans say this summit on Thursday is all for show, and that Democrats have ignored their ideas. The White House says their plans do incorporate Republican ideas, so on and on it goes, Brian.

WILLIAMS: All right, Savannah Guthrie at the White House with the latest on where that story stands. Savannah, thanks.

By NewsBusters.org
February 12, 2010
Leave a Comment

CBS and ABC Lament Patrick Kennedy’s Exit as ‘End of an Era’

Reporting Congressman Patrick Kennedy's decision to not run for re-election this fall for his House seat representing Rhode Island, CBS and ABC on Friday night bemoaned the impending lack of a Kennedy in the House or Senate – presuming no other Kennedy runs and wins this November – as the “end of an era.” CBS even created a chart to display the timeline for Kennedys in office, as fill-in CBS Evening News anchor Maggie Rodriguez announced:

It is the end of an era, the Kennedy era. Rhode Island Congressman Patrick Kennedy has decided not to seek re-election in November. So early next year there will be no Kennedy holding elected office in Washington for the first time since 1947, more than 63 years.

Over on ABC, Diane Sawyer plugged the upcoming story: “End of an era. The last Kennedy in Congress calling it quits.” In the subsequent report, Sawyer recalled: “It was 1946 when his uncle John Fitzgerald Kennedy was elected to the House. Then, his uncle, Senator Robert Kennedy, and then his father, Ted.” Getting a bit carried away, Sawyer then asserted: “There has always been a Kennedy in Washington.”

Sawyer, with “End of an Era” as the on-screen graphic, on the Friday, February 12 World News, leading into a clip of Patrick Kennedy recalling his late father, Senator Ted Kennedy:

As we said, for the first time in 64 years, it looks as if there will not be a Kennedy serving in the U.S. Congress. Today, Patrick Kennedy announced he will not seek re-election to the U.S. Congress. It was 1946 when his uncle John Fitzgerald Kennedy was elected to the House. Then, his uncle, Senator Robert Kennedy, and then his father, Ted. There has always been a Kennedy in Washington.

By NewsBusters.org
February 8, 2010
Leave a Comment

Painting Palin as Hypocrite for ‘Crib Notes’ and GOP as ‘Party of No’ While Letting Obama Pontificate

From Monday's broadcast network evening newscasts: CBS and NBC found hypocrisy in Sarah Palin scolding President Obama's incessant use of a Teleprompter while she had “crib notes” written on her hand during her Saturday Tea Party convention appearance, CBS followed by giving Obama two-straight minutes to explain why the public will come around to “connect” with him again and, meanwhile, ABC devoted a full story to “whether Republicans want action or are just the 'Party of No'?”

CBS's Nancy Cordes reported, over a helpful graphic showing the words written on Palin's hand, that while Palin “dismissed the President Saturday night as a 'charismatic guy with a Teleprompter,' she may have been relying on some crib notes of her own.” Cordes concluded: “Her supporters called it an endearing sign that Palin's a real person, while detractors argue it's proof she doesn't know her facts.” On NBC, Brian Williams led the Palin story with how “it happened after a speech where she criticized the President for relying too much on a Teleprompter.”  

Next on CBS, Katie Couric highlighted how, in her pre-SuperBowl sit-down with Obama, she had raised with him that “people are not sure who he is or what he stands for.” Viewers were then treated to a two-minute long answer from Obama, ending with his insistance that when the economy improves “we'll do just fine and everybody will be saying what a connection President Obama has with the American people. Which is what they were saying a year ago.” (“They” being journalists?)

ABC's Diane Sawyer relayed the White House spin:

Now we turn to politics and President Obama on the offensive. He has challenged Republicans to a kind of political truth or dare, a meeting February 25th broadcast on TV to discuss health care reform so the country can decide whether Republicans want action or are just the “Party of No”?

From Capitol Hill, Jonathan Karl began his piece: “Democrats up here are saying that these days Republicans are even saying no to their own ideas. Just look at the last few weeks. Senate Republicans reversed course dramatically on how to reduce the deficit...”

From the Monday, February 8 CBS Evening News:

NANCY CORDES: ...While the former Alaska Governor dismissed the President Saturday night as a-

SARAH PALIN: Charismatic guy with a Teleprompter.

CORDES: She may have been relying on some crib notes of her own. Cameras captured the words “energy,” “tax cuts” and “lift American spirits” scribbled on her hand, which she appeared to refer to in the q & a directly following her speech.

PALIN, LOOKING DOWN: We've got to start reigning in the spending, we have got to jump start these energy projects.

CORDES: Her supporters called it an endearing sign that Palin's a real person, while detractors argue it's proof she doesn't know her facts.

The very next story:

COURIC: Though he's been in office just over a year, President Obama has given more than 160 interviews and taken questions at 26 town meetings. In my interview with him yesterday, I asked him about the criticism he gets from some political analysts that in spite of all that exposure, people are not sure who he is or what he stands for.

OBAMA: ...So if we work hard and stay focused on what matters to people in their day to day lives and make some occasionally tough decisions, and the economy improves and people's lives improve, then I think we'll do just fine and everybody will be saying what a connection President Obama has with the American people. Which is what they were saying a year ago.

NBC Nightly News:

BRIAN WILLIAMS: Sarah Palin's defenders went into overdrive today after yesterday's discovery she had notes written on her hand, the answers to a question that hadn't been asked yet on stage. It happened after a speech where she criticized the President for relying too much on a Teleprompter and then some. Our report on all of it tonight from NBC's Andrea Mitchell....

ANDREA MITCHELL: At the Tea Party convention, she lacerated President Obama.

SARAH PALIN: I've got to ask supporters of all that, how's that hopey stuff work out for you? This is about the people and it's bigger than any king or queen of a Tea Party and it's a lot bigger than any charismatic guy with a Teleprompter.

MITCHELL: Palin wasn't beyond using a handy crib sheet herself, just in case she was asked her top priorities.

PALIN: We've got to start reigning in the spending, we have got to jump start these energy projects.

MITCHELL: A Palin campaign would certainly be different: Appearing before friendly crowds, using Facebook and Twitter to control the message, not answering tough questions....

From ABC's World News:

DIANE SAWYER: Now we turn to politics and President Obama on the offensive. He has challenged Republicans to a kind of political truth or dare, a meeting February 25th broadcast on TV to discuss health care reform so the country can decide whether Republicans want action or are just the “Party of No”? Jon Karl at Capitol Hill, we want to bring you in. What's the GOP answer?

JONATHAN KARL: Well, when it comes to attending that meeting, all indications are the Republicans will say yes. But if it's a matter of resuscitating the President's health care bill, they've already given their answer and that's a firm no.

SAWYER: And what about the administration indictment that the Republicans  are really looking for ways to say no?

KARL: Well, in fact, Democrats up here are saying that these days Republicans are even saying no to their own ideas. Just look at the last few weeks. Senate Republicans reversed course dramatically on how to reduce the deficit...

By NewsBusters.org
February 7, 2010
Leave a Comment

L.A. Times Loves Diane Sawyer, ‘Katharine Hepburn of the Newsroom’

Los Angeles Times TV critic Mary McNamara sounded like she had stars on her eyes as she reviewed the new World News with Diane Sawyer on Friday:

In a world dominated by YouTube moments and professional hysterics, Sawyer exudes an alarming level of elegance.

You can hear the Times, like an echo of Charlie Gibson clucking "let the cables" do the ugly scandal news. Sawyer, the new face of the liberal media aristocracy, exudes class and intellect and verve, unlike the Perky One:

Where Couric has developed a brand of bouncy determination, a seasoned extension of the intrepid girl reporter, Sawyer has always been the Katharine Hepburn of the newsroom, classy in white collared shirts, radiating a passionate but still clearly intellectual concern for what is happening in the world around her....

With her classic features and low-pitched voice, she emanates an intellectual pedigree that she actually possesses -- Sawyer has indeed covered wars and interviewed most living heads of state, she is married to director Mike Nichols, she does hang out with Meryl Streep. A living, breathing member of the much-derided media elite, Sawyer still tries her best to seem like one of us, her voice near breaking as she stands on the tarmac in Port-au-Prince wondering when someone was going to actually deliver all that food and water to the Haitians.

She isn't one of us, of course; the Everywoman points all go to Couric, which is what makes Sawyer's higher ratings so interesting. Like Cooper, Sawyer is smart and seemingly sincere but sleek too, removed from the mainstream by her own physical perfection and gilded life.

McNamara finished:

Amid all the fear and messiness as the old media surrender, spitting and flailing, to the new, Diane Sawyer is a beacon, proof that you do not always have to stoop to conquer.

This writer is clearly stooping to please the ABC publicity department.

AP's David Bauder at least noticed that not everyone is starstruck:

Sawyer hasn't received the ratings "bump" that often occurs when viewers check out something new. During her month on the job, Williams has slightly increased NBC's edge on ABC to 14 per cent from the average of 11 per cent before she took over this season, according to the Nielsen Co.

By NewsBusters.org
February 3, 2010
Leave a Comment

ABC Cheers ‘Dramatic’ and ‘Truly Historic’ JCS Opposition to ‘Don’t Ask/Don’t Tell’

ABC, CBS and NBC all aired full stories Tuesday night on Admiral Mike Mullen’s testimony against “don’t ask/don’t tell” before the Senate Armed Services Committee, but only ABC led with the comments from the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS) as anchor Diane Sawyer called it “a dramatic day on Capitol Hill” and reporter Martha Raddatz trumpeted: “This will be dramatically-debated for days to come, but what we heard today from the military on Capitol Hill was truly historic.”

Katie Couric set up the CBS Evening News story: “It's been U.S. policy for nearly 17 years now, gays and lesbians may serve in the military but only if they keep quiet about their sexual orientation. Today, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff made an impassioned plea to Congress to change the law.”

On NBC, Brian Williams drew historic parallels: “62 years ago today, President Truman ordered the Defense Secretary to take the needed steps to remove discrimination in the military. He was talking about race. Today the topic was sexual orientation, specifically the Clinton-era policy known as 'don't ask/don't tell,' a policy that is now on borrowed time.”

From the top of the Tuesday, February 2 World News on ABC:

DIANE SAWYER: Good evening. For the first time ever, America's military leaders said today it is time to end the Pentagon's 'don't ask/don't tell' policy toward gays. Secretary of Defense Robert Gates and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, Admiral Mike Mullen, said men and women in uniform should not be forced to lie. They want time for the ranks to absorb what this means, but Martha Raddatz says it was a dramatic day on Capitol Hill. Martha.

MARTHA RADDATZ: It was Diane. This will be dramatically-debated for days to come, but what we heard today from the military on Capitol Hill was truly historic. It was the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the highest ranking military officer in the nation, who said today what no one in his position has ever said before.

ADMIRAL MIKE MULLEN: It is my personal belief that allowing gays and lesbians to serve openly would be the right thing to do. I cannot escape being troubled by the fact that we have in place a policy which forces young men and women to lie about who they are in order to defend their fellow citizens.

RADDATZ: Admiral Mullin's statement ran into stiff opposition from Republican Senators...

By Big Governement
January 29, 2010
Leave a Comment

Obama: We Had Nothing to Do With Cornhusker Kickback, Emanuel: Yes We Did

Rahm Emanuel: WH Was "Involved" In Health Legislation "All The Way Through"

Rahm Emanuel: "We were involved in the legislation all the way through."

Video by Real Clear Politics

Hours before his embattled boss gave his first State of the Union address, White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel contradicted President Barack Obama’s claim made just two days before that he had nothing to do with the much maligned deal to get the vote of Sen. Ben Nelson (D-Nebraska) for the Senate’s healthcare bill just before Christmas.

Speaking to ABC News’ World News Tonight anchor Diane Sawyer in an exclusive interview on Monday, Obama denied being involved in what has come to be known as the “Cornhusker Kickback”

SAWYER: A lot of people think you must say at the end of the day, this is not who I was in 2008, these deals with Nebraska, with Florida…

OBAMA: Let’s hold on a second, Diane. I mean, I think that this gets into a big mush. So let’s just clarify. I didn’t make a bunch of deals. There is a legislative process that is taking place in Congress and I am happy to own up to the fact that I have not changed Congress and how it operates the way I would have liked. So that’s point number one.

In an interview with CBS Evening News anchor Katie Couric on Wednesday, Emanuel flatly stated that he and the Obama administration were heavily involved in the Cornhusker Kickback as well as the other deals that provoked outrage from the public and helped Republican Scott Brown win the U.S. Senate seat formerly held by the late Ted Kennedy of Massachusetts.

Couric: As you know, people were pretty disgusted by deals that were made up on Capitol Hill like the one given to Ben Nelson to win his support. If the White House was so involved, was this done with your blessing? But…

Emanuel: Look, we were involved in the legislation all the way through.

Couric: Were you involved in that?

Emanuel: Yeah. I’m not gonna go through all of it…

Couric: But in the Ben Nelson deal?

Emanuel: We were helpful in getting the bill off the Senate floor. And in retrospect the things – as I said to you just earlier, things you woulda done different.

To repeat what Obama told Diane Sawyer about the Cornhusker Kickback:

So let’s just clarify. I didn’t make a bunch of deals. There is a legislative process that is taking place in Congress and I am happy to own up to the fact that I have not changed Congress and how it operates the way I would have liked.

The mainstream media has thus far ignored Obama being exposed as a liar by his own chief of staff. A few conservative outlets have noted a Washington Post article from December 20, 2009 that reported the involvement of Emanuel and other White House staff in the Senate negotiations. With Emanuel himself confirming the Obama administration’s involvement with the Cornhusker Kickback, Obama has some explaining to do. Well, he would if he were a Republican president.

-30-

By Big Governement
January 28, 2010
Leave a Comment

What Was Missing from the SOTU Address

Wednesday nights, I usually watch “Ghost Hunters” on the SyFy Channel. Yes, I am one of those geeks. But this week, I set the DVR so that I could watch President Obama give the annual State of the Union address to a joint session of Congress and the American people.

I might as well have watched a bunch of people using high-tech gadgetry to try to make contact with the other side, because I certainly didn’t learn anything new in this world.

obama-point_1350551c

Anyone who has paid even scant attention to Obama over the past year or two has heard it all before. We heard about the need to act “boldly” and “aggressively” in a crisis, the need to pass climate change legislation, the need to pass the health care boondoggle, the requisite bashing of banks and Wall Street, and, lest we forget, blaming Bush for everything except ABC’s cancellation of the show “Ugly Betty.”

In the private sector, constant passing of the buck gets you fired. In government, it earns you points with your base.

Watching Nancy Pelosi and Joe Biden sitting behind Obama, I was reminded of proud parents watching their child take his first steps. I half expected Nancy to offer him an animal cracker and a sippy cup of apple juice for his efforts.

So, you may be wondering, what was missing?

Gravitas, for one thing. Sure, there was the upward tilt of the head that is part and parcel of every Obama speech. I guess he thinks we enjoy being able to count his nostril hairs. But the entire speech had the tone of a parent lecturing an errant child. All that was missing was a wagging finger and the threat of no dessert for a week if little Billy didn’t stop dragging his feet and clean his room.

What else was missing? Truthfulness. The AP points out at least 10 major fibs contained in the speech, including Obama’s position on lobbyists and how many jobs were actually saved by the stimulus package.

Then there was the real shocker: his smackdown of the Supreme Court because of their ruling last week that lifted limits on corporate campaign donations. “Last week, the Supreme Court reversed a century of law to open the floodgates for special interests — including foreign corporations – to spend without limit in our elections. Well I don’t think American elections should be bankrolled by America’s most powerful interests, or worse, by foreign entities. They should be decided by the American people, and that’s why I’m urging Democrats and Republicans to pass a bill that helps to right this wrong.”

Does this mean that unions will also have more campaign finance restrictions put upon them?

Even Justice Sonya Sotomayor looked peeved, as well she should.

But upon what is the mainstream media focusing its energies? Not the fact that Obama’s remarks were incorrect and in bad taste, but disparaging Justice Samuel Alito for mouthing “not true” after he and his colleagues were attacked by the President in front of the nation. Apparently it’s all well and good for the president to pile on the Supreme Court, but not fine for a member of that court to object – even silently.

And what about jihad? Excuse me, “terrorism.” Wait, make that “man-caused disasters.” Only eight paragraphs out of 110 were dedicated to national security, despite the fact that just a month ago an attempt to blow up an airliner full of passengers over Detroit was narrowly averted; a strong majority of Americans don’t want KSM and his cohorts to be tried in New York; and Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan gunned down his colleagues at Fort Hood, killing 13, while shouting “Allahu Akhbar.” Security interests don’t take a holiday. Neither should the attention of the White House.

Speaking of which, the two police officers who were responsible for stopping Hasan’s bloodbath before it could get worse were special guests at the SOTU, seated in the box next to First Lady Michelle Obama, along with several other military guests. But the traditional “shout out” to such special guests was oddly missing, although the First Lady received two mentions and Jill Biden received one. Why bother having such distinguished guests if you plan to ignore them completely?

Finally, what was missing was any sign that the President is listening to the American people. Three big elections – governors’ races in Virginia and New Jersey and a special senate election in Massachusetts – were bloodbaths for the Democrats and essentially a referendum on the President’s agenda. Nearly 70 percent of those polled say Congress should dump the current version of health care reform. Sixty-three percent don’t believe global warming is a crisis. And polls are showing that even “safe” pols like Sen. Russ Feingold (D-WI) are in danger of being toppled. If Frank Luntz’s focus group on Fox News was any indication, the American people were not fooled by his rhetoric. They’re not looking for “just words,” but results.

Yet Obama says he will continue to “fight.” A true ideologue, he refuses to abandon his beliefs, even if it means political suicide. He even told Diane Sawyer he’d rather be a “really good one-term president than a mediocre two-term president.”

He just hasn’t figured out that people don’t think he’s a “really good one-term president.”

By NewsBusters.org
January 27, 2010
Leave a Comment

SOTU Run-Up: ABC’s Sawyer Lobs Softballs to Rahm Emanuel; CBS’s Couric Gets Ferocious

Both ABC’s Diane Sawyer and CBS’s Katie Couric interviewed White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel as part of their networks’ run-up to tonight’s State of the Union address, but the contrast was stark. While Sawyer attempted to feel Emanuel’s pain over the setbacks for health care legislation (“Two times you have rolled the health care rock up the hill....and two times you have seen it crash back down”), a much feistier Couric interrogated Emanuel over the White House’s political failings.

“As you know, people were pretty disgusted by deals that were made up on Capitol Hill like the one given to Ben Nelson to win his support. If the White House was so involved, was this done with your blessing?” Couric demanded. Moments later, she hit Emanuel with this zinger: “You are considered a master political operative, you were the guy four years ago, of course, who orchestrated the Democratic takeover of the House. Where were you when Massachusetts was going down in flames for the Democrats?”

Back on ABC, Sawyer and George Stephanopoulos laughed about how at a lunch with the press today, Obama seemed tickled by a New Yorker cartoon that showed him walking on water, walking on water, walking on water, and then slipping and getting one of his feet wet. “He said he wants to get a giant one of these and put it in his office,” a laughing Sawyer giddily relayed.

Stephanopoulos used it as a moment to empathize with Obama: “It also gets to a serious point. One of the things that frustrates the White House and the President the most is this whole idea that the man who last year was seen by the press and a lot of the country as cool, confident, in command, is now being portrayed as cold, remote and out of touch and I think what he feels is that he's been the same guy all along.”

Sawyer also weirdly asked Rahm Emanuel how he felt about being branded “the Dick Cheney of [Obama’s] White House.” Emanuel shot back: “That's an insult to Dick Cheney.”

Here’s how both network anchors handled Emanuel in interviews shown on their January 27 pre-State of the Union newscasts, starting with Sawyer’s softballs:

# This afternoon I sat down with Rahm Emanuel, the legendarily high-octane White House chief of staff, who spent the first year of the Obama administration trying to drive all that legislation through. [to Emanuael] The President wants his jobs bill by when, and how many jobs will it create?

# What's realistically the earliest you think you could get that through?

# Two times you have rolled the health care rock up the hill -- [back in] the Clinton administration [as a young White House aide], and now. And two times you have seen it crash back down. What do you say to yourself about this one? [Noticing Emanuel is smiling] Are you that zen? To have come this close, and for the second time have it --

[RAHM EMANUEL: No, I'm not. But I have exercised this morning so I'm a little calmer. I'm not zen about it....]

# But does he give some sense of when he thinks this must happen?

# Are you here until the end of 2010 for sure?

[EMANUEL: Yes.]

# And beyond?

[EMANUEL: Do you mind if I talk to my wife first about it? But yeah.]

# But the critics from your own party have said you have become the Dick Cheney of the President's White House.

[EMANUEL: That's kind of -- the Dick Cheney of the President's White House? That's an insult to Dick Cheney.]

Now, Couric’s questions to Emanuel as shown on the CBS Evening News:

# Earlier today at the White House I got a preview of the President's address from his chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel. I began by asking him what mistakes the President will acknowledge tonight.

[EMANUEL: He is not gonna sit there and kinda list a set of mistakes and then - in his view. What he will do is in a couple places in speech talk take responsibility where he coulda done things different or better.]

# Like what?

# Will you scale back and compromise some of your goals, or will you try to keep basically the same legislation in place?

# The President says he wants to work with the Republicans, but that really hasn't happened so far, so what makes you think it will now?

# As you know, people were pretty disgusted by deals that were made up on Capitol Hill like the one given to Ben Nelson to win his support. If the White House was so involved, was this done with your blessing?

[EMANUEL: Look, we were involved in the legislation all the way through.]

# Were you involved in that?

[EMANUEL: Yeah. I'm not gonna go through all of it - ]

# But in the Ben Nelson deal?

[EMANUEL: We were helpful in getting the bill off the Senate floor. And in retrospect the things -- as I said to you just earlier -- things you would have done different.]

# You are considered a master political operative, you were the guy four years ago, of course, who orchestrated the Democratic takeover of the House. Where were you when Massachusetts was going down in flames for the Democrats?

# Would you say you dropped the ball?

[EMANUEL, taken aback: That I, Rahm Emmanuel, dropped the ball?]

# The White House. The Democrats.

[EMANUEL: Look I -- you know, I don't wanna re-litigate this, but it is no doubt in my mind we could have won that race.]

# Meanwhile, I asked Emanuel if his job is secure. He said, "As long as the President wants me, I'm here."

By NewsBusters.org
January 25, 2010
Leave a Comment

Sawyer Asks Obama to Time Travel: What Would You Say to the Obama of a Year Ago?

Diane Sawyer's interview with President Barack Obama wasn't nearly as sycophantic as the one conducted last Wednesday by George Stephanopoulos, with Sawyer posing mostly informational inquiries about the direction he'll set out in the State of the Union speech as she also raised the huge deficits and whether all future meetings about health care will “be on C-SPAN” as he had pledged?

But she presumed some of the anger at him wasn't his fault -- “People think you must say at the end of the day, this is not who I was in 2008, these deals with Nebraska, with Florida” -- and empathized with the “buzz saw bruising” he gets, so: “Ever in the middle of all that's coming at you, do you think maybe one term is enough?”

In a second segment aired at the end of Monday's World News, she wondered whether he favors the Colts or Saints in the SuperBowl (Saints) and “what's been the most important and useful thing” Michelle Obama has “said to you?” (Help Sasha with basketball shots.) In her “if you were a tree, what kind would you be?” moment, a beaming Sawyer held up photos of Obama at the inauguration and his first congressional speech and wondered: “What would you say to him?” (Obama: “You're going to look older in a year.”)

Monday's Nightline and Tuesday's Good Morning America will also carry portions of the interview.

From January 20: “Stephanopoulos Frets Obama Too Ambitious, Seeks Confirmation He's Had 'Most Fulfilling' Year.

The questions from Sawyer to Obama shown in the two interview excerpts aired on the Monday, January 25 World News with Diane Sawyer on ABC. In the segment which led the newscast:

> Republicans are already out today saying what you're talking about so far for Wednesday night is not going to create any new jobs.

> But what is it going to be? New stimulus money -- as we know, in the House, they've talked about $170 billion or so for new stimulus money?

> But a year ago, you said the first item on the agenda, a year ago, jobs. [archive clip of Obama] Painted a picture of jobs from coast to coast.

> New proposals? [in State of the Union address] Something surprising?

> Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke going to be confirmed. Do you guarantee the markets that he's going to the Fed Chairman?

> Even though Barbara Boxer, John McCain have come out and said look -- John McCain said he's the guy who steered into the iceberg. Barbara Boxer said we need a representative of Main Street.

> To all the people terrified about the deficits, $1.5 trillion more this year than taken in expected next year. Can you guarantee them still that there will be no taxes on anybody who makes under $250,000 a year? That's still the absolute rule?

> Health care -- going forward, should all the conversations, all the meetings be on C-SPAN?

> People think you must say at the end of the day, this is not who I was in 2008, these deals with Nebraska, with Florida.

> A personal question, if I can, because a lot of people heard you at the Baptist church say sometimes in these buzz saw bruising seasons you sit and confront your own doubts [clip of Obama from January 17]. Ever in the middle of all that's coming at you, do you think maybe one term is enough?

> Two diametrically opposing paths have been laid out by your supporters. One is come out swinging, go down for history, let everybody -- let the Republicans filibuster and do it and the other is slow down, scale back, less money. Which is it going to be?

In a segment which ended the newscast:

> Colts/Saints?

> [Holding up two photos of Obama] Two pictures: inauguration, first congressional speech. What would you say to him?

> [On Michelle Obama] What's been most the important and useful thing she's said to you?

The ABCNews.com transcript of the entire session.

By NewsBusters.org
January 21, 2010
Leave a Comment

Nets Decry Campaign Finance Ruling, Fail to Hail Victory for Freedom of Speech

The unencumbered ability to sway voters is great for the news media, but journalists are outraged others could re-acquire the same First Amendment rights. Instead of painting a victory for free speech in the Supreme Court's ruling that corporations, non-profit groups and unions can spend money to influence elections, the Thursday broadcast network evening newscasts feared a ruinous future:

“Opening floodgates” to “big money” with “corporate interests having even more of a say” by “attacking political candidates,” resulting in “the real danger...that the candidates are just going to get drowned out” as “special interests” may “take over political campaign advertising.”

“On that subject of big money and power,” ABC anchor Diane Sawyer intoned, “a blockbuster decision from the Supreme Court today opening floodgates for companies and unions to spend all the money they want attacking political candidates.” On NBC, anchor Brian Williams previewed “the news today that will result in big companies and corporate interests having even more of a say in American politics and campaigns.”

read more

By NewsBusters.org
January 19, 2010
Leave a Comment

ABC Empathizes with White House: Coakley Loss ‘Shakespearean,’ ‘Tragedy of Greek Proportions’

ABC on Monday night again empathized with the Obama White House’s disbelief that they could lose “Ted Kennedy’s Senate seat” -- and thus ObamaCare -- if Republican Scott Brown beats Democrat Martha Coakley in Tuesday’s special election in Massachusetts. George Stephanopoulos saw a “Shakespearean” tragedy just over a week after PBS’s Judy Woodruff, on ABC’s This Week, described such a scenario as “a tragedy of Greek proportions.”
 
Stephanopoulos conveyed on Monday’s World News how “Democrats in the White House and Capitol Hill are braced for a shattering loss. And it's really hard for them to wrap their head around it, the idea that...health care reform may be in peril because Democrats can't hold the seat that Teddy Kennedy held for nearly half a century. You know, one White House official summed it up in a single word: ‘Shakespearean.’”

During the roundtable on the January 10 This Week, CNN and NBC veteran Woodruff despaired: “I was just going to say, quoting somebody in the White House, a tragedy of Greek proportions if Ted Kennedy's successor is the one, is the one who was responsible for the death of health care.”

Disappointed ABC anchor Diane Sawyer pleaded to Stephanopoulos Monday evening: “After all these months of fighting for it, and then may be slipping away at the last minute for the White House. But are there options on health care reform? Other ways to go to get a vote?”

The MRC’s Rich Noyes caught this exchange on the Monday, January 18 World News with Diane Sawyer:

DIANE SAWYER: What are they saying in the White House tonight, George?
                        
GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: Not much they can say, Diane, but Democrats in the White House and Capitol Hill are braced for a shattering loss. And it's really hard for them to wrap their head around it, the idea that John [Berman] just alluded to, that Democrats -- that health care reform may be in peril because Democrats can't hold the seat that Teddy Kennedy held for nearly half a century. You know, one White House official summed it up in a single word: “Shakespearean.”

SAWYER: After all these months of fighting for it, and then may be slipping away at the last minute for the White House. But are there options on health care reform? Other ways to go to get a vote?

STEPHANOPOULOS: You know, there's only one realistic option, and it's a longshot. The idea that Democrats in the White House and Capitol Hill are working on right now is to convince enough House Democrats to simply pass the bill that passed the Senate, which is not exactly like the House bill -- there are differences in abortion, there are differences in the way that taxation happens -- but the argument to those Democrats will be, to the progressives: "It's never going to get any better than this;" and to the conservatives and moderates who've already taken the tough vote, that they're going to have the worst of both worlds if they get nothing for it.

But, Diane, that is a very long shot. I think most Democrats right now would agree with Congressman Barney Frank, a loyal supporter of the President, who said that health reform in this form is likely dead if Coakley loses.

SAWYER: Dead, period? Or would they revive it later on?

STEPHANOPOULOS: They'll have to go back to the drawing board, try to get something else later on, but the form that basically passed in the House and the Senate, that basic structure, hard to get through.

SAWYER: So much riding on tomorrow for this White House. Thanks to you, George.

By NewsBusters.org
January 9, 2010
Leave a Comment

ABC Profiles Campaign Urging Folks To Move Money From Big Banks

It goes without saying that what America's struggling banking industry doesn't need is for all of its depositers to withdraw their funds.

Regardless of this seemingly obvious truth, the folks at ABC and "World News with Diane Sawyer" actually did a report Friday profiling a campaign started by the far-left website the Huffington Post to get people to pull their money from the larger national banks and deposit their savings into "smaller, community-oriented financial institutions."

Although ABC's David Muir pointed out to Arianna Huffington how "a lot of people are going to look at this and say you are encouraging a run on the bank," the network along with the show's producers hypocritically ignored how they were doing precisely that by airing this report (video embedded below the fold with transcript):

DIANE SAWYER, HOST: And now, Americans mad as heck at big American banks and the ones particularly raising credit card fees while making profits. Earlier this week, David Muir took on this issue, and tonight, he's back with a grassroots movement crying enough.

Stop the tape!

The Huffington Post is a well-funded website that received a $5 million initial investment in 2006 from the venture capital firm SoftBank Capital. Calling anything it does grassroots is absurd! But I digress: 

DAVID MUIR: It was Monday, our report on banks raising rates on credit cards before those new rules protecting consumers can take effect and we heard from you. One viewer e-mailed, "We bail them out and they raise rates. Priceless..." But many of you took it a step further -- "Fight the power," wrote one. Another writes, "My secret, very simple, a credit card from a credit union." And it turns out thousands of Americans are doing the same thing, trading their banks on Wall Street for the ones on Main Street.

UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: And I'm here at Bank of America to close my account.

MUIR: This woman even documented the move on YouTube after her credit card rate jumped 27%.

UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: Basically just closed out both of my accounts, gave me some money, and now I'm on my way. Weird.

MUIR: The Huffington Post website is urging its readers to move your money.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE FROM "IT'S A WONDERFUL LIFE")

ERNIE THE CABBIE: Don't look now, but there's something going on over that at the bank, George.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

MUIR: Even posting a film with clips of Jimmy Stewart's iconic small-town banker George Bailey. Arianna Huffington told me, put in your zip code and they'll find you a hometown bank.

ARIANNA HUFFINGTON: The response has been dramatic. Over half of the zip codes in the country have already been searched.

MUIR: 81% of the banks that failed last year were these smaller community banks.

Correct, thereby making this campaign rather absurd!

HUFFINGTON: The only banks that come up when you put in your zip code are solvent secure banks.

MUIR: Arianna, you know that a lot of people are going to look at this and say you are encouraging a run on the bank.

Exactly, David. So why didn't you and your bosses realize the hypocrisy in making such a statement in a report that made your concerns moot?

HUFFINGTON: I'm convinced that when the big banks see real competition from the community banks and credit unions, they will change their behavior.

This would have been a nice time for Muir to say that such change could come after an organized run on these banks forced more financial insolvencies, layoffs, and further damage to an already teetering economy.

Unfortunately, this was lost on Muir and his producers who instead continued promoting the campaign:

MUIR: In fact, there's a fast-growing Facebook group dedicated to this. April Schiller switched. "How amazing," she writes "to actually talk to humans who remember me." So we went to find her at her new hometown bank.

APRIL SCHILLER: I received thank yous, I got a hand-signed Christmas card from them which I was really impressed with. It was great.

SAWYER: So David, how many people are we talking about?

MUIR: Take the Facebook page in particular, the group dedicated to moving your money. It started just a week and a half ago. Tonight it's more than 8,000 members. And you'll remember the American Bankers Association talked to us earlier this week saying, "If you don't like the rising rates, you can vote with your feet, go to a competitor." Tonight, proof that some customers, very angry customers, are doing just that.

SAWYER: Some of the grassroots heard from out there. Thank you, David.

With ten percent unemployment, and America's banks struggling to get back on their feet, ABC should be ashamed of itself for reporting on this campaign by Huffington and her ilk.

I guess these people won't be happy until everyone in the United States is out of work thereby requiring government assistance to stay alive. 

How truly sad. 

By NewsBusters.org
January 8, 2010
Leave a Comment

ABC Profiles Tea Party & Cites Fmr Obama Supporters, Finds Moderates ‘Scrambling to Show Support’

On Thursday’s World News, ABC correspondent Kate Snow filed a report that avoided portraying Tea Party activists as extremists, instead conveying the movement’s growing appeal and the fact that even some former Barack Obama supporters have signed on. Snow: "The majority of supporters are long-time Republicans like Danita, but there are growing numbers of independents, and even some former Obama supporters."

After recounting the movement’s recent successes in bringing down moderate political figures for not being conservative enough, Snow related that "moderates are scrambling to show their support." The piece also included a soundbite of ABC News contributor Matthew Dowd who suggested that Democrats are making a mistake in "trying to marginalize" the movement. Dowd: "I think Republicans definitely dismiss this at their peril. I also think Democrats, by trying to marginalize it, underestimate the anger out there."

Below is a complete transcript of the report from the Thursday, January 7, World News on ABC:

DIANE SAWYER: Up next, in politics, it was confirmed today that former Governor Sarah Palin will keynote two political conventions in the next month – not Republicans or Democrats, but the anti-establishment movement of the Tea Party. A month ago, we saw those heated town hall meetings on health care, but Kate Snow says since then the Tea Party has become a more organized political force – at least 3,000 outposts taking aim at moderate candidates for office and taking them down.

KATE SNOW: It is a movement with momentum, and now it's taking politicians down. The biggest example this week, Florida's Republican Party chairman, brought down in part by pressure from Tea Party activists who've rallied around a young outspoken conservative in the Florida Senate race. His opponent, Republican Governor Charlie Crist, may be the next Tea Party victim. Where once Obama's army had the passion, columnist David Brooks wrote, "Now the Tea Party brigades have all the intensity."

MATTHEW DOWD, ABC NEWS CONTRIBUTOR: I think Republicans definitely dismiss this at their peril. I also think Democrats, by trying to marginalize it, underestimate the anger out there.

SNOW: Their influence is showing up all over the country. In California, the first woman to lead a Fortune 500 company may lose her bid for Senate because she's not conservative enough. In Kentucky, the son of former presidential candidate Ron Paul is riding the Tea Party wave.

DANITA KILCULLEN, TEA PARTY FORT LAUDERDALE: We just don't give up. We're unrelenting.

SNOW: Danita Kilcullen has been bringing people to this corner in Fort Lauderdale every Saturday for 46 weeks, then posting it on YouTube.

KILCULLEN: The tea parties across America are going to have a great deal to say about who is in office.

SNOW: The majority of supporters are long-time Republicans like Danita, but there are growing numbers of independents, and even some former Obama supporters.

NATE WHIGHAM, GEORGIA TEA PARTY: The Tea Party kind of aligned what I was already feeling with their three core values.

SNOW: They organize mainly online not bound by religion but loosely linked by an overarching philosophy for small government, against deficit spending and against raising taxes. There's no real leader, but star power – Sarah Palin and TV host Glenn Beck whose empire includes everything from a Christmas picture book to ads to a live stage show – have both given face to the movement. And moderates are scrambling to show their support.

UNIDENTIFIED MAN: I've added a tea bag.

SNOW: A tea bag in his pocket, armor for a former Congressman running for Senate. And just recently the first Tea Party political action committee was created. That means money – $13,000 so far, Diane, and growing. This is a force to watch.

By NewsBusters.org
January 8, 2010
Leave a Comment

ABC’s Sawyer Hails Obama: ‘Buck Stops Here’ an ‘Echo of Another Young President’

Two quick items from Thursday’s World News. ABC anchor Diane Sawyer heard “an echo of another young President in another time” in President Obama’s “the buck stops here” taking of responsibility for the failed Christmas Day terrorist plot as George Stephanopoulos explained her reference: “John Kennedy after the Bay of Pigs....The President took responsibility, his popularity shot up. The White House is calculating with the President taking personal responsibility, they can put this behind them.”

Minutes later, after a report on cold weather, Sawyer considered it evidence of “climate change.” She asked Sam Champion, a global warming devotee: “We've all been unnerved about talk about climate change. Is this one of those strange events that signals to you, even you, this is something brand new?” From Chicago, Champion, citing the “cold snap” in North America, Asia and Northern Europe, concurred “it certainly is a question that needs to be looked into.”

Just another example of painting any weather condition – too hot or too cold – as evidence of “climate change.”

From the Thursday, January 7 World News with Diane Sawyer:

DIANE SAWYER: George, I have to say, 'the buck stops here.' It's an echo of another young President in another time.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: John Kennedy after the Bay of Pigs. Huge intelligence failures at the Bay of Pigs. The President took responsibility, his popularity shot up. The White House is calculating with the President taking personal responsibility, they can put this behind them.

BRIAN ROSS: Then a short time later, he fired the head of the CIA.

...

SAWYER: We've all been unnerved about talk about climate change. Is this one of those strange events that signals to you, even you, this is something brand new?

SAM CHAMPION: It would be difficult to make that assessment just looking at the North America cold snap, Diane. But when we know that Asia is in a cold snap, record-breaking, as well, and Northern Europe, then it certainly is a question that needs to be looked into.

By NewsBusters.org
December 27, 2009
Leave a Comment

CNN Guest’s Sexual Joke: ‘I Have No Problem Being Right on Top of Diane Sawyer’

Appearing as a guest on CNN’s Reliable Sources on Sunday, TVNewser’s Gail Shister, who was inducted into the National Lesbian and Gay Journalists Association Hall of Fame in 2008, made a sexual joke about new World News anchor Diane Sawyer that a male guest likely couldn’t have gotten away with. After the Baltimore Sun’s David Zurawik had finished discussing the visual effect of ABC zooming in the camera so Sawyer appears closer to the viewer than previous hosts, Shister began her response with a sexual joke about Sawyer:

Well, first of all, Howie, I personally have no problem being right on top of Diane Sawyer, so that was not a problem for me. I think when you’ve got somebody that classy and visually attractive, why not get up close with her? I don’t think they’re going to stay that close every single newscast. I thought she made a seamless transition. I was pleasantly surprised at how seamless it was.

Below is a transcript of the relevant portion of the Sunday, December 27, Reliable Sources on CNN:

HOWARD KURTZ: Would you say, as an anchor, that Diane Sawyer has a more emotional style?

DAVID ZURAWIK, BALTIMORE SUN: There’s no doubt about it. And, in fact, they’re presenting her in a closer and more personal way.

KURTZ: How?

ZURAWIK: Well, the camera is much tighter on her, for one thing. I was struck the first night. I thought, "Oh, my God, we’re right on top of her." But it works with her, it works with her. Across the board, that newscast cosmetically is a warmer, more inviting place. The lights seem brighter. The graphics – and they said they are using new graphics – seem larger. It’s very attractive. Even one of the nights like last week, Howei, she was wearing a pinstripe suit. But it was either beige or cream. It was softer. It wasn’t gray or black. It’s a much more inviting kind of place.

KURTZ: Usually, we don’t do fashion reviews on this program, so I’ll go to Gail Shister. All right, all right.

ZURAWIK: No, no, no, but they haven’t sacrificed the journalism one bit. That’s the point I want to make, Howie.

KURTZ: Gail Shister, how well did Diane make the transition form morning news to the evening shows?

GAIL SHISTER, TVNEWSER: Well, first of all, Howie, I personally have no problem being right on top of Diane Sawyer, (ONE OF THE MEN CAN BE HEARD STARTING TO LAUGH UNDER HIS BREATH) so that was not a problem for me. I think when you’ve got somebody that classy and visually attractive, why not get up close with her? I don’t think they’re going to stay that close every single newscast. I thought she made a seamless transition. I was pleasantly surprised at how seamless it was.

By NewsBusters.org
December 24, 2009
Leave a Comment

ABC Touts Robert Byrd’s Dedication to ‘Health Care Champion’ Kennedy

On Thursday's World News, ABC anchor Diane Sawyer took the time to devote an entire story to 92-year-old Democratic Senator Robert Byrd’s vote for the Democratic health care bill, which the West Virginia Democrat dedicated to former Senator Ted Kennedy, whom the ABC anchor described as "health care champion Ted Kennedy." Sawyer recounted that Byrd had to be brought into the Senate chamber in a wheel chair several times recently to cast votes related to the bill.

On the NBC Nightly News, correspondent Kelly O’Donnell only mentioned Byrd’s dedication to Kennedy within her piece on the Senate vote and recounted that "off camera, that moment brought tears to Kennedy’s widow Vicky," while Byrd was not mentioned at all on the CBS Evening News.

Below is a complete transcript of Diane Sawyer’s story from the Thursday, December 24, World News on ABC:

DIANE SAWYER: And, by the way, Jon mentioned the crucial vote of Senator Robert Byrd of West Virginia – 92 years old. Well, we were there this morning when he came out his door. Before dawn this morning on a frigid Christmas Eve, a frail man in a wheelchair greets reporters with a rallying cry.

SENATOR ROBERT BYRD (D-WV): Let's go!

SAWYER: Fifty-six years in Congress, 18,000 votes, a 98 percent attendance record, the longest serving U.S. Senator in history told ABC's cameras:

BYRD: I do what duty tells me to do.

SAWYER: Over the past four days, he has repeatedly shivered his way up to the Capitol to vote, including at 1:00 in the morning. In part, it's personal. You may remember his emotional speech to the floor, shortly after his good friend, health care champion Ted Kennedy, was diagnosed with brain cancer.

BYRD, CRYING IN THE SENATE, DATED MAY 2008: Ted, my dear friend, I love you.

SAWYER: This morning, what did Senator Byrd think as he was helped into his wheelchair?

BYRD: This is for Ted.

SAWYER: And with that, he boarded the elevator up and into the chamber, where he voted yes and shouted again.

BYRD: This is for my friend Ted Kennedy: Aye!

SAWYER: Old comrades, old friends – one gone, one carrying on. And by the way, Senator Kennedy's wife Vicky was in the chamber watching.

By NewsBusters.org
December 14, 2009
Leave a Comment

George Stephanopoulos Panned By ‘Good Morning America’ Viewers

ABC's George Stephanopoulos may have gotten a warm reception from his new co-hosts on "Good Morning America," but fans of the show appear very displeased.

In fact, judging from the comments piling up at the network's news website, the former Clinton administration official's debut is getting similar reviews as film disasters "Heaven's Gate" and "Ishtar."

Maybe worse.

On the other hand, with almost 47,000 comments already logged at 4:45 PM EST, at least this change has gotten people's attention (spelling and grammatical errors left intact, h/t Mediaite):

  • I will probably not watch GMA any more due to George being on the show. I don't like him. If they were going to do rearraning, then Chris should be the Co-ancchor and Juju can be the news person. 
  • No more for me - Chris should have been the new anchor - can't stand George- hello Meredith and NBC
  • wILLNO LONGER WATCH WILL NO LONGER WATCH GMA. GEORGE IS A WELL KNOWN LIBERAL DEMOCRAT, HAS OPENLY EXPRESSED HIS LOVE OF OBAMA. HE CANNOT BE UNBIASED WHEN REPORTING ABOUT THE ADMINISTRATION. SOOOO LONG GMA. I'LL BE WATCHING FOX
  • If the plan is for George to join the evening news.....please send him now...GMA has been more than just a news show...how stiff and boring now...If the intention was to change the dynamic........success has been achieved. I have enjoyed GMA for too many years to count.....what a disappointment today......Speaking of which I watched a portion of the TODAY show, a group that is comfortable and down to earth. Qualities not present with the new GMA... Bring back Chris.....
  • Today I kissed GMA goodbye. If all I wanted was politics, I'd watch a political show. Chris would definitely be a much better choice to replace Diane than George. There was so much charisma and chemistry with Chris, Sam and Robin. ABC you really blew it this time!!!
  • I will be joining millions of viewers who will no longer be watching GMA. Without Chris Cuomo, GMA is doomed!!!. Watching the first 5 minutes this morning was like watching the beginning of a funeral. No thank you!!! A disgrace GMA that you did not give him a well deserved tribute on his last day. I can hardly wait to join him on 20/20 where he is destined to soar to greatness!!! Goodbye GMA. Welcome to 20/20 Chris. You are the man!!!
  • are the ABC executives - or anyone on ABC for that matter - ever going to acknowledge these comments? the majority of your viewers do not agree with the changes you have made and the way you handled chris cuomo's departure. we need you to acknowledge this and give some sort of explanation. do you acknowledge these "shout outs" only when they are directed at someone other than you?
Gives you a warm feeling inside, doesn't it?

By NewsBusters.org
December 10, 2009
Leave a Comment

MRC’s Bozell Announces Bias Profiles for All Barack Channel (ABC) Anchors

To coincide with the many changes at ABC News that begin today with George Stephanopoulos accepting the offer to replace Diane Sawyer as co-host of Good Morning America, NewsBusters's parent organization the Media Research Center (MRC) has unveiled their freshly updated Profiles in Bias of both left wing icons, as Sawyer will step into the World News anchor shoes of Charles Gibson later this month.

These profiles document the 12 years that Stephanopoulos has dedicated to left wing advocacy and more than 10 years Sawyer has delivered on-camera at ABC. From lavishing praise to liberals like Nancy Pelosi, the Clintons and President Obama to undermining conservatives and pushing their personal policy agendas, both anchors have provided endless of examples to cite. These Profiles in Bias also include more than a dozen videos of on-camera lowlights.

"This is nothing more than a pathetic game of lefty musical chairs," MRC President and NewsBusters Publisher Brent Bozell scoffed. "The All Barack Channel has managed to keep all their liberal blood in the family, rotating anchor chairs and ensuring the same left-wing cheerleading and conservative bashing will continue in their network morning and evening hours for years to come."

For the full press release, click here. Click here for the Sawyer profile and here for the Stephanopoulos profile.

By NewsBusters.org
December 9, 2009
Leave a Comment

Listen for the Outcry: Former Clinton Operative Taking Helm of Morning ‘News’ Show

The official announcement will apparently come tomorrow morning (NewsBusters’ Scott Whitlock reported on the early leaks last week): former Clinton campaign operative George Stephanopoulos will start Monday as co-anchor of ABC’s Good Morning America. He’ll also keep his job as the host of ABC’s This Week, at least for the time being.

Here’s one yardstick for measuring the media’s response: Back in 1997, CBS announced that ex-GOP Representative Susan Molinari (pictured at right) would take over as co-host of Saturday Morning. Journalists quickly howled at the breaching of the sacred “barricade that is supposed to exist in journalism between the political people and the officials on the one hand, and the reporters on the other.” NPR’s Mara Liasson said it was “disturbing” of CBS to hire a Republican; Nina Totenberg exclaimed: “This really makes me want to puke.”

Molinari’s Saturday CBS show avoided politics, so she spent most mornings talking about movies and toys and vacation ideas. But according to the Washington Post’s Howard Kurtz, “Stephanopoulos, now ABC's chief Washington correspondent, had told network executives he wanted to inject GMA with a harder-news focus as a condition of taking the job.”

ABC, of course, has aided in the transformation of Stephanopoulos from political spinmeister into supposedly neutral journalist over the years, allowing him to fill in as anchor of World News as well as on Good Morning America.

Stephanopoulos joined ABC News at the end of Bill Clinton’s first term, starting as an analyst but quickly migrated into the role of Washington correspondent and supposedly non-partisan analyst. In July 2001, Good Morning America’s Diane Sawyer praised Stephanopoulos for his presumed objectivity: “You’ve been completely non-partisan in covering the news.” Stephanopoulos now takes Sawyer’s job, as she steps in as the new anchor of World News on December 21, replacing the retiring Charles Gibson.

The concept that Stephanopoulos has been “completely non-partisan” is laughable. Early on, he was brought on to analyze one of his former boss’s State of the Union addresses: “Virtuoso, Peter,” he exulted to then-anchor Peter Jennings of Bill Clinton’s oratory. "The address of a proud President, a tireless policy wonk and a very shrewd political strategist." (ABC’s post-State of the Union coverage, January 27, 2000.)

Earlier this year, Stephanopoulos and Sawyer admired a White House-released photograph of President Obama handing out cookies at a Super Bowl party: “These [pictures] are just remarkable, Diane. We’ve never really seen anything like this before in real time,” Stephanopoulos gushed. (ABC’s World News, February 16, 2009.)

For many more examples of Stephanopoulos’s “non-partisan” approach, check out the Media Research Center’s freshly-updated “Profile in Bias.”

Here’s some of how the MSM greeted the elevation of a Republican politician back in 1997:

■ "What about the barricade that is supposed to exist in journalism between the political people and the officials on the one hand, and the reporters on the other? Aren't you tearing that barricade down?" — Question from a reporter to Rep. Susan Molinari (R-N.Y.) at the May 28, 1997 press conference announcing her move to CBS.

■ "It has renewed debate over what some call the revolving door between politics and the media," observed CNN's Bernard Shaw on the May 28, 2997 Inside Politics.

■ "The GOP News from CBS," read the headline over a May 29, 1997 New York Times editorial which argued: "With the hiring of Representative Susan Molinari to move directly from Congress to the anchor desk, CBS has reduced the wall [between news and politics] to dust. In fact, having already hired Laura Ingraham, CBS News now employs more famous Republican women than the Republican National Committee does."

■ "Well, I think it's disturbing. I mean, she is not going to be a commentator or a part of a show where she's clearly identified with her partisan point of view — she's going to be an anchor. And I think it means, it sends the message that there's no such thing as journalism anymore. It's all just about celebrity-hood and name recognition and I think it's, I think it's disturbing."
— National Public Radio White House reporter Mara Liasson on Fox News Sunday, June 1, 1997.

■ "Well, this really makes me want to puke. You know, at least CBS had the decency, when they hired Diane Sawyer from the Nixon White House, to make her go out and stand in the rain for a year or so, to earn her position....it really, it just makes me want to throw up." — NPR's Nina Totenberg, May 31, 1997 Inside Washington. (Neither Liasson nor Totenberg noted that the current and previous two Presidents of NPR had been Democratic operatives. In fact, when Clinton won the NPR President at the time jumped to the new administration.)

■ "But must we all take sides? One of this country's great contributions to democracy in this century has been the development of an independent, nonpartisan, nonideological press....until recently, at least, American journalists have been trained and worked in an environment that has taught them to keep political advocacy and ideology out of their reporting and writing." — Wall Street Journal Washington Bureau Chief Alan Murray in a Journal op-ed, June 2, 1997.

■ "I don't feel that there is partisanship in the news. I think that there are -- is an attempt -- I mean, it is the basic tenet of journalism to be fair, to be critical, to be watchdogs, and sometimes that means to take unpopular positions with one side of the aisle versus the other. But I think as an activist, as an elected official, it is very difficult for the public to then think that you're now able to — to remove yourself from that debate and act as a journalist should." — NBC News Vice President Cheryl Gould on the PBS News Hour, June 6, 1997.

By NewsBusters.org
December 8, 2009
Leave a Comment

ABC Reminisces Over Favorite Sawyer Moments: Howard Dean ‘Deserved’ Defense From Diane

ABC’s Good Morning America hosts continued to reminisce on Tuesday, preparing for co-anchor Diane Sawyer’s final show on Friday. Weatherman Sam Champion touted the morning show host’s 2004 defense of Howard Dean and his famous Dean Scream: Recounting the segment, Sawyer proudly asserted, "Howard Dean deserved that moment of correction. He did." [Audio available here.]

Champion reconstructed the Sawyer piece on a rally where the then-presidential candidate uttered a well-remembered "Yeah!" Champion recounted, "...When I looked back at all the things where Diane has always asked questions on both sides, all sides of an event- and I think it was, kind of, really intuitive to see the Howard Dean scream and say, ‘Wait a minute. We're not seeing the whole thing.’" He added, "And people are making more out of this than maybe they should be."

The show then featured a clip of Sawyer’s 2004 GMA segment:

DIANE SAWYER: This is the scream Howard Dean says became famous after the media played it nearly 700 times in just a few days. And not only that, his camp adds, what we heard on the air, was not a reflection on the way it sounded in the room.

HOWARD DEAN: And Michigan-

SAWYER: I noticed that on it, he's holding a hand-held microphone, one designed to filter out background noise. And what about the scream as we all heard it?

DEAN: Yeahhh!

Sawyer described her attempt to defend Dean as a "real quest." News anchor Chris Cuomo opined, "Somewhere Howard Dean is clapping, too."

Monday’s reminiscing included a look back at Sawyer’s 2006 trip to North Korea, but skipped her fawning tour of a state-run school. Will all of these remembrances involve some sort of liberal "highlight?" Since Champion asserted that Sawyer asks "questions on both sides, on all sides of an event," surely ABC will come up with some tough critiques of liberals.

Sawyer will become the new host of World News on December 21. To read the MRC’s comprehensive Profile in Bias on the host, go here.

A transcript of the segment, which aired at 7:50am EST on December 8, follows:

SAM CHAMPION: This was something, when I looked back at all the things where Diane has always asked questions on both sides, all sides of an event- and I think it was, kind of, really intuitive to see the Howard Dean scream and say, "Wait a minute. We're not seeing the whole thing. And people are making more out of this than maybe they should be."

[File footage from 2004.]

DIANE SAWYER: This is the scream Howard Dean says became famous after the media played it nearly 700 times in just a few days. And not only that, his camp adds, what we heard on the air, was not a reflection on the way it sounded in the room.

HOWARD DEAN: And Michigan-

SAWYER: I noticed that on it, he's holding a hand-held microphone, one designed to filter out background noise. And what about the scream as we all heard it?

DEAN: Yeahhh!

SAWYER: Well, listen to how it was in the room. [Audio of the crowd noise.] The so-called scream couldn't really be heard at all. [File footage ends.] And I want- do we have a camera on Anna Robertson, who is also leaving our family. And Anna produced that piece with me. It was a real quest for the two of us. And she made it happen. So, yay, Anna.

CHRIS CUOMO: Somewhere Howard Dean is clapping, too.

SAWYER: Howard Dean deserved that moment of correction. He did.

By NewsBusters.org
December 7, 2009
Leave a Comment

ABC Lovingly Looks Back at Diane Sawyer, Skips Fawning North Korea Moment

On Monday’s Good Morning America, the ABC show began a week’s worth of nostalgic segments on the legacy of host Diane Sawyer, who will leave the program on Friday to become the new anchor of World News. Chris Cuomo gushed over Sawyer’s 2006 trip to North Korea, lauding her "pivotal" interview: "It really matters to people and it makes us all proud, when you hear something like that. You ask that question that we were all so worried about."

Cuomo was referring to Sawyer’s questioning of a North Korean general, but didn’t mention her superficial tour of a school in that country, also from the same visit. (See above video.) On the October 19, 2006 GMA, while being escorted by officials of the state, she touted, "It is a world away from the unruly individualism of any American school."

Seemingly ignoring the concept of propaganda and brainwashing, Sawyer intoned, "Ask [the students] about their country, and they can’t say enough." One North Korean girl brightly chirped, "We are the happiest children in the world."

Speaking of the trip on Monday, Cuomo extolled, "This one really knocked my socks off." Sadly, that incident was not an isolated occasion. Two more examples of Sawyer conducting softball interviews with dictators can be found below:

Co-host Diane Sawyer: "A number of people have already said, ‘Is there anything surprising, personal about [Iranian] President [Mahmoud] Ahmadinejad that we didn’t know?’ Well, it turns out, someone told me he cries a lot. That he is dramatically sentimental and sympathetic if someone comes up and expresses a personal plight. So I just asked him, are you often in tears?"

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad: "Yes, that’s true. Not only for Iranians, of course, they are very close to me and I love all Iranians. And anywhere, when I see people suffering, I have the same reaction....Even when I see on TV that, for example, some Americans, because of tornadoes or a hurricane, they have lost their homes, I become sad."

— ABC’s Good Morning America, February 13, 2007.

"There may not be any other man in history who better embodies the saying that one man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter....For most Israelis, many Jews, he was a bloody terrorist and nothing more. Yet elsewhere in the world, even among Arabs who questioned his leadership, he was treated as a hero, freedom fighter, revolutionary. A diminutive man who became a larger than life symbol of the Palestinian dream."

— Sawyer reporting Yasser Arafat’s death, Good Morning America, November 11, 2004.

The ABC host will begin anchoring World News on December 21. For more examples of Sawyer’s ten years of bias at Good Morning America, see the MRC’s Profile in Bias.

A transcript of the December 7 segment, which aired at 7:48am EST, follows:

7am tease

DIANE SAWYER: And we wanted you to know that all of us at the desk have a kind of team announcement this morning. Because, we wanted you to know that this is going to be my last week after ten years here at Good Morning America, side by side.

ROBIN ROBERTS: You really are giving up your day job, finally, after all this time. It is so difficult. I just keep staring at you. That’s why I wasn’t even looking at the camera. You know, thank you. And we're going to do all things just like you this week. We're going to have fun. We're going to look back.

SAWYER: Yes, I’ve calculated: 2,281 shows, roughly.

7:44

ROBERTS: Coming up, Diane’s greatest hits. The moments we’ll always remember. We count down to her final show here on GMA.

7:48

CHRIS CUOMO: [The Beatles "In My Life" is playing in the background. Shots of Sawyer in action can be seen onscreen.] The many faces and hairdos of Diane Sawyer. It is not easy, but it is necessary. This week, around the water cooler, we are starting the march to no more Diane. We heard the news. Now, the moments that each of us remember. I get to go first. An exclusive privilege in and of itself. For me, I want to focus on the real and the journalism. It is amazing, I think, to all of us what we've been able to see you do for people on this show, here at home, but maybe more impressively, abroad. World leaders, Diane Sawyer, getting to sit down and talk to them about very impressive things. This one really knocked my socks off. You're not supposed to go to North Korea. That’s what they tell us. And I think Diane has been there ten times. Who knows how many times the right way? Anyway, let's listen to this. A pivotal time.

[Clip of Sawyer from North Korea visit.]

SAWYER: I asked him could his nuclear be loaded on nuclear missiles. He would not say whether they could nuclearize their missile. But he said, "Just be assured, we do have the facilities to deliver nuclear weapons. We are ready."

CUOMO: So, there he is. That was General Lee Chan?

SAWYER: That's right. And he was in charge of the watch facility, the forward watch facilities there. Yes, you're right. The hairdo with those glasses. I appreciate all the sentiments, but of course, you sort of see yourself go by and try to imagine.

CUOMO: But, it matters. It really matters to people and it makes us all proud, when you hear something like that. You ask that question that we were all so worried about.

By NewsBusters.org
December 2, 2009
Leave a Comment

ABC’s Diane Sawyer Ignores Joe Biden Gaffe: The ‘Nuclear State of Afghanistan?’

Good Morning America’s Diane Sawyer on Wednesday conducted a generally tough interview with Joe Biden on the subject of Afghanistan, but ignored an embarrassing gaffe from the Vice President: "Our number one enemy concern is the existential threat, al Qaeda. Number two is the stability of a nuclear state called Afghanistan, under siege by radicals." Did the Vice President, perhaps, mean Pakistan? It's unclear as Sawyer didn't follow up. [Audio available here.]

Earlier in the segment, responding to Sawyer’s comment that Republicans believe setting a date for removing troops is a bad idea, Biden argued, "How are they emboldened, knowing that by the time we train up the Afghanis, we're going to be gradually handing off, beginning in 2003 [sic]?" Beginning in 2003? Would journalists allow Sarah Palin to get away with such obvious malapropisms?

Despite this, Sawyer did conduct a tougher interview than her December 1 segment with Robert Gibbs. In that segment, she hit the White House press secretary mostly from the left. In contrast, the anchor chided Biden on Wednesday: "But, Senator John McCain and the Republicans, many others have been saying, to set a targeted beginning-of-withdrawal date at all, only emboldens enemies and dispirits allies. Does it?"

On the subject of reducing the number of troops, she wondered, "The President talks about withdrawals, beginning, just beginning, in July 2011. But if the Afghan troops are not ready to take over, will he start withdrawing anyway?"

Trying to pin Biden down, Sawyer challenged, "...We understood that you wanted to keep the focus on Pakistan, particularly the border where al Qaeda is, because you don't secure that border, what happens in Afghanistan is not going to make the quantum difference. Did you lose the argument with the President? And is 30,000 a good number in your view?"

Sawyer’s questions were a welcome change in tone from Tuesday. It's too bad the ABC co-host failed to quiz Biden on his puzzling comments about the "nuclear state called Afghanistan."

A transcript of the December 2 segment, which aired at 7:06am EST, follows:

DIANE SAWYER: Well, just three minutes before we went on the air, I had a chance to ask a few questions of Vice President Joe Biden, about the President's surge and withdrawal in 2011 strategy in Afghanistan. Mr. Vice President, want to get right to it. The President talks about withdrawals, beginning, just beginning, in July 2011. But if the Afghan troops are not ready to take over, will he start withdrawing anyway?

VICE PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN: Look, we put together a strategy that's narrow in focus, that our allies and our military and civilian leadership thinks is going to work. And I assume will work. The fact of the matter is, in July 2011, there will be an awful lot of American troop there's. And the only question is the gradual- how steep the slope will be to begin to withdraw. This idea that we have-

SAWYER: Let me ask you about- I'm sorry. I didn't mean to interrupt.

BIDEN: That’s all right.

SAWYER: But, Senator John McCain and the Republicans, many others have been saying, to set a targeted beginning-of-withdrawal date at all, only emboldens enemies and dispirits allies. Does it?

BIDEN: I don't know how it does either of those things. First of all, embolden the enemy how? They’ll be over 100,000 American troops and 135,000 NATO and allied troops in the region. How are they emboldened, knowing that by the time we train up the Afghani, we're going to be gradually handing off, beginning in 2003 [sic]? This idea that they’re going to lay low and all of sudden come racing back when we only have 98,000 troops there, I just- it's just not logical to me. And in the meantime, if they lay low, that will be just wonderful. It will allow us to faster train the Afghan troops. Allow us to further degrade al Qaeda in Pakistan. Allows us to further help the Pakistanis to have a more capable military to take on the bad guys in the western part of the country. So, it sounds good. But there’s no- I don't see logic to it.

SAWYER: A quick question to you. Because, we understood that you wanted to keep the focus on Pakistan, particularly the border where al Qaeda is, because you don't secure that border, what happens in Afghanistan is not going to make the quantum difference. Did you lose the argument with the President? And is 30,000 a good number in your view?

BIDEN: My view all along has been less important what the number is than what the strategy is. And the President laid out the strategy in the following order. Our number one enemy concern is the existential threat, al Qaeda. Number two is the stability of a nuclear state called Afghanistan, under siege by radicals. And number three, prevent the president government, while it’s gaining its sea legs to be able to be toppled or fundamentally altered by the Taliban. They- All three of those things are in place. The President's got the priorities right. The number of troops is much less important than that narrowed, clear strategy. And the expectation that we expect both the Pakistanis to step up. We expect the Afghanis to, in fact, have better governance and train up better. And we're going to be relentless in our continued pursuit, which we are doing and are succeeding in, in going after al Qaeda in Pakistan, where they are.

SAWYER: Mr. Vice President, good to hear from you this morning. Thanks so much.

By NewsBusters.org
November 16, 2009
Leave a Comment

ABC Touts NYT ‘Conservative’ David Brooks to Bash Palin, Features Anonymous Fact Check

Good Morning America on Monday began a week of coverage on Sarah Palin’s new book by repeatedly fact checking claims from the Republican and highlighting a attack by the liberals’ favorite "conservative," New York Times columnist David Brooks. Reporter Kate Snow asserted that "even conservatives are on the attack" against Palin.

She then played a clip of Brooks, who has previously gone after Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck and others: "Yeah, she's a joke. I mean I just can't take her seriously. The idea that this potential talk show host is considered seriously for the Republican nomination, believe me, it'll never happen."

Snow began the piece on Palin and her book Going Rogue by pointing out that "the blitz has begun and so has the fact checking." She then launched into a series of supposed corrections:

KATE SNOW: In her book, Palin says top aide Steve Schmidt yelled at her over the phone. "The force of his screaming blew my hair back. How could anyone be so stupid?" But, staffers say there was no yelling, just an e-mail saying "Who set this up? Are you kidding me?" And then there's Saturday Night Live. In her book, Palin says she wanted to appear on the show. "Let's go on and neutralize some of this and have some fun." But, in an e-mail Palin writes "These folks are whack. What's the upside in giving them or any celebrity venue a ratings boost?"

The 2008 campaign is over. Why is GMA relying on anonymous e-mails from disgruntled staffers to rebuff Palin? (Secondly, is it possible there could have been both e-mails and yelling?) Snow closed with more gossip:

SNOW: And what about Senator John McCain? There was a conference call, we've learned on Friday between McCain and many of his top Former aides. On that call, McCain essentially told them he would prefer they stay out of the Palin book coverage and not engage her. He apologized that they were going through this and told them he understood if they needed to refute factual errors or protect their own reputations. But he also said something like "This will pass and will pass faster if you all just keep quiet." He, by the way, does have a copy of the book signed by Palin. But I'm told he hasn't spoken to her in months.

Since Palin is going on the record, wouldn’t it seem justifiable for news outlets to expect the same from those criticizing the former governor?

And Snow’s insistence on fact checking is odd, considering that she repeatedly fawned over Hillary Clinton during the 2008 presidential campaign and didn't challenge the Senator very often. On October 1, 2007, she described Clinton as "the master of a shrewd political skill, disarming her critics with a gleam in her eye and a roar straight from the belly." On October 25, 2007, as the then-presidential candidate turned 60, Snow marveled that "instead of facing gray hair and retirement, for Hillary Clinton, being a member of AARP is fund-raising gold."

To ABC’s credit, a follow-up segment did critique Newsweek for putting Palin on the front cover in running shorts. Co-host Diane Sawyer wondered, "And, as we know, a lot of the guys have done running shorts pictures for running magazines. Was it fair of Newsweek to put that on their cover?"

Guest Cokie Roberts chided, "Look, she posed for that picture. So it's fair game, but it is- it is a way of saying, don't take this person seriously. She's just a chick in shorts."

A transcript of the segment, which aired at 7:07am EST on November 16, follows:  

DIANE SAWYER: Okay, well, all of this seems ripe for a comment from our political observer ABC's Cokie Roberts. Cokie, come in this morning. Governor Palin, as you know, firing from both barrels at her own former camp. They're firing back. Ever seen anything like this before?

COKIE ROBERTS: No, this is quite remarkable. And she will be out, you know, in her bus which is covered with her picture, the cover of the book, out around the country expecting to draw huge crowds and she'll have- she'll have the loudest voice on this, for sure.

SAWYER: We have a brand-new ABC News/Washington Post poll out this morning that shows 60 percent of all Americans say they do not feel she is qualified to be president. Do not feel it, but it seems that her book strategy is gaining ground among Republicans. Because, our poll shows her numbers are up, 61 percent of Republicans do think she's qualified. Go out on a limb here. You think she's running for 2012?

ROBERTS: I think she's finding out if she's running for 2012 I think that she'll see how this goes. She'll see how bruised she gets, whether people take her seriously, whether, you know, she is the joke that you just heard David Brooks saying of her or whether she's the new Ronald Reagan, which Newt Gingrich says she might be.

SAWYER: That's right. What about a Hillary Clinton/Sarah Palin, what, coffee summit, I think they're calling it instead of the beer summit this morning. Think it'll ever happen?

ROBERTS: Wouldn't you and I like to be there with them?

SAWYER: Oh, please invite us.

ROBERTS: Well, I think it might happen someday. But, it's not likely to happen while Sarah Palin's running as a Republican and Hillary Clinton is in the Obama administration, but they could share some true stories about the sexism during the last campaign aimed at both of them.

SAWYER: I want to ask you about something going back to this Newsweek cover, and Kate showed in her piece, because the cover picture was a picture that Governor Palin did for Runners World. And, as we know, a lot of the guys have done running shorts pictures for running magazines. Was it fair of Newsweek to put that on their cover?

ROBERTS: And we haven't seen those guys in shorts on Newsweek's cover, have we? Look, she posed for that picture. So it's fair game, but it is- it is a way of saying, don't take this person seriously. She's just a chick in shorts.

SAWYER: All right. Well, thanks to you, Cokie. Checking back in with you later. And a reminder to everyone, you can see Barbara Walters' exclusive interview with Sarah Palin this week on ABC. And, of course, you know, she's also appearing other places this week and beginning tomorrow on GMA be sure to tune in to see Barbara's interview and, of course, on Friday night on 20/20.

By NewsBusters.org
November 16, 2009
Leave a Comment

ABC Omits Critics of Obama’s ‘Jarring and Inappropriate’ Bow to Emperor; Sawyer Says Dealing with Royalty ‘Just Too Confusing’

ABC’s Good Morning America finally picked up on the deep bow President Obama performed for the Emperor of Japan over the weekend. Co-host Diane Sawyer ran through how other U.S. Presidents have greeted either Emperor Akhito or his father, the late Emperor Hirohito over the years — some bowing, some not. Sawyer claimed that Americans are “not trained to greet royalty” and “it’s just too confusing.”

Actually, the government employs lots of experts on culture and protocol to make sure that our presidents are fully “trained” on what to do when they represent our government overseas — which is not to say that all of our presidents perform these duties flawlessly.

Missing from Sawyer’s run-down is a tidbit that ABC White House correspondent Jake Tapper posted on his “Political Punch” blog Sunday afternoon. Tapper said he received a note from an old friend whom he described as “an academic with expertise about the Japanese Empire, and in general a supporter of President Obama.” According to this expert, it wasn’t necessarily incorrect for Obama to bow, but the President’s “forward lurch” was “jarring and inappropriate.”

The expert described the bow as “in the form of a first year English teacher trying to impress with Karate Kid-level knowledge of Japanese customs. The bow as he performed did not just display weakness in Red State terms, but evoked weakness in Japanese terms.” He noted also that Japan’s Kyodo News emphasized footage of Obama’s more restrained bow to the Emperor’s wife, pictures that “show the president as dignified.”

Here’s Sawyer on Monday morning’s Good Morning America, as transcribed by the MRC’s Scott Whitlock:

DIANE SAWYER: And before we leave the topic of the president's trip overseas I've often thought the hardest subject for every President, what do you do with royalty? We're not trained to greet royalty since 1776. [Onscreen photo of Obama bowing.] The President, as we saw with the emperor, went the full way, lots of comment about that. But we look back over the years and you have, of course, George Bush, former president George Bush Sr. there, head nod. There was Ronald Reagan, hand shake. [Pictures appear onscreen.]

ROBIN ROBERTS: Hand shake. That’s always good.

SAWYER: Richard Nixon went from the waist [Nixon appears to be leaning in.] and Bill Clinton, what was that? [Picture of Clinton clasping his hands, could be clapping.] Kind of yoga thing there. Anyway who can blame them for not knowing what to do? Allegedly, Teddy Roosevelt said once “If I see another king I'm going to bite him.” It's just too confusing when you're American.

That Teddy Roosevelt quote, by the way, came from a 1994 New York Times “Week in Review” item that made the rounds this weekend after Obama’s bow. If Sawyer read the whole item -- related the controversy over then-President Clinton’s much milder bow before the Emperor -- she would have learned that there’s not that much “confusion” over American protocol. According to the Times (then): “the ‘thou need not bow’ commandment from the State Department's protocol office maintained a constancy of more than 200 years.”

A Washington Post item from that same week (retrieved via Nexis) quoted Clinton’s top protocol officer talking about the arrangements for Emperor Akihito’s state visit to Washington: “‘Americans do not bow,’ said Chief of Protocol Molly Raiser. ‘The emperor is known to shake hands. This emperor is much more informal than his father was.’”

Today's New York Times briefly mentions the bow controversy, blaming it on the "conservative American bloggers" who critized Obama. "'During his meetings and his speech in Tokyo, the President observed protocol and enhanced the status of American interests in Japan and across Asia,' said an administration official traveling with the President, who spoke on the condition of anonymity according to protocol. 'Those who suggest otherwise are way off base and only looking to score political points.'"

By NewsBusters.org
November 10, 2009
Leave a Comment

Bozell Column: Fort Hood Horror

Horror spread quickly across America as the story unfolded: an Army psychiatrist went on a shooting rampage at Fort Hood in Texas, killing 13 and wounding 30. But as more information emerged, clearly pointing to an act of terrorism, many in the "news" media simply chose not to report news.

By late afternoon, it emerged that the shooter’s name was Major Nidal Malik Hasan. But that night, CBS and NBC completely avoided mentioning that the shooter was a Muslim. ABC’s Charles Gibson suggested he was a "Muslim convert," which wasn’t right, but at least he wasn’t playing hide-and-seek with the facts. ABC reporter Martha Raddatz spoke for the media in choosing this tidbit: "As for the suspect, Nidal Hasan, as one officer's wife told me, ‘I wish his name was Smith.’"

The coverage grew more factual the next morning, with all the networks noting Hasan was Muslim, and that he shouted "Allahu Akbar" (God is great) as he opened fire. ABC’s Diane Sawyer, though, repeated Raddatz: "We heard Martha Raddatz say last night that the wife of a soldier said ‘I wish his name had been Smith,’ so no one would have a reflexive question about that."

A reflexive question, as in "If a Muslim extremist attacks an Army base shouting ‘Allahu akbar!’ while spraying semi-automatic fire, killing and wounding dozens, is it terrorism?" Ms. Sawyer had nothing to worry about. Here’s how her colleagues covered it.

THEME: The shooting wasn’t just tragic because it killed patriotic Americans who were serving their country. The shooting was "much worse" because it gins up fear-mongering right-wingers.

Newsweek’s Evan Thomas: "I cringe that he's a Muslim. I mean, because it inflames all the fears. I think he's probably just a nut case. But with that label attached to him, it will get the right wing going and it just -- I mean these things are tragic, but that makes it much worse."

THEME: In the Age of Obama (as opposed to those Bush years), American can be expected to behave after terrorist attacks and not overreact.

From USA Today: "‘We haven't heard of anything violent, which is a good thing,’ said Ibrahim Hooper, spokesman for the Council on American-Islamic Relations, a Muslim advocacy group. ‘It shows our society has matured in how it responds to these incidents.’"

THEME: Let’s not be too quick to judge these Muslims. After all, we have our Christian nut cases, too.

A Boston Globe op-ed by Harvard professor Harvey Cox: "If some seem ready to die for faith, others are ready to kill for it, gunning down abortion doctors in church, hijacking planes, and exploding bombs at weddings." On CBS, Bob Schieffer energetically sought full moral equivalence: "And you know Islam doesn’t have a majority – or the Christian religion has its full, you know, full helping of nuts, too."

THEME: Blame someone other than the shooter for shooting.

Schieffer grew much more annoying, suggesting that this killing was all the Army’s fault, that "this shows the Army still does not take protecting soldiers' mental health as seriously as it does training them to shoot." It was the Army’s fault for not seeing that this was a radical Muslim who could be a danger to others. This kind of arrogance – sitting on a throne of 20-20 hindsight and demeaning our military – explains why the media’s favorability ratings have gone into the toilet.

If the Army had removed Hasan before his mass murder, Bob Schieffer and the other anchors would have been standing shoulder to shoulder with the ACLU people and the CAIR crowd suggesting anti-Muslim bigotry. These anchormen thought the Constitution was being shredded when the Bush administration attempted to intercept messages between bad guys here and al-Qaeda abroad. That was unhealthy "domestic spying." They have forfeited their right to question the military now. In their idealistic vision, we would have all remained ignorant of Hasan’s phone calls, and completely vulnerable to his rampages.

Even now, some media liberals were astonishing in the aftermath of this Islamic terrorism – and that is precisely what it was. Jaws dropped at the idiocy of Chris Matthews on MSNBC when he proclaimed, "Apparently, he tried to contact al-Qaeda. Is that the point at which you say, ‘This guy is dangerous?' That's not a crime to call up al-Qaeda, is it? Is it? I mean, where do you stop the guy?"

Answer to the well-paid idiot: Before he kills Americans on a military base.

By NewsBusters.org
November 4, 2009
Leave a Comment

Broadcast TV Morning Shows Offered 64 Words on Maine Gay Vote; NBC Totally Spiked It

Maine's successful referendum to repeal a newly-imposed "same-sex marriage" law would have been a huge national story if the gay left had won. But since they narrowly lost, the broadcast network morning shows on Wednesday barely acknowledged it. In fact, NBC avoided the news for its entire four hours of Today. The Early Show on CBS offered 20 words from Jeff Glor early in the show: "In Maine, a loss for supporters of gay marriage yesterday. Voters voted down a law that had legalized same-sex marriage."

ABC’s Good Morning America led the pack with two quick mentions. In the first hour, Diane Sawyer told George Stephanopoulos: "In Maine, you probably heard about this, voters were voting on gay marriage. They decided against gay marriage, 53 to 47 percent." That’s 22 words. In the 8 am hour, this squib from news anchor Chris Cuomo: "And we do have the results of one widely watched ballot initiative. Voters in Maine repealed a law that allowed same-sex marriages." That’s also 22 words.

At least the networks didn’t offering the typical labeling imbalance, where "conservatives" defeated "gay rights activists." In his 8 am newscast, Cuomo noted "conservative Republican" Bob McDonnell won, and Bill Owens "defeated his conservative opponent in upstate New York."

Maine is the 31st state to vote against "same-sex marriage," although the margins of victory have shrunk over the last few years. A left-wing victory there surely would have been a striking new development. But the avoidance of electoral results that cause liberals to gnash their teeth (or make liberalism less than the inevitable wave of the future) give the networks a very politically selective image.

By NewsBusters.org
November 3, 2009
Leave a Comment

Surprise: ABC’s Sawyer Hits Gore on Profits From Global Warming, Plays Glenn Beck Attack

Good Morning America’s Diane Sawyer conducted a surprisingly tough interview with Al Gore on Tuesday, pressing him on profiting from global warming and whether or not climate change legislation is pointless in light of pollution-spewing countries such as China. She also forced the ex-Vice President to respond to a challenge from Glenn Beck.

Sawyer even pointed out the amount of methane gas created from the bodily functions of cows, observing that it's "20 times more damaging it is than CO2." The host, who will become the anchor of World News in January, then played a clip of Fox News' Beck mocking Gore:

GLENN BECK: I'm siding with PETA on this one. Once again asking Al Gore if you really want to save the planet, Al, why don't you put down the cheeseburger and pick up the veggie burger? Time for, maybe, soy milk and tofurkey.

GORE: [Laughs]: Well, you know, there is a serious issue about the connection between the growing meat intensity of diets around the world and damage to the environment. That is a legitimate issue. And like a lot of people, I eat less meat now than I used to. I'm not a vegetarian, don't plan to become one, but it's a healthy choice to eat more vegetables than fruits. So it's not a laughable issue.

"So, tofurkey for you," she jibed.

Speaking of the upcoming global warming conference in Copenhagen and of China’s environmental record, Sawyer quizzed, "And everyone keeps saying, how can go and have the U.S. commit to controls when China is not doing the same thing? What's the point?" After Gore ducked the question and touted the country’s solar power facilities, the ABC host tried again: "But they're still the major polluter on CO2."

Finally, the anchor highlighted a front page story in the November 3 New York Times on how some critics accuse Gore of profiting from climate change: "But they [the New York Times] say you are about to become, perhaps, the world's first carbon billionaire because of the amounts of money that you've made from your investments, from your green investment."

Sawyer certainly should be commended for being far tougher than CBS Evening News host Katie Couric. As the MRC’s Brent Baker noted, she enthused on CBSNews.com: "I'm honored to be joined today by the Godfather of Green, the King of Conservation: Former Vice President Al Gore."

[Special thanks to MRC intern Mike Sargent for creating the video.]

A transcript of the November 2 segment, which aired at 7:12am EST, follows:

DIANE SAWYER: And to discuss it all, former Vice President Gore joining us. He has a book that follows up on his best-seller An Inconvenient Truth. And it’s called Our Choice: A Plan to Solve the Climate Crisis on recycled paper, 1,513 trees saved in the publication of this book, I understand. Good to have you with us. Good to see you.

AL GORE: Good morning.

SAWYER: Cannot let the morning of politics go by without asking, the Republicans, as you know, are saying what’s happening today is a referendum on the Obama's presidency, the nine months of it. And it is a rebellion against big government intrusion. Do you agree?

GORE: Well, I'm one who strongly believes that the voters ought to decide this and they're voting today. God bless them and I prefer to let them make the decision and we can talk about it tomorrow. Whatever happens.

SAWYER: You have said that - you didn't rule out exactly- someday might re-enter politics? You said you were in rehab?

GORE: I doubt that very seriously. I'm a recovering politician now. I'm on, about, step nine now.

SAWYER: [Laughs.] Might lure you back. Might lure you back here. I do want to turn to the whole question of the global conference coming up in Copenhagen and the importance of it which I know you say it's a crossroads. This is it. In December, a year ago, President Obama, not then President Obama came out of a meeting with you and committed to this issue saying it's a matter of complete urgency. Let's take a look.

PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA: We all believe what the scientists have been telling us for years now, that this is a matter of urgency and national security. And it has to be dealt with in a serious way. That's what I intend my administration to do.

SAWYER: Yet we have no word yet that he's going to go to the conference. Does he have to go to the conference and what does he have to do there?

GORE: Well, I think that- I hope that he does go and this conference is really crucial. First, because the scientists have been saying for quite some time we still have time to avoid the worst of the consequences of this cataclysm that is now unfolding. But we don't have a lot of time and this is the best opportunity. So, I hope they will go but already-

SAWYER: You have no personal commitment from him?

GORE: He hasn't told me that he will go, but I feel certain that he will. Some other heads of state are going. And, you know, our country is regarded as the natural leader of the world. I don't think that's false pride as an American. The rest of the world just sees us that way. President Obama has already committed an enormous amount in his green stimulus, his EPA has issued regulations requiring the reduction of CO2. All large emitters will have to publicly report their CO2 emissions starting January 1. A I believe that there is an excellent chance that the Senate will pass legislation before Copenhagen which will strengthen his hand.

SAWYER: But, you know the objections that have been raised. For one thing, China, together, the U.S. and China produce 40 percent of the world's pollution, CO2 pollution, the majority now by China. And everyone keeps saying, how can go and have the U.S. commit to controls when China is not doing the same thing? What's the point?

GORE: Well, actually in the last three years China has done a U-turn. They’re still opening a lot of new coal plants but will be the number one solar power and wind power in the world by next year. They're building the largest super grid in the world. They're planning two and a half times more trees than the rest of the world combined. They’re evaluating officials on the basis of how effective they are in reducing CO2.

SAWYER: But they’re still the major polluter on CO2.

GORE: They are. They have 1.3 billion people and their economy is growing. But they are engineering a major shift toward renewable energy. Last week, there was a story that this huge wind farm in Texas is purchasing windmills 100 percent made in China and the Chinese government is providing most of the financing. We need to see this opportunity for the U.S. to create millions of good new jobs here at home and reduce our dangerous dependence on foreign oil by relying on energy that's here in the United States, renewable energy that creates jobs that can't be outsourced.

SAWYER: Another objection you see and it brings laughs, always. But it's a constant one and it's from those who are doubters about what's needed to be done about methane and the amount of methane-

GORE: Yeah. Yeah.

SAWYER: - diplomatically produced, that cows produce and how damaging it is, 20 times more damaging it is than CO2. Here's Glenn Beck giving you a challenge about cows and methane.

GLENN BECK: I'm siding with PETA on this one. Once again asking Al Gore if you really want to save the planet, Al, why don't you put down the cheeseburger and pick up the veggie burger? Time for, maybe, soy milk and tofurkey.

GORE: [Laughs]: Well, you know, there is a serious issue about the connection between the growing meat intensity of diets around the world and damage to the environment. That is a legitimate issue. And like a lot of people, I eat less meat now than I used to. I'm not a vegetarian, don't plan to become one, but it's a healthy choice to eat more vegetables than fruits. So it's not a laughable issue. Diet is an issue that's connected but the biggest issue by far is CO2 and methane comes from a lot of sources including- it is the principal component of natural gas, coal mines, rice, a lot of sources and it plays a somewhat larger role than scientists thought in the past.

SAWYER: So tofurkey for you?

GORE: No. I don't plan to. No thanks.

SAWYER: Alright. Cannot let you go. In the New York Times this morning, we pick it up. Front page story, "Spotlight on Gore's Dual role." And they do not- They do not question your commitment to these issues about the environment. But they say you are about to become, perhaps, the world's first carbon billionaire because of the amounts of money that you've made from your investments, from your green investment.

GORE: They don't say that. That quote is from one of the deniers and that, certainly, is not true. But I am proud to put my money where my mouth has been for 30 years. And though that's not the majority of my business activity, I absolutely believe in investing in accordance with my beliefs and values. And I recommend that everybody do. I think that our country will be successful by making a choice to switch toward renewable energy. Diane, how long are we going to stay on this roller coaster of foreign oil prices going away way up and when we get ready to make a commitment to get off then they drop the price again until we relax and then they jack it up again? The rate of new discoveries is declining even as the demand is growing around the world. This roller coaster is headed for a crash and we're in the front car. We need to protect our national security, create more jobs here at home and solve the climate crisis and do right by our kids.

SAWYER: Thank you very much, Mr. Vice President, for being here. It is Our Choice. It's about the solutions at ABCNews.com if you want to read excerpts of the book.

By NewsBusters.org
October 27, 2009
Leave a Comment

ABC Heavily Promotes New HBO Documentary on Obama: He’s so ‘Zen’ and ‘Normal’


Good Morning America co-host Diane Sawyer on Tuesday helped promote an upcoming HBO documentary on Barack Obama and allowed producer Ed Norton to gush over the "zen" presidential campaign of the Democratic candidate. [MP3 audio excerpt here] Sawyer breathlessly teased the program as "the Obamas behind closed doors. The grandmother who raised him and the man you’ve never seen."

Sawyer played several clips of the By the People: The Election of Barack Obama, a film that followed Obama and his family during the 2008 campaign. The segment, which ran six and a half minutes, will be supplemented by more promotion on Tuesday’s Nightline. When asked what surprised her about the Obamas, director Amy Rice enthused about "just how normal they were."

Norton was impressed with the "calm," "no-drama Obama." The actor continued, "And in a weird way, when you look behind the curtain with that team, they are really zen. It's amazing how zen they are."

To her credit, Sawyer did at least express some skepticism as to how authentic the whole project was: "Do you really think you saw the true family, though? Because as we know, when you set out to do these documentaries, everyone says complete access."

However, she didn’t ask any questions as to the left-wing bent of HBO and the network’s documentaries. Earlier in the year, the channel produced Teddy: In His Own Words.

Norton is a well known liberal activist and Hollywood star. On March 27, 2009, he appeared on NBC's Today to compare his Earth Hour documentary on global warming to the civil rights march on Selma. On April 22, 2008, he lamented how America lagged behind China when it came to banning plastic bags.

A transcript of the October 27 segment, which aired at 7:33am, follows:

7am tease

DIANE SAWYER: The Obamas behind closed doors. The grandmother who raised him and the man you’ve never seen.

7:30am tease

SAWYER: [Video of the Obama family playing a game.] Take a look. This is inside the kitchen in the Chicago house of the Obamas. And there, Sasha, Michelle and Malia are there behind the scenes. And- suddenly- playing dominos when, when a phone rings. Who is it? Stay tuned, because it’s a new, unprecedented documentary. Filmmakers behind the scenes. An exclusive first look coming up.

7:33

DIANE SAWYER: We're going to turn to that never-before-seen footage of the Obama family, on the journey to the White House. It's behind-the-scenes video of an HBO documentary called By the People: the Election of Barack Obama. It captures the family at home and candidate Obama preparing for one of those nerve-racking debates.

UNIDENTIFIED STAFFER: You seem to feel the need to really answer every single McCain attack. I think our view is you're at the stage of the race, you won two debates. Your numbers are strong, where you can push past it. You shouldn't feel vulnerable to every single thing the guy says.

BARACK OBAMA: I mean, I think if he presses me on honesty, I think there’s nothing wrong- the only thing I don't want to sound whiney about his lies.

SAWYER: I don't want to sound whiney. There he was. Oscar-nominated actor Edward Norton, the film's producer. And joining us along with Amy Rice, who co-directed the film. It’s great to have you both with us this morning.

EDWARD NORTON: Thanks. Good to be here.

SAWYER: How many hours did you spend with him and his family?

NORTON: Oh my God.

AMY RICE: We ended up with 770 hours of footage in the end.

SAWYER: 770 Hours.

RICE: Not necessarily all with them. But we and our editors ended up cutting into two hours.

SAWYER: And, Ed, why did you want to do it?

NORTON: You know, it started off as an entirely different idea. We originally had planned to make a film about a freshman senator's experience in politics. And Amy and Alicia had been filming for nine months already when, suddenly, they decided to run. And so, we found ourselves actually entirely, unexpectedly, with this opportunity to make a film about a presidential campaign.

SAWYER: Quite a trajectory from a freshman senator to the man running for President there.

NORTON: Yeah. It was- for us, it was really lightening in a bottle in the sense that, having to gotten to know him, and his staff a little and them understanding that we were doing this film, they were sort of comfortable with Amy and Alicia. So, we got this amazing opportunity.

SAWYER: I want to take us back into the kitchen in Chicago that we saw earlier.

NORTON: That was Amy filming that.

SAWYER: That was Amy filming. And we know- They're playing dominos in the kitchen. And we had heard during the campaign trail, that his calls home were everything. We have a chance to see what happens when they answer the phone this time.

[Phone ringing ]

MICHELLE OBAMA: Would you get that?

MALIA OBAMA: I'll get it.

MICHELLE OBAMA: If it's Kathy, tell her she can stay as long as she wants.

MALIA OBAMA: Hello? Hello? Hi, daddy.

MICHELLE OBAMA: It's dad.

MALIA OBAMA: Fine. Daddy, I had to eat a lot of chocolate today. Yep. Okay. I love you.

SASHA OBAMA: Hi, daddy. Good.

SAWYER: Had to eat a lot of chocolate today. I'm still parsing that. Nice thing to have to do. Do you really think you saw the true family, though? Because as we know, when you set out to do these documentaries, everyone says complete access. And the next thing you know, they're shutting a few doors here and there.

NORTON: It's true. I mean, I think we can say that there's an unprecedented level of access to a candidate as he goes through this experience. And his family and his senior advisers. I mean, we got opportunities to shoot debate prep, to be with them in the surge of the emotion of the victories and kind of setbacks. And I think it's an unusual intimacy with that process.

SAWYER: And yet, we're all different in private than we are in public. There's small ways in which we are. What were the ones you learned, Amy? What were the things that we would never have had a chance to see, just looking at the public Obama?

RICE: There's a lot of humor, I think. But they're pretty much the same on and off camera. I mean, we were around them for three years filming.

SAWYER: Nothing surprised either of the two of you?

RICE: What surprised me was just how normal they were.

NORTON: And how calm. I mean, if you remember in some election films, like The War Room, you peek around the corner and everybody's screaming at each other. And, you know, they called him no-drama Obama. And in a weird way, when you look behind the curtain with that team, they are really zen. It's amazing how zen they are.

SAWYER: The War Room, of course, about the Clinton run. I want to turn to the clip about his grandmother, because you had a chance to interview her, which is unheard of. We knew there was one, little clip we'd ever seen of her. But you had a chance to talk to her. And then, he gives her a phone call at one point. And I want to play that.

MADELYN DUNHAM: He wanted to be a big-time basketball player. And he played basketball every minute that he could. He had a group of boys that would come over to this apartment and raid the refrigerator. And go play basketball and do things.

BARACK OBAMA: I know this is hard on you. All of this. Well, I love you, sweetie. All right. Bye-bye. Yeah. That was a good call.

SAWYER: And as we know, she died the day before the election. Before I let you go, you're going to run the marathon.

NORTON: I am running the New York marathon.

SAWYER: Ed Norton. With a Masai warrior?

NORTON: With three of them. I threw down a-

SAWYER: Are you a masochist?

NORTON: No. We're raising money for a terrific conservation organization that I've been involved with for a long time. And we created this great web-based campaign, where people can sponsor the Masai warriors or me in our run. And-

SAWYER: Have you ever run a marathon before?

NORTON: I have not, Diane. And I- I found out that it's 26.2 miles. Did you know that?

SAWYER: Did you google that last night?

NORTON: I found that out last night.

SAWYER: I just want to know what the Masai word for "Who is this guy?"

NORTON: They're used to the distances. They're more fascinated. Pavement is going to be new for them.

SAWYER: That's right. Well, again, thanks to you both. And it's great to get a preview of the documentary. We always imagine what it was really like during a campaign. You got a chance to be there. Thanks again. And you can see more of By the People: the Election of Barack Obama tonight on Nightline and the HBO documentary premieres on November 3.